Case Law Kampschroer v. Anoka Cnty.

Kampschroer v. Anoka Cnty.

Document Cited Authorities (34) Cited in (28) Related

Jonathan A. Strauss, Lorenz F. Fett, Jr., Mark H. Zitzewitz, Sonia L. Miller–Van Oort, Kenneth H. Fukuda, Sapientia Law Group PLLC, Jeffrey M. Montpetit, Susan M. Holden, Sieben Grose Von Holtum & Carey, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiffs.

Bryan D. Frantz, Anoka County Attorney's Office, Anoka, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant Anoka County.

John K. Iverson, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendants City of Anoka, City of Apple Valley, City of Arlington, City of Baxter, City of Belle Plaine, City of Blaine, City of Bloomington, City of Braham, City of Brooklyn Center, City of Brooklyn Park, City of Brownton, City of Burnsville, City of Cambridge, City of Cannon Falls, Centennial Lakes Police Department, City of Champlin, City of Chaska, City of Chisago, City of Columbia Heights, City of Corcoran, City of Cottage Grove, City of Crosby, City of Crystal, City of Deephaven, City of Dundas, City of Eagan, City of Eden Prairie, City of Elk River, City of Fairmont, City of Faribault, City of Farmington, City of Foley, City of Forest Lake, City of Fridley, City of Glencoe, City of Golden Valley, City of Goodview, City of Hastings, City of Hopkins, City of Howard Lake, City of Hutchinson, City of Inver Grove Heights, City of Isanti, City of Jordan, City of Lakeville, City of Litchfield, City of Mankato, City of Maple Grove, City of Maplewood, City of Medina, City of Minnetonka, City of Montgomery, City of Moorhead, City of Morristown, City of Mounds View, City of New Brighton, City of New Hope, City of New Prague, City of Newport, City of North Saint Paul, City of North Mankato, City of Northfield, City of Owatonna, City of Prior Lake, City of Ramsey, City of Richfield, City of Robbinsdale, City of Rochester, City of Rosemount, City of Roseville, City of Sartell, City of Savage, City of Shakopee, City of Spring Lake Park, City of Saint Cloud, City of Saint Louis Park, City of Staples, City of Stillwater, City of West Saint Paul, City of Waite Park, City of Wayzata, City of White Bear Lake, City of Woodbury, City of Coon Rapids, Dakota Communications Center, City of Mendota Heights, City of Saint Anthony, City of Saint Francis, City of Saint Paul Park, and City of Saint Peter.

Jamie L. Guderian, Joseph E. Flynn, Jardine Logan & O'Brien PLLP, Lake Elmo, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendants Beltrami County, Benton County, Blue Earth County, Carver County, Cass County, Chisago County, Crow Wing County, Faribault County, Fillmore County, Goodhue County, Grant County, Hubbard County, Isanti County, Kanabec County, Lakes Area Police Department, Le Sueur County, McLeod County, Mille Lacs County, Morrison County, Nicollet County, Rice County, Scott County, Sherburne County, Stearns County, Steele County, Wadena County, Washington County, Winona County, Wright County, Yellow Medicine County, and Pine County.

Amelia N. Jadoo, Helen R. Brosnahan, Andrea G. White, Dakota County Attorney's Office, Hastings, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant Dakota County.

Mark P. Hodkinson, Bassford Remele, PA, Minneapolis, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant City of Edina.

Toni A. Beitz, Beth A. Stack, Daniel D. Kaczor, Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Minneapolis, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant Hennepin County.

C. Lynne Fundingsland, Kristin R. Sarff, Minneapolis City Attorney's Office, Minneapolis, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant City of Minneapolis.

Ann E. Walther, Daniel A. Louismet, Karin E. Peterson, Rice Michels & Walther LLP, Minneapolis, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board.

Timothy R. Schupp, Ryan O. Vettleson, Gaskins, Bennett, Birrell, Schupp, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant Metropolitan Airports Commission.

Douglas A. Boese, Gregory J. Griffiths, Jennifer Marie Peterson, Dunlap & Seeger, PA, Rochester, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant Olmstead County.

Kimberly R. Parker, Robert B. Roche, Ramsey County Attorney's Office, Saint Paul, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant Ramsey County.

Charles K. Maier, Gray Plant Mooty, Minneapolis, MN, Todd L. Nissen, Drawe & Maland, Edina, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant Rochester Motors LLC.

Nick D. Campanario, Saint Louis County Attorney's Office, Duluth, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant Saint Louis County.

Cheri M. Sisk, City of Saint Paul Attorney's Office, Saint Paul, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant City of Saint Paul.

Oliver J. Larson, Minnesota Attorney General's Office, Saint Paul, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendants Michael Campion, Ramona Dohman, and Pat McCormack.

Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendants John and Jane Doe (1–1500), Entity Does (1–50), and DPS Does.

Daniel L. Abelson, Metropolitan Council, Saint Paul, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Bloomington, MN, for Defendant Metropolitan Council.

SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendants Michael Campion, Ramona Dohman, and Pat McCormack's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 54] and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 131]; (2) Defendant Rochester Motors' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 76]; (3) Defendant Metropolitan Council's Motion to Dismiss or Sever [Doc. No. 104]; (4) Defendant Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board's Motion to Dismiss or Sever [Doc. No. 138]; (5) Defendant Metropolitan Airports Commission's Motion to Dismiss or Sever [Doc. No. 141]; (6) Defendant Ramsey County's Motion to Dismiss or Sever [Doc. No. 88]; (7) Defendant Anoka County's ...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2020
Krekelberg v. Anoka Cnty.
"...functions," such as when the person targeted is not an interested party in any law enforcement matter. Kampschroer v. Anoka Cty. , 57 F. Supp. 3d 1124, 1140-41 (D. Minn. 2014), aff'd , 840 F.3d 961 (8th Cir. 2016) ; see also McDonough , 799 F.3d at 944 n.6 ("The words of the DPPA alone are ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2015
Karasov v. Caplan Law Firm, P.A., Case No. 14–cv–1503 SRN/BRT.
"...at *2 (D.Minn. Feb. 21, 2014) ; Rasmusson v. Chisago County, 991 F.Supp.2d 1065, 1079 (D.Minn.2014) ; Kampschroer v. Anoka Cnty., 57 F.Supp.3d 1124, 1136–38, No. 13–cv–2512 (SRN/TNL), 2014 WL 5530590, at *6–7 (D.Minn. Nov. 3, 2014) ; Kost v. Hunt, 983 F.Supp.2d 1121, 1126–30 (D.Minn.2013) (..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2021
Armstrong v. City of Minneapolis
"...and belief, without more, is insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim." Kampschroer v. Anoka Cty. , 57 F. Supp. 3d 1124, 1143 (D. Minn. 2014), aff'd , 840 F.3d 961 (8th Cir. 2016) (citing Solis v. City of Fresno , No. 1:11-cv-00053, 2012 WL 868681, at *8 (E.D..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2019
Wickstrom v. City of Moose Lake
"...contact with law enforcement through their work but never as an interested party in a law enforcement matter (Kampschroer v. Anoka Cty., 57 F.Supp.3d 1124, 1134 (D. Minn. 2014), aff'd, 840 F.3d 961 (8th Cir. 2016)). A search by driver's license number, as opposed to a search by name, reason..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2021
Cole v. Doe
"...the Court will apply the Twombly / Iqbal standard to plaintiffs’ claims again Dwyer and Salto.B. Kampschroer v. Anoka CountyIn Kampschroer v. Anoka County —a case involving numerous claims against numerous defendants—Judge Susan Richard Nelson issued a lengthy order that ruled on over a doz..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2020
Krekelberg v. Anoka Cnty.
"...functions," such as when the person targeted is not an interested party in any law enforcement matter. Kampschroer v. Anoka Cty. , 57 F. Supp. 3d 1124, 1140-41 (D. Minn. 2014), aff'd , 840 F.3d 961 (8th Cir. 2016) ; see also McDonough , 799 F.3d at 944 n.6 ("The words of the DPPA alone are ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2015
Karasov v. Caplan Law Firm, P.A., Case No. 14–cv–1503 SRN/BRT.
"...at *2 (D.Minn. Feb. 21, 2014) ; Rasmusson v. Chisago County, 991 F.Supp.2d 1065, 1079 (D.Minn.2014) ; Kampschroer v. Anoka Cnty., 57 F.Supp.3d 1124, 1136–38, No. 13–cv–2512 (SRN/TNL), 2014 WL 5530590, at *6–7 (D.Minn. Nov. 3, 2014) ; Kost v. Hunt, 983 F.Supp.2d 1121, 1126–30 (D.Minn.2013) (..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2021
Armstrong v. City of Minneapolis
"...and belief, without more, is insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim." Kampschroer v. Anoka Cty. , 57 F. Supp. 3d 1124, 1143 (D. Minn. 2014), aff'd , 840 F.3d 961 (8th Cir. 2016) (citing Solis v. City of Fresno , No. 1:11-cv-00053, 2012 WL 868681, at *8 (E.D..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2019
Wickstrom v. City of Moose Lake
"...contact with law enforcement through their work but never as an interested party in a law enforcement matter (Kampschroer v. Anoka Cty., 57 F.Supp.3d 1124, 1134 (D. Minn. 2014), aff'd, 840 F.3d 961 (8th Cir. 2016)). A search by driver's license number, as opposed to a search by name, reason..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2021
Cole v. Doe
"...the Court will apply the Twombly / Iqbal standard to plaintiffs’ claims again Dwyer and Salto.B. Kampschroer v. Anoka CountyIn Kampschroer v. Anoka County —a case involving numerous claims against numerous defendants—Judge Susan Richard Nelson issued a lengthy order that ruled on over a doz..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex