Case Law Kolbe v. Hogan

Kolbe v. Hogan

Document Cited Authorities (85) Cited in (75) Related

ARGUED:John Parker Sweeney, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Matthew John Fader, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF:T. Sky Woodward, James W. Porter, III, Marc A. Nardone, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General of Maryland, Jennifer L. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Kyle J. Bristow, Bristow Law, PLLC, Clarkston, Michigan; Jason Van Dyke, The Van Dyke Law Firm, PLLC, Plano, Texas, for Amicus Traditionalist Youth Network, LLC. Patrick Morrisey, Attorney General, Elbert Lin, Solicitor General, Julie Marie Blake, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia, Charleston, West Virginia, for Amicus State of West Virginia; Luther Strange, Attorney General of Alabama, Montgomery, Alabama, for Amicus State of Alabama; Michael C. Geraghty, Attorney General of Alaska, Juneau, Alaska, for Amicus State of Alaska; Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, for Amicus State of Arizona; Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida, for Amicus State of Florida; Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General of Idaho, Boise, Idaho, for Amicus State of Idaho; Derek Schmidt, Attorney General of Kansas, Topeka, Kansas, for Amicus State of Kansas; James D. Caldwell, Attorney General of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for Amicus State of Louisiana; Bill Schuette, Attorney General of Michigan, Lansing, Michigan, for Amicus State of Michigan; Chris Koster, Attorney General of Missouri, Jefferson City, Missouri, for Amicus State of Missouri; Timothy C. Fox, Attorney General of Montana, Helena, Montana, for Amicus State of Montana; Jon Bruning, Attorney General of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, for Amicus State of Nebraska; Gary King, Attorney General of New Mexico, Santa Fe, New Mexico, for Amicus State of New Mexico; Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General of North Dakota, Bismarck, North Dakota, for Amicus State of North Dakota; E. Scott Pruitt Attorney General of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Amicus State of Oklahoma; Alan Wilson, Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Amicus State of South Carolina; Martin J. Jackley, Attorney General of South Dakota, Pierre, South Dakota, for Amicus State of South Dakota; Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas, Austin, Texas, for Amicus State of Texas; Sean Reyes, Attorney General of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, for Amicus State of Utah; Peter K. Michael, Attorney General of Wyoming, Cheyenne, Wyoming, for Amicus State of Wyoming; Jack Conway, Attorney General of Kentucky, Frankfort, Kentucky, for Amicus Commonwealth of Kentucky. Charles J. Cooper, David H. Thompson, Peter A. Patterson, Cooper & Kirk, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Amicus National Rifle Association of America, Inc. C.D. Michel, Clinton B. Monfort, Anna M. Barvir, Michel & Associates, P.C., Long Beach, California, for Amici CRPA Foundation, Gun Owners of California, Colorado State Shooting Association, Idaho State Rifle & Pistol Association, Illinois State Rifle Association, Kansas State Rifle Association, League of Kentucky Sportsmen, Inc., Nevada Firearms Coalition, Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs, New Mexico Shooting Sports Association, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Texas State Rifle Association, Vermont Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs, and Vermont Rifle & Pistol Association. Michael Connelly, U.S. Justice Foundation, Ramona, California, for Amicus U.S. Justice Foundation; Robert J. Olson, Herbert W. Titus, William J. Olson, John S. Miles, Jeremiah L. Morgan, William J. Olson, P.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Amici Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, U.S. Justice Foundation, The Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, The Abraham Lincoln Foundation for Public Policy Research, Inc., Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Institute on the Constitution. Brian S. Koukoutchos, Mandeville, Louisiana; James B. Astrachan, Astrachan Gunst Thomas, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Amici Congress of Racial Equality, National Center for Public Policy Research, Project 21, Pink Pistols, Women Against Gun Control, and The Disabled Sportsmen of North America. Dan M. Peterson, Dan M. Peterson, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Amici The Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, Law Enforcement Action Network, Law Enforcement Alliance of America, International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association, and Western States Sheriffs' Association. Jonathan K. Baum, Chicago, Illinois, Mark T. Ciani, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, New York, New York, for Amici Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and Marylanders to Prevent Gun Violence, Inc. Jonathan E. Lowy, Kelly Sampson, Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, Washington, D.C.; Elliott Schulder, Suzan F. Charlton, Amit R. Vora, Catlin Meade, Stephen Kiehl, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Brady Center To Prevent Gun Violence. Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Anisha S. Dasgupta, Deputy Solicitor General, Claude S. Platton, Assistant Solicitor General, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, for Amicus State of New York; Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California, Sacramento, California, for Amicus State of California; George Jepsen, Attorney General of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut, for Amicus State of Connecticut; Russell A. Suzuki, Attorney General of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Amicus State of Hawaii; Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, for Amicus State of Illinois; Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa, Des Moines, Iowa, for Amicus State of Iowa; Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, for Amicus Commonwealth of Massachusetts; Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General of Oregon, Salem, Oregon, for Amicus State of Oregon; Karl A. Racine, Attorney General of The District of Columbia, Washington, D.C., for Amicus The District of Columbia.

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion for the court as to Parts I, II, III, V, and VI, in which Judge AGEE joined. Judge AGEE wrote separately as to Part IV. Judge KING wrote an opinion dissenting as to Part III and concurring in the judgment as to Parts IV and V. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote a dissenting opinion as to Part IV.

TRAXLER, Chief Judge, wrote the opinion for the court as to Parts I, II, and III, in which Judge AGEE joined.

In April 2013, Maryland passed the Firearm Safety Act ("FSA"), which, among other things, bans law-abiding citizens, with the exception of retired law enforcement officers, from possessing the vast majority of semi-automatic rifles commonly kept by several million American citizens for defending their families and homes and other lawful purposes. Plaintiffs raise a number of...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of West Virginia – 2020
Nelson v. Warner
"...well-established that the "dissimilar treatment of ... dissimilar groups does not violate the Equal Protection Clause." Kolbe v. Hogan , 813 F.3d 160, 190 (4th Cir. 2016), on reh'g en banc , 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017). The court also held the statute's tiered structure was facially neutra..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2021
Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Hogan
"...not decide, that the Firearm Safety Act places some burden on the Second Amendment right."), aff'd in part, vacated in part, 813 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2016), aff'd on reh'g en banc , 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017). As to what level of scrutiny to apply, the Fourth Circuit has instructed that whe..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts – 2018
Worma v. Healey
"...their Second Amendment rights because they were uncertain whether weapons they wished to acquire were prohibited." Kolbe v. Hogan, 813 F.3d 160, 190 (4th Cir. 2016). Despite this implication that the challenge may not have been proper, the panel continued on to the merits of the vagueness i..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2016
Hamilton v. Pallozzi
"...banned weapons and would purchase additional banned weapons but for the ban), vacated in part on other grounds sub nom. Kolbe v. Hogan , 813 F.3d 160 (4th Cir.2016).10 To prove his point, Plaintiff supplies a declaration by his former attorney, Margaret Love, as well as an e-mail chain betw..."
Document | United States Court of Criminal Appeals, Navy-Marine Corps – 2020
United States v. Begani
"...were subject to indictment or presentment in the fifth."). [66] Kolbe v. Hogan, 813 F.3d 160, 185 (4th Cir. 2016). [67] The Fourth Circuit in Kolbe cites, respectively, LaBella Winnetka, Inc. v. Village Winnetka, 628 F.3d 937, 942 (7th Cir. 2010); Grider v. City of Auburn, Ala., 618 F.3d 12..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
3 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 105-3, March 2020 – 2020
Gobbledygook: Political Questions, Manageability, & Partisan Gerrymandering
"...& Pistol Ass’n v. Cuomo, 804 F.3d 242, 256 (2d Cir. 2015)). 163 . See N.Y. State Rifle , 804 F.3d at 255. 164 . See Kolbe v. Hogan, 813 F.3d 160, 174 (4th Cir. 2016). The Fifth Circuit thus ultimately found that a machine gun would fail either the Second Circuit or Fourth Circuit test. Holl..."
Document | Vol. 73 Núm. 3, March 2021 – 2021
Second Amendment Federalism.
"...see also Ruben, supra note 11, at 83 (concluding that self-defense traditionally sanctions only a narrow range of conduct). (203.) 813 F.3d 160, 168 (4th Cir. 2016), rev'd en banc, 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017); id. at 194 (King, J., dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment). (204.)..."
Document | Núm. 36-6, August 2020
Assault on the Constitution: Why the Southern District of California Got it Right
"...only be rivaled in significance by what later became known as the "common use test" that emerged from Heller. See, e.g., Kolbe v. Hogan, 813 F.3d 160, 174 (4th Cir. 2016) (deciding that assault weapons fall into the category of "in common use at the time"). 30. See, e.g., Kolbe, 849 F.3d at..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 105-3, March 2020 – 2020
Gobbledygook: Political Questions, Manageability, & Partisan Gerrymandering
"...& Pistol Ass’n v. Cuomo, 804 F.3d 242, 256 (2d Cir. 2015)). 163 . See N.Y. State Rifle , 804 F.3d at 255. 164 . See Kolbe v. Hogan, 813 F.3d 160, 174 (4th Cir. 2016). The Fifth Circuit thus ultimately found that a machine gun would fail either the Second Circuit or Fourth Circuit test. Holl..."
Document | Vol. 73 Núm. 3, March 2021 – 2021
Second Amendment Federalism.
"...see also Ruben, supra note 11, at 83 (concluding that self-defense traditionally sanctions only a narrow range of conduct). (203.) 813 F.3d 160, 168 (4th Cir. 2016), rev'd en banc, 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017); id. at 194 (King, J., dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment). (204.)..."
Document | Núm. 36-6, August 2020
Assault on the Constitution: Why the Southern District of California Got it Right
"...only be rivaled in significance by what later became known as the "common use test" that emerged from Heller. See, e.g., Kolbe v. Hogan, 813 F.3d 160, 174 (4th Cir. 2016) (deciding that assault weapons fall into the category of "in common use at the time"). 30. See, e.g., Kolbe, 849 F.3d at..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of West Virginia – 2020
Nelson v. Warner
"...well-established that the "dissimilar treatment of ... dissimilar groups does not violate the Equal Protection Clause." Kolbe v. Hogan , 813 F.3d 160, 190 (4th Cir. 2016), on reh'g en banc , 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017). The court also held the statute's tiered structure was facially neutra..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2021
Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Hogan
"...not decide, that the Firearm Safety Act places some burden on the Second Amendment right."), aff'd in part, vacated in part, 813 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2016), aff'd on reh'g en banc , 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017). As to what level of scrutiny to apply, the Fourth Circuit has instructed that whe..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts – 2018
Worma v. Healey
"...their Second Amendment rights because they were uncertain whether weapons they wished to acquire were prohibited." Kolbe v. Hogan, 813 F.3d 160, 190 (4th Cir. 2016). Despite this implication that the challenge may not have been proper, the panel continued on to the merits of the vagueness i..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2016
Hamilton v. Pallozzi
"...banned weapons and would purchase additional banned weapons but for the ban), vacated in part on other grounds sub nom. Kolbe v. Hogan , 813 F.3d 160 (4th Cir.2016).10 To prove his point, Plaintiff supplies a declaration by his former attorney, Margaret Love, as well as an e-mail chain betw..."
Document | United States Court of Criminal Appeals, Navy-Marine Corps – 2020
United States v. Begani
"...were subject to indictment or presentment in the fifth."). [66] Kolbe v. Hogan, 813 F.3d 160, 185 (4th Cir. 2016). [67] The Fourth Circuit in Kolbe cites, respectively, LaBella Winnetka, Inc. v. Village Winnetka, 628 F.3d 937, 942 (7th Cir. 2010); Grider v. City of Auburn, Ala., 618 F.3d 12..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex