Sign Up for Vincent AI
In re Ozcelebi
David N. Calvillo, Jarrod B. Martin, Chamberlain Hrdlicka, Houston, TX, for Debtor.
Many professionals become involved in the administration of a bankruptcy case or in the representation of the debtor, debtor in possession, trustee, examiner, creditors or committees. The level of court review of the debtor's choice of an attorney varies, dependent upon the chapter for relief filed. In Chapter 11 cases, section 327(a) governs the employment of professionals by the debtor in possession or trustee. In a subchapter V case, however, section 1195 of The Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 modifies section 327(a) by providing that "a person is not disqualified for employment under section 327 of this title, by a debtor solely because that person holds a claim of less than $10,000 that arose prior to commencement of the case."1 What section 1195 does not answer is whether, in a subchapter V case, a non-disqualifying debtor's counsel is entitled to make a post-petition draw on a pre-petition retainer to pay a $9,999 pre-petition claim.
Here, the Court has been tasked with determining whether Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, P.C. may drawdown its pre-petition retainer in the amount of $69,394.48 which includes $9,999 in unbilled time notwithstanding Dr. K.V. Chowdary, M.D., individually and doing business as Valley Gastroenterology Clinic, P.A., and Valley Gastroenterology, Clinic, P.A.'s objections that the $9,999 is nothing more than a general unsecured claim which is likely avoidable as section 547 preference; and that the entire amount of $69,394.48 is subject a section 548 fraudulent transfer claim because Fatih Ozcelebi's medical practices, business real estate, and the vast majority of his earned income and other income for over a decade was fraudulently transferred to a so-called "spendthrift" trust that was in fact a self-settled trust.
On June 23, 2021, the Court held an evidentiary hearing and at the conclusion of the hearing ordered briefing and took the matter under advisement. All briefs have been submitted and the matter is ripe for determination. For the reasons set forth herein, Dr. K.V. Chowdary, M.D., individually and doing business as Valley Gastroenterology Clinic, P.A., and Valley Gastroenterology, Clinic, P.A.'s objections are overruled and Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, P.C.'s first fee statement and first interim application for compensation and expenses for the period from October 17, 2020 through March 31, 2021, seeking the amount of $188,358.11, of which $184,898.50 is for services rendered, and $3,459.61 is for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, are approved. Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, P.C may draw down the entirety of its $69,394.48 retainer which includes $9,999 in unbilled time. As for Dr. K.V. Chowdary, M.D., individually and doing business as Valley Gastroenterology Clinic, P.A., and Valley Gastroenterology, Clinic, P.A.'s objection that the first interim application includes fees that are duplicative of efforts and also excessive is left for another day as such objection has been reserved to such time as Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, P.C. files a final fee application and thus is not ripe for determination.
This Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7052, which incorporates Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 52 and 9014. To the extent that any finding of fact constitutes a conclusion of law, it is adopted as such. To the extent that any conclusion of law constitutes a finding of fact, it is adopted as such. This Court made certain oral findings and conclusions on the record. This Memorandum Opinion supplements those findings and conclusions. If there is an inconsistency, this Memorandum Opinion controls.
A. Procedural History
This Court holds jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and now exercises its jurisdiction in accordance with Southern District of Texas General Order 2012–6.30 Bankruptcy judges wield constitutional authority to issue final orders and judgments for core proceedings, but can only issue reports and recommendations for non-core proceedings, unless the parties consent to the entry of final orders or judgments on non-core matters.31 The application of Plaintiffs' counsel for allowance of compensation and reimbursement of expenses under 11 U.S.C. §§ 105, 327, 329, and 330, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 2014 and 2016, and Bankruptcy Local Rule 2014-1, arises under title 11.32 Accordingly, this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), and (O).
This Court may only hear a case in which venue is proper.33 28 U.S.C. § 1409(a) provides that "a proceeding arising under title 11 or arising in or related to a case u...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting