Case Law Jones v. State

Jones v. State

Document Cited Authorities (4) Cited in (9) Related

Jason Dalton Treadaway, for Appellant.

Marlene Shari Zekser, Daniel J. Porter, Lawrenceville, for Appellee.

McMillian, Judge.

Charles Robert Withrow Jones appeals from his conviction on a single count of violating the State Sexual Offender Registry statute, OCGA § 42-1-12 (f) (4). Jones asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, the trial court erred in admitting evidence in support of an allegation not contained in the indictment, and the trial court erred in allowing the State to impermissibly shift the burden of proof to him. Because we find that the evidence was insufficient to support Jones's conviction, we reverse.

OCGA § 42-1-12 (f) (4) requires that any sexual offender required to register under the statute must "[r]enew the required registration information with the sheriff of the county in which the sexual offender resides or sleeps by reporting in person to the sheriff within 72 hours prior to such offender's birthday each year to be photographed and fingerprinted." The indictment charged that Jones, who previously had been convicted of statutory rape, failed "to report to the appropriate sheriff's office, to wit: the Gwinnett County Sheriff's Office" within 72 hours prior to his birthday on September 26, 2015.

In considering Jones's appeal,

[w]e view the evidence on appeal in the light most favorable to the verdict, and no longer presume the defendant is innocent. We do not weigh the evidence or decide the witnesses' credibility, but only determine if the evidence is sufficient to sustain the convictions. We construe the evidence and all reasonable inferences from the evidence most strongly in favor of the [factfinder's] verdict.

(Citation omitted.) Frazier v. State , 339 Ga.App. 405, 406, 793 S.E.2d 580 (2016). See also Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

So viewed, the evidence at trial showed that Jones was convicted of statutory rape and interference with custody in 2004, which required that he be listed on a sex offender registry for life.1 At some point, Jones moved to Gwinnett County, and it is undisputed that he registered on the sex offender registry in that county. On March 18, 2015, the Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department verified that he was residing in Gwinnett County at the address listed on the registry, but no evidence was presented indicating that his address was verified after that date.

Jones's birthday is September 26. On September 18, 2015, he signed a lease for a house in Walton County, and he testified at trial that he began moving into that house on Wednesday, September 23, 2015 by moving his bed and clothing there. Jones stated that he began sleeping at the Walton County address that night, but he waited until Saturday, September 26, to move his heavier things when he could get help with the move.2

On Friday, September 25, 2015, Jones reported to the Walton County Sheriff's Department to register on that county's sex offender registry. At the time, Jones told the Walton County deputy who assisted him with the registration that "he had not completely moved in, still had a few things." As a result, the deputy noted on the registration form, "just moving in over weekend." The form listed the Walton County house as Jones's primary address and his Gwinnett County address as his temporary address. However, the Walton County officer primarily responsible for the sex offender registry was on vacation on September 25 and the fingerprinting and photographic equipment was locked in her office, so the registration process could not be completed that day. Jones returned on September 30, the first day the officer was back at work, for fingerprinting and to have his picture taken in order to complete the process.

Nevertheless, it is undisputed that Jones did not report his move to Walton County to the Gwinnett County Sheriff's office, and he did not renew his registration there. Therefore, at the time of Jones's birthday, Gwinnett County records indicated that he continued to reside in Gwinnett County. As a result, he...

4 cases
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2020
Young v. State
"...and 9:00 a.m. Additionally, Young's first-appearance hearing was conducted at 8:20 a.m. on August 4, 2017.13 See Jones v. State , 340 Ga. App. 398, 400, 797 S.E.2d 653 (2017) (reversing conviction when State failed to present sufficient evidence that defendant failed to register as a sex of..."
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2017
All Am. Quality Foods, Inc. v. Smith
"..."
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2020
Smart v. State
"...and every essential element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Jones v. State , 340 Ga. App. 398, 400, 797 S.E.2d 653 (2017). It was the State's burden to prove that Smart was required to register as a sex offender due to his Michigan convic..."
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2020
Amosu v. State
"...criminal law.’ "), quoting Coffin v. United States , 156 U. S. 432, 453, 15 S.Ct. 394, 39 L.Ed. 481 (1895).10 See Jones v. State , 340 Ga. App. 398, 400, 797 S.E.2d 653 (2017) ("The burden of proof rests upon the State to prove every material allegation of the indictment and every essential..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2020
Young v. State
"...and 9:00 a.m. Additionally, Young's first-appearance hearing was conducted at 8:20 a.m. on August 4, 2017.13 See Jones v. State , 340 Ga. App. 398, 400, 797 S.E.2d 653 (2017) (reversing conviction when State failed to present sufficient evidence that defendant failed to register as a sex of..."
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2017
All Am. Quality Foods, Inc. v. Smith
"..."
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2020
Smart v. State
"...and every essential element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Jones v. State , 340 Ga. App. 398, 400, 797 S.E.2d 653 (2017). It was the State's burden to prove that Smart was required to register as a sex offender due to his Michigan convic..."
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2020
Amosu v. State
"...criminal law.’ "), quoting Coffin v. United States , 156 U. S. 432, 453, 15 S.Ct. 394, 39 L.Ed. 481 (1895).10 See Jones v. State , 340 Ga. App. 398, 400, 797 S.E.2d 653 (2017) ("The burden of proof rests upon the State to prove every material allegation of the indictment and every essential..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex