Case Law In re Liebowitz, M-2-238

In re Liebowitz, M-2-238

Document Cited in Related
AMENDED ORDER
Katherine Polk Failla, Chair

This matter comes before the Committee on Grievances for the Southern District of New York (the "Committee") to consider the imposition of discipline against respondent Richard Liebowitz ("Respondent") based upon charges brought against him by the Committee on August 5, 2020 (the "Charges"), to which Respondent responded on September 25, 2020. Given the current status of the investigation as confidential, both the Charges and the investigation underlying their imposition are referenced without detail in this Order.

The full Committee (consisting of Chief Judge McMahon, Judges Castel, Daniels, Nathan, Stanton, Vyskocil, Magistrate Judges Aaron, Cott, and McCarthy, and the undersigned as Chair) has now reviewed Respondent's submission, as well as the record developed during the Committee's investigation. After careful deliberation, the Committee is unanimously of the view that the Charges are strongly supported by the record. What is more, the Committee is unanimously of the view that interim disciplinary measures against Respondent must be put in place immediately.

The preliminary remedy of an interim suspension is available to the Committee in situations where it is appropriate to protect the public from future disciplinary violations of a respondent during the pendency of proceedings before this Committee. The record in this case — which includes Respondent's repeated disregard for orders from this Court and his unwillingness to change despite 19 formal sanctions and...

2 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2021
Attorney Grievance Comm. for the First Judicial Dep't v. Giuliani (In re Giuliani)
"... ... where it is immediately necessary to protect the public from the respondent's violation of the Rules ( 22 NYCRR 1240.9 ; see Matter of Liebowitz , 503 F.Supp.3d 116 [S.D. N.Y. 2020] ). At bar, the AGC is proceeding on the basis that there is uncontroverted evidence of professional misconduct ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2020
Hunt Constr. Grp., Inc. v. Berkley Assurance Co.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2021
Attorney Grievance Comm. for the First Judicial Dep't v. Giuliani (In re Giuliani)
"... ... where it is immediately necessary to protect the public from the respondent's violation of the Rules ( 22 NYCRR 1240.9 ; see Matter of Liebowitz , 503 F.Supp.3d 116 [S.D. N.Y. 2020] ). At bar, the AGC is proceeding on the basis that there is uncontroverted evidence of professional misconduct ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2020
Hunt Constr. Grp., Inc. v. Berkley Assurance Co.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex