In re Viktor T.

2023 NY Slip Op 06142

In the Matter of Viktor T. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Gustavo T. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Vassilisa T. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Gustavo T. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Armando T. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Gustavo T. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 3.)

Nos. 2022-02847, 2022-04426, Docket Nos. N-16108-19, N-16109-19 N-16110-19

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

November 29, 2023

Fariah Amin, Long Island City, NY, for appellant.

Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Melanie T West and Mackenzie Fillow of counsel), for respondent.

Twyla Carter, New York, NY (Dawne A. Mitchell, Diane Pazar, and Michelle Rattoballi of counsel), attorney for the children Viktor T. and Armando T.

The Children's Law Center, Brooklyn, NY (Laura Solecki and Janet Neustaetter of counsel), attorney for the child Vassilisa T.

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, LINDA CHRISTOPHER JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10 the father appeals from (1) an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Kings County (Erik S. Pitchal, J.), dated April 1, 2022, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court dated May 9, 2022. The order of fact-finding, after a fact-finding hearing, found that the father sexually abused and neglected the child Vassilisa T. and derivatively abused and neglected the children Viktor T. and Armando T. The order of disposition, insofar as appealed from, upon the order of fact-finding and after a dispositional hearing, directed the father to complete a sex offender treatment program.

ORDERED that the appeal from the order of fact-finding is dismissed without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order of disposition and is brought up for review on the appeal from the order of disposition; and it is further, ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced these proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, alleging that the father sexually abused and neglected the child Vassilisa T. and derivatively abused and neglected her two brothers, the children Viktor T. and Armando T. After a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court found that the father sexually abused and neglected Vassilisa T. and derivatively abused and neglected her brothers.

The father waived his objection to the Family Court's consideration of Vassilisa T.'s medical records at the fact-finding hearing when he consented to their admission into evidence at the hearing (see generally ...