Case Law In re Smart

In re Smart

Document Cited in (1) Related

Harry D. Dixon, Donnie Dixon Attorney at Law, LLC, 24 Drayton Street Suite 1000, Savannah, Georgia 31401, for Appellant.

Wolanda R. Shelton, Paula J. Frederick, Jenny K. Mittelman, William Dallas NeSmith, State Bar of Georgia, 104 Marietta Street, NW Suite 100, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Don Smart (State Bar No. 653525), who was admitted to the State Bar of Georgia in 1975, has filed a petition for voluntary surrender of his license,1 see Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2), stating that on February 4, 2020, he entered a guilty plea in Chatham County Superior Court to one count of theft by conversion. He states further that the theft charge arose from his conduct in the administration of an estate, in the course of which he sold real property on the estate's behalf, deposited the sales proceeds, totaling $509,618.68, into his trust account, and then, rather than disbursing the funds to the estate, converted the funds to his own use. Smart admits that, by his conduct, he has violated the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). Specifically, Smart's admitted conduct constitutes a violation of Rules 1.15 (I) (c), 1.15 (II) (b), and 8.4 (a) (2), the maximum sanction for any of which is disbarment. The State Bar has filed a response, asking the Court to accept the petition.

Having reviewed the petition and response, we agree to accept Smart's petition for voluntary surrender of his license, which is tantamount to disbarment. See Rule 1.0 (r). Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the name of Don Smart be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Smart is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219...

1 cases
Document | Georgia Supreme Court – 2020
Priester v. State.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
1 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 73-1, September 2021
Legal Ethics
"...and admission in judicio of a criminal act that adversely reflects upon a lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness). 27. In re Smart, 309 Ga. 336, 845 S.E.2d 688 (2020).28. Id.29. In re Lain, 311 Ga. 427, 857 S.E.2d 668 (2021).30. Id. at 436-38, 857 S.E.2d at 675.31. In re Dean, 310 Ga..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 73-1, September 2021
Legal Ethics
"...and admission in judicio of a criminal act that adversely reflects upon a lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness). 27. In re Smart, 309 Ga. 336, 845 S.E.2d 688 (2020).28. Id.29. In re Lain, 311 Ga. 427, 857 S.E.2d 668 (2021).30. Id. at 436-38, 857 S.E.2d at 675.31. In re Dean, 310 Ga..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
Document | Georgia Supreme Court – 2020
Priester v. State.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex