Case Law In re Johnson, Case No. 08-18112 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1/15/2009)

In re Johnson, Case No. 08-18112 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1/15/2009)

Document Cited Authorities (13) Cited in Related
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

PAT E. MORGENSTERN-CLARREN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Pro se debtor Cinseree Johnson filed her chapter 7 bankruptcy case on October 21, 2008. Alan Treinish serves as the chapter 7 trustee responsible for administering her bankruptcy estate. The debtor filed a document titled "Motion to Cease and [Desist]" in which she asks for a court order directing the trustee not to ask her certain questions and to restrict attendance in the hearing room during her § 341 examination. See 11 U.S.C. § 341. (Docket 36). The trustee opposes the motion on the ground that his requests and procedures are within the scope of his responsibilities and the bankruptcy rules. (Docket 56). The court held a hearing on January 15, 2009.1 For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.

JURISDICTION

Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and General Order No. 84 entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

FACTS AND DISCUSSION
A. The Dispute

The United States trustee is required to "convene and preside at a meeting of creditors" within a reasonable time after a voluntary bankruptcy case is filed. 11 U.S.C. § 341(a). Trustee Treinish held such an examination in this case on November 18, 2008 and adjourned it to December 16, 2008. (Docket 33). In the interim between those two dates, the debtor filed this motion in which she seeks a court order directing the trustee:

(1) not to ask her questions about her primary residence;

(2) not to ask her questions about her vehicle;

(3) not to ask her questions about how she earned her income;

(4) not to ask her questions about a pending lawsuit against Greyhound based on a missing baggage report that she filed;

(5) to cease unequal treatment of debtors based on race;

(6) to identify each person who is in the room during her examination and, preferably, to prevent anyone from entering the room after the examination begins; and

(7) to file all requests for additional information in writing with the court.

In support, the debtor states that her house and vehicle are exempt from her creditors and, therefore, beyond legitimate inquiry. On the issue of her income, the debtor states that it "is of no consequence to this action" and an invasion of privacy. With respect to the lawsuit, the debtor states that she will give the trustee the case number, but not the baggage report. On the equal treatment issue, the debtor states that the trustee asked her more questions than he asked another debtor (a white female), and that the trustee gave the other debtor a "yeah, baby!" smile. She does not explain why she is asking that all further information requests be written.

The trustee provided this explanation for the information he requested:2

1. Evidence of the Debtor's social security number. The Debtor failed to provide evidence of her social security number at the meeting of creditors, and the Trustee requested that documentary evidence of the number be provided.

2. A full copy of the Debtor's 2007 income tax return. The Debtor provided an incomplete income tax return for the year 2007, and the Trustee requested that she provide a full copy of the return, which is required pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 521(e)(2).

3. Information relating to claims of the Debtor against other parties. The Debtor testified that she had a medical malpractice claim, several "civil rights" claims, and a claim relating to the loss of property (baggage) against Greyhound. Some of the claims may not be filed with any court based on the Debtor's testimony. None of the claims were disclosed in the Debtor's bankruptcy schedules. The Trustee requested that the Debtor provide a list of her claims, and the underlying facts supporting each claim. With respect to the claim against Greyhound, the Trustee requested a copy of the report of missing property, which the Debtor testified had been filed or submitted to Greyhound.

4. Evidence of the Debtor's income. The Debtor testified that she earned wages from "Uptown Bucks" in the year 2008, but disclosed no such income in her bankruptcy schedules. The Trustee requested that she provide evidence of such income.

5. The Debtor's real estate. The Debtor testified that she owns real estate, and that the value of her interest in the real estate is $6,000.00. The Debtor further testified that the property had recently been transferred from the probate estate of the Debtor's aunt to the Debtor, and that the Debtor is a "fiduciary" of the probate estate. The Debtor also testified that a foreclosure lawsuit had been filed with respect to the real estate, but it was dismissed. The Debtor's bankruptcy schedules did not disclose the probate estate, secured creditor, or foreclosure lawsuit. The Trustee asked questions regarding the basis for the $6,000.00 value of the real estate, and requested that the Debtor cooperate with the Trustee's efforts to have a realtor look at the premises to determine if there is value for the benefit of creditors.

6. The Debtor's life insurance policy. The Debtor testified that she owns a whole life insurance policy with no value. The Trustee requested a copy of the policy.

7. The probate estate of the Debtor's aunt. Although the Debtor testified that she is a "fiduciary" with respect to a probate estate, no interest in a probate estate was disclosed in the Debtor's bankruptcy schedules. The Trustee requested that the Debtor provide the case number and documentation regarding the probate estate.

The trustee states further that a § 341 meeting is a public proceeding and that he leaves the door to the meeting room open to avoid distractions. He objects to creating a special procedure for this debtor.

B. The Meeting of Creditors

Bankruptcy code § 341(a) provides that a meeting of creditors is to be held in each case. 11 U.S.C. § 341. The debtor is required to appear at the meeting and be examined under oath by the chapter 7 trustee, creditors, and others. 11 U.S.C. § 343. The scope of the examination "may relate . . . to the acts, conduct, or property or to the liabilities and financial condition of the debtor, or to any other matter which may affect the administration of the debtor's estate, or to the debtor's right to a discharge." FED. R. BANKR. P. 2004(b).

The meeting of creditors "is a fishing expedition allowed, even encouraged, by the statutes and the rules so long as the subject of the questioning relates to the bankruptcy case." Clippard v. Russell (In re Russell), 392 B.R. 315, 358-59 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2008) (citing Chereton v. United States, 286 F.2d 409 (6th Cir. 1961)). The meeting "provides the trustee and creditors with a cheap, inexpensive, and convenient tool to get an overall feel for the bankruptcy estate, and to do so early in the case." In re Muy Bueno Corp., 257 B.R. 843, 851 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2001).

The meeting of creditors is a "formal part" of the bankruptcy case and members of the general public are presumed to be entitled to attend the meeting unless it can be shown that a significant competing interest outweighs that presumption. Baltimore Sun Co. v. Astri Invest. Mgmt. & Sec. Corp. (In re Astri Invest. Mgmt. & Sec. Corp.), 88 B.R. 730, 735 (Bankr. D. Md.1988); see also FED. R. BANKR. P. 2003(c) (providing that a debtor's § 341 examination shall be recorded and that the record be made available to the public).

C. A Debtor's Duties

In addition to appearing at the meeting of creditors, the debtor must provide the trustee with information about the debtor's overall financial situation, including income, assets, and liabilities. See 11 U.S.C. § 521, FED. R. BANKR. P. 1007 and 4002. This is not a matter of satisfying the chapter 7 trustee's idle curiosity; the trustee is required to investigate the debtor's financial affairs as part of the bankruptcy process. 11 U.S.C. § 704(a)(4). The code requires the debtor to "cooperate with the trustee as necessary to enable the trustee to perform the trustee's duties", 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(3), and to surrender to the trustee "all property of the estate and recorded information, including books, documents, records, and papers relating to property of the estate", 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(4). The code does not require the trustee to make information requests in writing. The debtor does not have the right to withhold information because she believes that it is not meaningful to her case. In re Russell, 392 B.R. at 358. The consequences to a debtor for withholding the information can be severe, up to and including denying the debtor a discharge. See 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(D) (providing for denial of discharge in cases where a debtor knowingly and fraudulently withholds such information from an officer of the estate).

DISCUSSION

The debtor's concerns fall into four areas: (1) the scope of the trustee's questions; (2) the public nature of the examination; (3) the trustee's approach to her compared to his treatment of another debtor; and (4) any further requests the trustee may make.

On the first point, the debtor resists being questioned about her house, car, pending lawsuit, and income source. These are all, however, legitimate sources of inquiry. The trustee is responsible for collecting and reducing to money property of the bankruptcy estate. 11...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex