50 California St., Suite 2800
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-743-6900
400 South Hope Street, 8th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
213-896-2400
Jennifer Hernandez (jennifer.hernandez@hklaw.com)
Amanda Monchamp (amanda.monchamp@hklaw.com)
Joanna Meldrum
www.hklaw.com
Judicial Review of Categorical Exemptions from 1997-Present
August 2012
This report reviews all California Court of Appeal and Supreme Court decisions that have
analyzed categorical exemptions under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) from
1997 through the present. This research was conducted to determine how often the courts
uphold agencies' categorical exemption determinations. The database of cases surveyed
included all CEQA decisions that mentioned the phrases "categorical exemption," "categorically
exempt" or just "categoric" with a root extender in the search term. The report excludes cases
that only either mentioned categorical exemptions in dicta or were resolved on other issues
(e.g., procedural issues, exempt under a statutory exemption, etc.).
For the most part, courts conduct a two-step evaluation to determine if a project is
categorically exempt. The first step considers whether the project fits within one of the listed
categorical exemptions. 14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15301-15333. If the court
finds that the exemption applies, it then considers whether the project triggers any of the
exceptions to the exemptions. 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15300.2. If the
exceptions to the exemption do not apply, the court upholds the categorical exemption and the
agency is not required to perform any further CEQA review of that project.
Since CEQA's categorical exemptions were created, a total of 43 cases have addressed
categorical exemptions, including 21 cases decided after January 1, 1997. The report found
that the courts upheld categorical exemption determinations in 10 out of 21 cases (48%).
