Case Law Island County v. Cosmic Light Creations

Island County v. Cosmic Light Creations

Document Cited Authorities (12) Cited in Related

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

DWYER J.

Acting pro se, Olga Nada Tepes appeals a judgment and order of sale foreclosing on a tax lien on real property located in Island County. Although Tepes' arguments are difficult to follow in the manner she presents them, it is reasonably clear that she contends that the property foreclosed upon was exempt from taxation. She also appears to claim that the statutes authorizing the assessment and collection of property taxes are unconstitutionally vague and challenges the trial court's jurisdiction. We affirm.

I

In August 2015, Island County initiated a property tax lien foreclosure proceeding. The proceeding involved numerous parcels of property, including real property designated as "Item No. 46" in a certificate of delinquency filed by the Island County Treasurer. The certificate of delinquency listed both the appellant, Olga Nada Tepes [1] and an entity, Cosmic Light Creations, as the property owners and lien or interest holders. The certificate of delinquency identified approximately $4, 400 in unpaid property taxes assessed in 2012, interest, and costs.[2] The County notified Tepes of the foreclosure action by publication and by certified mail.

In September 2015, Tepes filed several documents in apparent response to the County's complaint. These documents included a "Declaration of Denial of Due Process by Olga Nada Tepes" and an "Affidavit of Status of Olga Nada Tepes: Private Citizen of the United States: American Inhabitant." Tepes asserted a variety of confusing and often internally inconsistent arguments as to why the property tax provisions set forth in Title 84 RCW did not apply to her or to the property identified as Item No. 46.

On November 9, 2015, the court entered a default judgment against all property owners, including Tepes, who were listed in the certificate of delinquency and failed to exercise their right of redemption. After a summary proceeding hearing under RCW 84.64.080(1) on November 16, the court entered findings and a separate judgment and order of sale.

Just before the scheduled sale date of December 8, 2015, Tepes filed additional documents, including a "Notice of Constitutional Challenge to Statute, " and a "Memorandum in law on Property Tax." Around the same time, Tepes informed the County that she was not notified of the November 16 hearing. The County also became aware that notice of that hearing was not sent to the address where Tepes received the original pleadings by certified mail. The County terminated the sale of the property.

The County renoted a hearing and sent notice to Tepes at all addresses known to the County. A second summary proceeding hearing took place on January 20, 2016. Tepes filed a document a few days before the hearing, but did not appear. On the date of the hearing, the court received and filed a faxed document from Tepes which purported to explain her absence from court. The documents included hospital discharge notes, indicating that Tepes was admitted to the hospital on January 11, 2016, and instructing her to take medication "as needed" and to schedule a follow up appointment with a surgeon within two weeks. In a handwritten note, Tepes stated that she was unable to attend any court proceedings "[d]ue to surgery and medications."

The court entered amended findings and conclusions and an amended order and judgment of sale. Among other things, the court found that the property designated as Item No. 46 was subject to taxation, that property taxes were properly assessed, and that as of August 2015 when the County issued the certificate of delinquency, the 2012 property taxes had not been paid.

The court entered conclusions of law, including the following:

1. That this Court has jurisdiction in this matter and the Notice and Summons was served or notice was given in a manner reasonably calculated to inform the owner or owners and any person having a recorded interest in or lien of record upon the property of the foreclosure action.
2. Although an appearance was filed by Olga Nada on September 11, 2015, and more filings were received by the Court on December 2 and December 7, 2015, and on January 13, 2016, no Answer was ever filed and nothing in the pleadings filed presents a valid defense against the relief sought by Island County for unpaid delinquent property taxes owed.

After entry of these orders, Tepes filed more documents, including a "Notice to Vacate." Following a hearing, the court denied the motion on numerous grounds. Specifically the court concluded that Tepes was properly notified of the January 2016 hearing and that "[t]he assessment of real property and collection of real property taxes in Washington state are authorized under Title 84 RCW and supported by Article VII, Section I of the Washington State Constitution." The court further concluded that Tepes had not paid her delinquent property taxes nor "raised any valid defenses to the Court to justify the non-payment of such taxes." The court gave Tepes a final opportunity to avoid foreclosure by paying the delinquent amounts to the Island County Treasurer and, if she failed to do so, allowed the County to proceed with the sale of the property. Tepes appeals.

II

As an initial matter, according to Tepes' opening brief and documents filed below, the property at issue was purchased not by Tepes, but by "Cosmic Light Creations, " a "private religious corporation sole" to provide housing for the minister. "Washington law, with limited exception, requires individuals appearing before the court on behalf of another party to be...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex