Sign Up for Vincent AI
Keenan v. Bagley
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court upon Petitioner Thomas Michael Keenan's ("Keenan" or "Petitioner") Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Petitioner, acting pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, filed an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, challenging his conviction and sentence of death rendered by an Ohio court. (ECF No. 197.) The Respondent, Warden Margaret Bagley ("Respondent"), filed a timely Return of Writ, and Keenan filed an Amended Traverse. (ECF Nos. 218 and 223, respectively.) Respondent then filed a Sur-Reply to Amended Traverse. (ECF No. 231.)
For the following reasons, the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus will be granted in part and denied in part.I. Factual History
On October 6, 1998, a Cuyahoga County Grand Jury issued a four-count indictment against Keenan. The indictment charged Keenan with aggravated murder (prior calculation and design) with a felony murder specification in violation of Ohio Revised Code § 2903.01(A), for the murder of Anthony Klann; aggravated murder (during the commission of a felony) with a felony murder specification in violation of Ohio Revised Code § 2903.01(B); kidnapping in violation of Ohio Revised Code § 2905.01; and aggravated burglary in violation of Ohio Revised Code § 2911.11. Keenan entered a plea of not guilty to all charges.
The Ohio Supreme Court set out the following factual history, as adduced by the evidence presented at trial, upon considering Keenan's direct appeal of his convictions and sentence:
State v. Keenan, 81 Ohio St. 3d 133, 133-36, 689 N.E.2d 929, 935-37 (Ohio 1998).
Many additional facts have been adduced during the course of this proceeding, primarily through various expansions of the record. Although not summarized here, those facts will be described below to the extent relevant to the Court's analysis.I. Procedural History
This case has a long and complex history. Keenan's trial was commenced on January 23, 1989. A jury returned a verdict of guilty on all four counts on January 31, 1989. The penalty phase of the trial commenced on February 13, 1989. On February 15, 1989, the jury recommended that Keenan be sentenced to death. The trial court agreed with the jury's recommendation and sentenced Keenan to death on March 1, 1989.
Keenan filed a timely appeal of the trial court's decision to the Eighth District Court of Appeals, raising twelve assignments of error. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's decision on December 27, 1990. State v. Keenan, No. 57565, 1990 WL 212119 (Ohio App. Dec. 27, 1990). The Ohio Supreme Court reversed that decision, however, based upon prosecutorial misconduct, and remanded the case to the trial court for a new trial. State v. Keenan, 66 Ohio St. 3d 402, 613 N.E.2d 203 (Ohio 1993).
Keenan was retried on the original indictment beginning on April 21, 1994. He was represented by Russo Rocco and James Kersey. After the trial concluded on May 3, 1994, Keenan again was convicted on all counts on May 5, 1994. The penalty phase of the trial commenced on May 12, 1994, and the jury sentenced him to death on May 13, 1994. The trial court agreed with the jury's recommendation and sentenced Keenan to death that same day. He also received consecutive sentences of 15 to 25 years for the kidnapping charge and 15 to 25 years for the aggravated burglary charge.
Keenan filed a timely appeal of the trial court's decision to the Eighth District Court of Appeals, represented by Paul Mancino, raising thirty-nine assignments of error as follows:
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting