Case Law Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump

Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump

Document Cited Authorities (201) Cited in (178) Related (1)

ARGUED: Jeffrey Bryan Wall, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Omar C. Jadwat, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, New York, New York, for Appellees.

ON BRIEF: Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, August E. Flentje, Special Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General, Douglas N. Letter, Sharon Swingle, H. Thomas Byron III, Lowell V. Sturgill, Jr., Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Justin B. Cox, Atlanta, Georgia, Karen C. Tumlin, Nicholas Espíritu, Melissa S. Keaney, Esther Sung, Marielena Hincapié, NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER, Los Angeles, California; Lee Gelernt, Hina Shamsi, Hugh Handeyside, Sarah L. Mehta, Spencer E. Amdur, New York, New York, Cecillia D. Wang, Cody H. Wofsy, San Francisco, California, David Cole, Daniel Mach, Heather L. Weaver, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Washington, D.C.; David Rocah, Deborah A. Jeon, Sonia Kumar, Nicholas Taichi Steiner, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Ken Paxton, Attorney General, Jeffrey C. Mateer, First Assistant Attorney General, Scott A. Keller, Solicitor General, J. Campbell Barker, Deputy Solicitor General, Ari Cuenin, Assistant Solicitor General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, Austin, Texas; Steven T. Marshall, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALABAMA, Montgomery, Alabama; Mark Brnovich, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARIZONA, Phoenix, Arizona; Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARKANSAS, Little Rock, Arkansas; Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA, Tallahassee, Florida; Derek Schmidt, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS, Topeka, Kansas; Jeff Landry, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF LOUISIANA, Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Tim Fox, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MONTANA, Helena, Montana;

Mike Hunter, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Alan Wilson, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina; Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Pierre, South Dakota; Patrick Morrisey, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia; Phil Bryant, Governor, OFFICE OF GOVERNOR PHIL BRYANT, Jackson, Mississippi, for Amici States of Texas, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, West Virginia, and Governor Phil Bryant of the State of Mississippi. Robert D. Fram, Alexandra P. Grayner, Kathryn Bi, San Francisco, California, Kevin B. Collins, William E. Zapf, Ligia M. Markman, Karun Tilak, Michael Baker, Andrew Guy, COVINGTON & BURLING LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Interfaith Coalition. Thomas J. Perrelli, Lindsay C. Harrison, Erica L. Ross, Tassity S. Johnson, JENNER & BLOCK LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Colleges and Universities.

Jay Alan Sekulow, Stuart J. Roth, Colby M. May, Andrew J. Ekonomou, Jordon Sekulow, Craig L. Parshall, Matthew R. Clark, Benjamin P. Sisney, Washington, D.C., Edward L. White III, Erik M. Zimmerman, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Francis J. Manion, Geoffrey R. Surtees, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, New Hope, Kentucky, for Amicus American Center for Law and Justice. Kimberly S. Hermann, SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, Marietta, Georgia; William S. Consovoy, CONSOVOY MCCARTHY PARK PLLC, Arlington, Virginia, for Amicus Southeastern Legal Foundation. Kenneth A. Klukowski,

AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS UNION, Alexandria, Virginia, for Amicus American Civil Rights Union. Joseph W. Miller, UNITED STATES ...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2020
City of Columbus v. Trump
"...no jurisdiction of a bill to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties." ’ " Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump , 857 F.3d 554, 605 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc)(vacated as moot , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 353, 199 L.Ed.2d 203 (2017) ) (quoting Franklin , 505 U.S. at..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2020
Casa De Md., Inc. v. Wolf
"...patchwork application. Cf. Casa de Maryland, Inc. v. Trump , 414 F. Supp. 3d 760, 785 (D. Md. 2019) (quoting Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554, 605 (4th Cir.), as amended (June 15, 2017), vacated and remanded on other grounds sub nom. , Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistanc..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2017
Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump
"...part affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc . Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump ("IRAP" ), 857 F.3d 554 (4th Cir. 2017). In light of the expiration of EO–2, the Fourth Circuit's judgment has since been vacated as moot by the United Sta..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina – 2020
Middleton v. Andino
"...Virginian Ry. Co. v. Sys. Fed'n No. 40, 300 U.S. 515, 552, 57 S. Ct. 592, 81 L. Ed. 789 (1937) ). Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump , 857 F.3d 554, 602 (4th Cir. 2017). 63. A court considering whether to grant a preliminary injunction must therefore "balance the competing claims of ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2019
City of S.F. v. Sessions
"...of powers, which supports nationwide relief. City & Cty. of San Francisco , 897 F.3d at 1232 ; see also Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump , 857 F.3d 554, 605 (4th Cir. 2017) (finding that relief limited to the parties in suit where there was a likely constitutional violation "would ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 71-1, 2021
Bias and Immigration: a New Factors Test to Examine Extrinsic Evidence of Animus in Immigration Cases
"...U.S. 252, 264-66 (1977) (citing Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 242 (1976)).232. See, e.g., Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554 (4th Cir. 2017), vacated, Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project, 138 S. Ct. 353 (2017).233. See Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colo. C.R...."
Document | Vol. 95 Núm. 5, May 2020 – 2020
ONLY WHERE JUSTIFIED: TOWARD LIMITS AND EXPLANATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS.
"...(9th Cir. Jan. 4, 2018) (mem.); Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 241 F. Supp. 3d 539, 565-66 (D. Md.), aff'd in relevant part, 857 F.3d 554, 605 (4th Cir.) (en banc), stay granted in part by 137 S. Ct. 2080, 2089 (2017) (per curiam) (as to foreign nationals lacking a bona fide rel..."
Document | – 2024
BRUEN'S ENFORCEMENT PUZZLE: UNEARTHING AND ADJUDICATING THE HISTORICAL ENFORCEMENT RECORD IN SECOND AMENDMENT CASES.
"...472 U.S. 38, 58 (1985) (relying on "unrebutted evidence of legislative intent" (emphasis added)). (79) See Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554, 601 (4th Cir.) ("EO-2 cannot be divorced from the cohesive narrative linking it to the animus that inspired it."), vacated as m..."
Document | Núm. 105-3, March 2020 – 2020
How Nationwide Injunctions Have Thwarted Recent Immigration Policy
"...(per curiam)). 82 . Id. at 564. 83 . Id. at 565 (citations omitted). 84 . Id. at 566. 85 . See generally Int’l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554 (4th Cir. 2017) (issuing an opinion affirming in part and vacating in part on the date provided above), vacated and remanded , 138..."
Document | Núm. 35-2, January 2021 – 2021
Co-opting Coronavirus, Assailing Asylum
"...to determine if an administrative judgment is impermissibly inf‌lected by politics.”). 99. Int’l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554, 590–91 (4th Cir. 2017), vacating as moot 138 S. Ct. 353 (2017) (citing Kerry v. Din, 135 S. Ct. 2128, 2141 (2015) (Kennedy, J., concurring) (“[..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
1 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2017
Administrative Procedure Act Litigation: The Changing Regulatory Landscape, the Role of Industry, and Emerging Issues
"...Cir. 2017); Hawaii v. Trump, --- F.3d ---, 2017 WL 2529640, *27-*28 (9th Cir. June 12, 2017). 31 See International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554 (4th Cir. 2017). 32 See, e.g., Los Angeles Haven Hospice, Inc. v. Sebelius, 638 F.3d 644, 664-65 (9th Cir. 2011) (collecting a..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 71-1, 2021
Bias and Immigration: a New Factors Test to Examine Extrinsic Evidence of Animus in Immigration Cases
"...U.S. 252, 264-66 (1977) (citing Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 242 (1976)).232. See, e.g., Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554 (4th Cir. 2017), vacated, Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project, 138 S. Ct. 353 (2017).233. See Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colo. C.R...."
Document | Vol. 95 Núm. 5, May 2020 – 2020
ONLY WHERE JUSTIFIED: TOWARD LIMITS AND EXPLANATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS.
"...(9th Cir. Jan. 4, 2018) (mem.); Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 241 F. Supp. 3d 539, 565-66 (D. Md.), aff'd in relevant part, 857 F.3d 554, 605 (4th Cir.) (en banc), stay granted in part by 137 S. Ct. 2080, 2089 (2017) (per curiam) (as to foreign nationals lacking a bona fide rel..."
Document | – 2024
BRUEN'S ENFORCEMENT PUZZLE: UNEARTHING AND ADJUDICATING THE HISTORICAL ENFORCEMENT RECORD IN SECOND AMENDMENT CASES.
"...472 U.S. 38, 58 (1985) (relying on "unrebutted evidence of legislative intent" (emphasis added)). (79) See Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554, 601 (4th Cir.) ("EO-2 cannot be divorced from the cohesive narrative linking it to the animus that inspired it."), vacated as m..."
Document | Núm. 105-3, March 2020 – 2020
How Nationwide Injunctions Have Thwarted Recent Immigration Policy
"...(per curiam)). 82 . Id. at 564. 83 . Id. at 565 (citations omitted). 84 . Id. at 566. 85 . See generally Int’l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554 (4th Cir. 2017) (issuing an opinion affirming in part and vacating in part on the date provided above), vacated and remanded , 138..."
Document | Núm. 35-2, January 2021 – 2021
Co-opting Coronavirus, Assailing Asylum
"...to determine if an administrative judgment is impermissibly inf‌lected by politics.”). 99. Int’l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554, 590–91 (4th Cir. 2017), vacating as moot 138 S. Ct. 353 (2017) (citing Kerry v. Din, 135 S. Ct. 2128, 2141 (2015) (Kennedy, J., concurring) (“[..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2020
City of Columbus v. Trump
"...no jurisdiction of a bill to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties." ’ " Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump , 857 F.3d 554, 605 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc)(vacated as moot , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 353, 199 L.Ed.2d 203 (2017) ) (quoting Franklin , 505 U.S. at..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2020
Casa De Md., Inc. v. Wolf
"...patchwork application. Cf. Casa de Maryland, Inc. v. Trump , 414 F. Supp. 3d 760, 785 (D. Md. 2019) (quoting Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554, 605 (4th Cir.), as amended (June 15, 2017), vacated and remanded on other grounds sub nom. , Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistanc..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2017
Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump
"...part affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc . Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump ("IRAP" ), 857 F.3d 554 (4th Cir. 2017). In light of the expiration of EO–2, the Fourth Circuit's judgment has since been vacated as moot by the United Sta..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina – 2020
Middleton v. Andino
"...Virginian Ry. Co. v. Sys. Fed'n No. 40, 300 U.S. 515, 552, 57 S. Ct. 592, 81 L. Ed. 789 (1937) ). Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump , 857 F.3d 554, 602 (4th Cir. 2017). 63. A court considering whether to grant a preliminary injunction must therefore "balance the competing claims of ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2019
City of S.F. v. Sessions
"...of powers, which supports nationwide relief. City & Cty. of San Francisco , 897 F.3d at 1232 ; see also Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump , 857 F.3d 554, 605 (4th Cir. 2017) (finding that relief limited to the parties in suit where there was a likely constitutional violation "would ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2017
Administrative Procedure Act Litigation: The Changing Regulatory Landscape, the Role of Industry, and Emerging Issues
"...Cir. 2017); Hawaii v. Trump, --- F.3d ---, 2017 WL 2529640, *27-*28 (9th Cir. June 12, 2017). 31 See International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554 (4th Cir. 2017). 32 See, e.g., Los Angeles Haven Hospice, Inc. v. Sebelius, 638 F.3d 644, 664-65 (9th Cir. 2011) (collecting a..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial