Sign Up for Vincent AI
In re N.Y.
Graeff, Shaw, McDonald, Robert N. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ.
On June 7, 2023, the Montgomery County Department of Social Services ("the Department") removed a two-year-old child, whom we shall refer to as "N.Y.",[1] from the home where she lived with her mother ("Mother"), due to concerns about Mother's mental health. The Department filed a Child in Need of Assistance ("CINA") petition and a request for emergency shelter care in the Montgomery County Circuit Court, sitting as the juvenile court.[2] The court granted the request for shelter care and scheduled an adjudicatory hearing on the CINA petition.
Following an adjudicatory hearing, the court found that it was contrary to N.Y.'s welfare for her to remain in Mother's custody. The court ruled, however, that N.Y. was not a child in need of assistance because N.Y.'s biological father ("Father"), who lived in another state, was able to give proper care and attention to N.Y.'s needs. Pursuant to § 3-819(e) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article ("CJP"), the court dismissed the CINA petition and placed N.Y. in the legal care and custody of Father. [3] Mother was granted supervised visitation.
In the petition filed on June 7, 2023, the Department alleged that it received a report that Mother, N.Y.'s sole caretaker was unable to care for N.Y. due to Mother's mental health concerns. According to the report, on June 6, 2023, Mother took N.Y. to an urgent care facility and to a hospital emergency room and reported that she and N.Y. had been "taken over" by a cult that had control over their minds and bodies. Mother claimed to hear "voices from the cult" and expressed a belief that the cult regulated N.Y.'s body temperature, caused N.Y. to develop premature pubic hair, and transferred a birthmark from Mother's body to N.Y.'s body. Mother was taken into custody for an emergency evaluation and was involuntarily hospitalized.
The Department alleged that it had contacted Father, who lived in Michigan, but, at that time, Father indicated he was not a resource for the child. The Department urged that placement was required to protect N.Y. from serious immediate danger, and requested that N.Y. be declared a child in need of assistance.
On July 3, 2023, the Department filed an amended petition which alleged that Father was willing to be the child's custodian, that he had been "vetted," and that he was found to be a suitable custodian. The Department requested that the court issue an order placing N.Y. in the care and custody of Father and awarding visitation to Mother and that the CINA case be closed.
The adjudication hearing on the Department's CINA petition was held on July 7, 2023. Mother was represented by counsel. Father was present via remote connection and was also represented by counsel. The Department called Jessica Jackson, an assessment social worker employed by the Department. Ms. Jackson testified as an expert in the field of social work, including safety and risk analysis. Mother was the only other witness to testify.
Through Ms. Jackson, the Department introduced evidence that, on June 30, 2022, Mother was forcibly removed from her home in Texas and hospitalized for a week. The hospital contacted Father and asked him to come to Texas and take custody of N.Y., who was being cared for by N.Y.'s maternal grandmother ("Grandmother"). Father traveled to Texas but, when he arrived, Grandmother avoided his calls.
Father picked Mother up from the hospital when she was discharged. He told Ms. Jackson that Mother was "acting fine" at that time, but, three days later, Mother began saying that Grandmother was "in a secret society." Mother regained custody of N.Y. and left Texas because, according to Father, she was no longer comfortable living in her apartment.
In October of 2022, the Department opened a "risk of harm" case after it received a referral advising that Mother left Texas and traveled to Maryland before the child welfare authority in Texas had completed its assessment. Ms. Jackson was assigned to contact Mother to ensure she was connected with the appropriate resources and support in Montgomery County. On October 20, 2022, Ms. Jackson met with Mother and N.Y. in a hotel room in Silver Spring. Ms. Jackson observed baby supplies and a car seat in the room. She had no concerns about N.Y.'s appearance.
Mother denied having any mental health issues or service needs. She told Ms. Jackson that she did not understand why she had been hospitalized in Texas in 2022. She claimed that she went to the hospital at that time only to "talk to someone[,]" and that she had been "misdiagnosed" with psychosis. Ms. Jackson provided Mother with local resources for outpatient mental health services, which Mother declined. The Department closed the risk of harm case in December of 2022 with recommendations that Mother utilize the referrals for mental health services.
Between April and June of 2023, Mother called 911 thirteen times with concerns about a "mind control cult." Undated body camera footage of Mother's encounter with Montgomery County police at her home was admitted into evidence and played for the court. The footage itself is not part of the record on appeal. To the extent the audio was not unintelligible, it was transcribed for the record. According to the transcript, Mother told the two police officers who responded to her home that she had been trying to contact police for about a week to "bring [the police] up to date." She said that "[t]hey can control people" although she did not explain who she meant by "they." She told police that "they" were able to "keep control of you" using strands of hair that were "engraved into the wall" of her apartment and a "yellow substance" that was "everywhere." She said, She said that she "just wanted somebody to come in and kind of document everything." Mother denied to police that she felt like hurting herself or anyone else. She said, Police concluded the encounter after assuring Mother that her concerns had been documented.
On May 31, 2023, Mother sent an email to Officer Jennifer Dougherty of the Montgomery County Police. Mother wrote: Mother then described events that she claimed had occurred in Texas in 2022.
Mother wrote that, in July 2022, she "started hearing a voice" that she recognized as the voice of her stepfather, Charles. According to Mother, Charles claimed to be a "sorcerer who molest[s] children," and told her that he had molested N.Y. Mother claimed her neighbor was sleeping with Charles "to get to a higher rank in their cult[,]" and was being paid by Charles to spy on her. She said that "random flies" started appearing in her house, and that Charles was "entering [her] home using these insects." She became "terrified" and left her apartment with N.Y. On the way to a hotel, her phone died "suddenly," and she felt "back to being controlled."
Mother explained to Officer Dougherty that she took N.Y. to several hotels in Texas, but the cult was "able to track [them] down" at each stop. Mother said that she "felt a horny sensation as if they were trying to touch [her.]" The cult was also "putting sensations" on N.'s "private area[.]" Mother wrote:
I started smelling weird scents, hearing noises coming from animals rustling. They started screaming in my ear saying I was god and my child was Jesus. We walked to the [gas station] across the street, trying to find someone who wasn't a child molester to help. The gas station clerk refused to let us stay inside.
Mother said "they" told her no one would help her because she did not "molest [her] child even after the sensation they put on [her]." Mother called the police for help, and the police offered her a ride home. Mother refused the ride because "they" told her that the police car had "something in it that would give them access to touch [her] child."
Mother concluded her email by offering to provide more details, if needed. Officer Dougherty acknowledged receipt of Mother's email and said she would review it.
On June 2, 2023, Mother emailed Officer Dougherty again. She wrote:
On June 5, 2023, Office Dougherty responded to Mother, stating:
Filing a police report is not going to protect you from these things. I was wondering if you would consider going to a doctor and tell them all the things you have been telling me. If this...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting