Case Law Johnson v. McWilliams

Johnson v. McWilliams

Document Cited Authorities (3) Cited in (1) Related

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, NY, for appellant.

Gary E. Eisenberg, New City, NY, for respondent.

Donna E. Abrams, White Plains, NY, attorney for the child.

ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Putnam County (Joseph J. Spofford, Jr., J.), dated February 14, 2022. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a hearing, granted that branch of the mother's petition which was, in effect, to modify the parental access provisions of a stipulation of settlement dated September 11, 2019, which was incorporated but not merged into the parties' judgment of divorce, so as to require the father to provide the mother with 48 hours' notice in writing of his requests for additional weekday or overnight parental access with the parties' child.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The parties are the parents of one child. Pursuant to a stipulation of settlement dated September 11, 2019, which was incorporated but not merged into the parties' judgment of divorce, the parties agreed to share joint legal custody of the child, with physical custody to the mother and parental access to the father every other weekend and "[s]uch other times as the [mother] and the [father] may agree." In January 2021, the mother filed a petition to modify the parental access provisions of the stipulation of settlement, inter alia, in effect, so as to require the father to provide her with 48 hours' notice in writing via email or text of his requests for additional weekday or overnight parental access with the child. After a fact-finding hearing, in an order dated February 14, 2022, the Family Court, among other things, granted that branch of the mother's petition. The father appeals.

"In order to modify an existing custody or parental access arrangement, there must be a showing of a change in circumstances such that modification is required to protect the best interests of the child" ( Matter of LaPera v. Restivo, 202 A.D.3d 788, 789, 158 N.Y.S.3d 858 ; see Matter of Soper v. Soper, 203 A.D.3d 1162, 163 N.Y.S.3d 417 ). "The paramount concern when making such a determination is the best interests of the child under the totality of the circumstances" ( Matter of Soper v. Soper, 203 A.D.3d at 1163, 163 N.Y.S.3d 417 [internal quotation marks omitted]). "The determination of appropriate parental access is entrusted to the...

2 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
N.Y. Foundling Hosp. v. Troy A.H. (In re Anton T.H.)
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
Marum v. Graffeo
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
N.Y. Foundling Hosp. v. Troy A.H. (In re Anton T.H.)
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
Marum v. Graffeo
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex