Case Law Kolbe v. Hogan

Kolbe v. Hogan

Document Cited Authorities (50) Cited in (218) Related (1)

ARGUED: John Parker Sweeney, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Matthew John Fader, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: T. Sky Woodward, James W. Porter, III, Marc A. Nardone, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS

LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, Jennifer L. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Kyle J. Bristow, BRISTOW LAW, PLLC, Clarkston, Michigan; Jason Van Dyke, THE VAN DYKE LAW FIRM, PLLC, Plano, Texas, for Amicus Traditionalist Youth Network, LLC. Patrick Morrisey, Attorney General, Elbert Lin, Solicitor General, Julie Marie Blake, Erica N. Peterson, Gilbert Dickey, Assistant Attorneys General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Amicus State of West Virginia; Luther Strange, Attorney General of Alabama, Montgomery, Alabama, for Amicus State of Alabama; Michael C. Geraghty, Attorney General of Alaska, Juneau, Alaska, for Amicus State of Alaska; Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, for Amicus State of Arizona; Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida, for Amicus State of Florida; Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General of Idaho, Boise, Idaho, for Amicus State of Idaho; Derek Schmidt, Attorney General of Kansas, Topeka, Kansas, for Amicus State of Kansas; James D. Caldwell, Attorney General of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for Amicus State of Louisiana; Bill Schuette, Attorney General of Michigan, Lansing, Michigan, for Amicus State of Michigan; Chris Koster, Attorney General of Missouri, Jefferson City, Missouri, for Amicus State of Missouri; Timothy C. Fox, Attorney General of Montana, Helena, Montana, for Amicus State of Montana; Jon Bruning, Attorney General of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, for Amicus State of Nebraska; Gary King, Attorney General of New Mexico, Santa Fe, New Mexico, for Amicus State of New Mexico; Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General of North Dakota, Bismarck, North Dakota, for Amicus State of North Dakota; E. Scott Pruitt Attorney General of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Amicus State of Oklahoma; Alan Wilson, Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Amicus State of South Carolina; Martin J. Jackley, Attorney General of South Dakota, Pierre, South Dakota, for Amicus State of South Dakota; Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas, Austin, Texas, for Amicus State of Texas; Sean Reyes, Attorney General of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, for Amicus State of Utah; Peter K. Michael, Attorney General of Wyoming, Cheyenne, Wyoming, for Amicus State of Wyoming; Jack Conway, Attorney General of Kentucky, Frankfort, Kentucky, for Amicus Commonwealth of Kentucky. Charles J. Cooper, David H. Thompson, Peter A. Patterson, John D. Ohlendorf, COOPER & KIRK, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Amicus National Rifle Association of America, Inc. C.D. Michel, Clinton B. Monfort, Anna M. Barvir, MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Long Beach, California, for Amici CRPA Foundation, Gun Owners of California, Colorado State Shooting Association, Idaho State Rifle & Pistol Association, Illinois State Rifle Association, Kansas State Rifle Association, League of Kentucky Sportsmen, Inc., Nevada Firearms Coalition, Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs, New Mexico Shooting Sports Association, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Texas State Rifle Association, Vermont Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs, and Vermont Rifle & Pistol Association. Michael Connelly, U.S. JUSTICE FOUNDATION, Ramona, California, for Amicus U.S. Justice Foundation; Robert J. Olson, Herbert W. Titus, William J. Olson, John S. Miles, Jeremiah L. Morgan, WILLIAM J. OLSON, P.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Amici Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, U.S. Justice Foundation, The Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, The Abraham Lincoln Foundation for Public Policy Research, Inc., Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Institute on the Constitution. Brian S. Koukoutchos, Mandeville, Louisiana; James B. Astrachan, ASTRACHAN GUNST THOMAS, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Amici Congress of Racial Equality, National Center for Public Policy Research, Project 21, Pink Pistols, Women Against Gun Control, and The Disabled Sportsmen of North America. Dan M. Peterson, DAN M. PETERSON, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Amici The Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, Law Enforcement Action Network, Law Enforcement Alliance of America, International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association, and Western States Sheriffs' Association. Jonathan K. Baum, Chicago, Illinois, Mark T. Ciani, KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP, New York, New York, for Amici Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and Marylanders to Prevent Gun Violence, Inc. Jonathan E. Lowy, Kelly Sampson, BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, Washington, D.C.; Elliott Schulder, Suzan F. Charlton, Amit R. Vora, Catlin Meade, Stephen Kiehl, COVINGTON & BURLING LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Brady Center To Prevent Gun Violence. Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Anisha S. Dasgupta, Deputy Solicitor General, Claude S. Platton, Assistant Solicitor General, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, for Amicus State of New York; Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California, Sacramento, California, for Amicus State of California; George Jepsen, Attorney General of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut, for Amicus State of Connecticut; Russell A. Suzuki, Attorney General of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Amicus State of Hawaii; Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, for Amicus State of Illinois; Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa, Des Moines, Iowa, for Amicus State of Iowa; Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, for Amicus Commonwealth of Massachusetts; Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General of Oregon, Salem, Oregon, for Amicus State of Oregon; Karl A. Racine, Attorney General of The District of Columbia, Washington, D.C., for Amicus The District of Columbia. J. Adam Skaggs, Mark Anthony Frasetto, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY, New York, New York; Deepak Gupta, Jonathan E. Taylor, Neil K. Sawhney, GUPTA WESSLER PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Everytown for Gun Safety.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, MOTZ, TRAXLER, KING, SHEDD, AGEE, KEENAN, WYNN, DIAZ, FLOYD, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge King wrote the opinion for the en banc majority, in which Chief Judge Gregory and Judges Wilkinson, Motz, Keenan, Wynn, Floyd, Thacker, and Harris joined in full; Judge Diaz joined in part as to the Second Amendment claims and joined as to the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection and due process claims; and Judges Niemeyer, Shedd, and Agee joined as to the Fourteenth Amendment claims only. Judge Wilkinson wrote a concurring opinion, in which Judge Wynn joined. Judge Diaz wrote an opinion...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of West Virginia – 2020
Nelson v. Warner
"...groups does not violate the Equal Protection Clause." Kolbe v. Hogan , 813 F.3d 160, 190 (4th Cir. 2016), on reh'g en banc , 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017). The court also held the statute's tiered structure was facially neutral and nondiscriminatory because all parties were "subject to the s..."
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2019
Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms Int'l, LLC
"...extend to " 'dangerous and unusual weapons' " and, therefore, that M16s and related military style rifles may be banned); Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 143 (4th Cir.) (reading Heller to mean that second amendment does not protect right to possess assault weapons featuring high capacity maga..."
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2019
Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms Int'l, LLC
"...extend to " ‘dangerous and unusual weapons’ " and, therefore, that M16s and related military style rifles may be banned); Kolbe v. Hogan , 849 F.3d 114, 143 (4th Cir.) (reading Heller to mean that second amendment does not protect right to possess assault weapons featuring high capacity mag..."
Document | Vermont Supreme Court – 2021
State v. Misch
"...is not tied to prospective military use in the context of a state militia. Its scope is accordingly limited. Cf. Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 135-36 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (concluding that weapons that are most useful in military service, as opposed to individual self-defense, fall outs..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2021
Just Puppies, Inc. v. Frosh
"...similarly situated and that the unequal treatment was the result of intentional or purposeful discrimination.’ " Kolbe v. Hogan , 849 F.3d 114, 146 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (quoting Morrison v. Garraghty , 239 F.3d 648, 654 (4th Cir. 2001) ). If that showing is made, the court " ‘proceeds ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 104-1, November 2018 – 2018
Arming Public Protests
"...state laws prohibiting open and concealed carry of certain lethal weapons). 213 . Heller , 554 U.S. at 626. 214 . See Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct 469 (2017). 215 . 720 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/24-1(a)(3) (West 2010 & Supp. 2018). 216 . Id. § 5/24-1(a)(7)...."
Document | Vol. 73 Núm. 3, March 2021 – 2021
Second Amendment Federalism.
"...that self-defense traditionally sanctions only a narrow range of conduct). (203.) 813 F.3d 160, 168 (4th Cir. 2016), rev'd en banc, 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017); id. at 194 (King, J., dissenting in part and concurring in the (204.) Id. at 169-70 (majority opinion). (205.) Id. at 172 (quotin..."
Document | Núm. 20-2, April 2022 – 2022
Inconvenient Federalism: The Pandemic, Abortion Rights, and the Commerce Clause
"...basis of both text and history, that the Second Amendment conferred an individual right to keep and bear arms.”). 221. See Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 121 (4th Cir. 2017) (upholding a Maryland ban on assault weapons); N.Y. State Rif‌le & Pistol Ass’n v. Cuomo, 804 F.3d 242, 247 (2d Cir. 2..."
Document | Núm. 36-6, August 2020
Assault on the Constitution: Why the Southern District of California Got it Right
"...& POL'Y 349, 357 (2011).39. Marzzarella, 614 F.3d at 97.40. Bunker, Calvert & Nevin, supra note 38.41. Id. at 358.42. See Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 133 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (collecting cases).43. Heller v. District of Columbia (Heller II), 670 F.3d 1244, 1269 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (Kava..."
Document | Núm. 69-5, 2020
Mass Shootings, Legislative Responses, and Public Policy: an Endless Cycle of Inaction
"...See, e.g., Wilson v. Cook Cty., 937 F.3d 1028, 1029 (7th Cir. 2019); Worman v. Healey, 922 F.3d 26, 30 (1st Cir. 2019); Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 144, 149 (4th Cir. 2017); N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Cuomo, 804 F.3d 242, 269 (2d Cir. 2015); Friedman v. City of Highland Park, 784 ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
1 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2018
Illinois General Assembly Begins to Exercise Its Exclusive Authority Over Firearms
"...Nov. 27, 2017, the Supreme Court let stand a Fourth Circuit decision upholding a State of Maryland ban on assault weapons (Kolbe v Hogan 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017)), and on Feb. 20, 2018, the Supreme Court let stand a Ninth Circuit decision that a California law requiring a 10-day waiting..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 104-1, November 2018 – 2018
Arming Public Protests
"...state laws prohibiting open and concealed carry of certain lethal weapons). 213 . Heller , 554 U.S. at 626. 214 . See Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct 469 (2017). 215 . 720 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/24-1(a)(3) (West 2010 & Supp. 2018). 216 . Id. § 5/24-1(a)(7)...."
Document | Vol. 73 Núm. 3, March 2021 – 2021
Second Amendment Federalism.
"...that self-defense traditionally sanctions only a narrow range of conduct). (203.) 813 F.3d 160, 168 (4th Cir. 2016), rev'd en banc, 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017); id. at 194 (King, J., dissenting in part and concurring in the (204.) Id. at 169-70 (majority opinion). (205.) Id. at 172 (quotin..."
Document | Núm. 20-2, April 2022 – 2022
Inconvenient Federalism: The Pandemic, Abortion Rights, and the Commerce Clause
"...basis of both text and history, that the Second Amendment conferred an individual right to keep and bear arms.”). 221. See Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 121 (4th Cir. 2017) (upholding a Maryland ban on assault weapons); N.Y. State Rif‌le & Pistol Ass’n v. Cuomo, 804 F.3d 242, 247 (2d Cir. 2..."
Document | Núm. 36-6, August 2020
Assault on the Constitution: Why the Southern District of California Got it Right
"...& POL'Y 349, 357 (2011).39. Marzzarella, 614 F.3d at 97.40. Bunker, Calvert & Nevin, supra note 38.41. Id. at 358.42. See Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 133 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (collecting cases).43. Heller v. District of Columbia (Heller II), 670 F.3d 1244, 1269 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (Kava..."
Document | Núm. 69-5, 2020
Mass Shootings, Legislative Responses, and Public Policy: an Endless Cycle of Inaction
"...See, e.g., Wilson v. Cook Cty., 937 F.3d 1028, 1029 (7th Cir. 2019); Worman v. Healey, 922 F.3d 26, 30 (1st Cir. 2019); Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 144, 149 (4th Cir. 2017); N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Cuomo, 804 F.3d 242, 269 (2d Cir. 2015); Friedman v. City of Highland Park, 784 ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of West Virginia – 2020
Nelson v. Warner
"...groups does not violate the Equal Protection Clause." Kolbe v. Hogan , 813 F.3d 160, 190 (4th Cir. 2016), on reh'g en banc , 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017). The court also held the statute's tiered structure was facially neutral and nondiscriminatory because all parties were "subject to the s..."
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2019
Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms Int'l, LLC
"...extend to " 'dangerous and unusual weapons' " and, therefore, that M16s and related military style rifles may be banned); Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 143 (4th Cir.) (reading Heller to mean that second amendment does not protect right to possess assault weapons featuring high capacity maga..."
Document | Connecticut Supreme Court – 2019
Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms Int'l, LLC
"...extend to " ‘dangerous and unusual weapons’ " and, therefore, that M16s and related military style rifles may be banned); Kolbe v. Hogan , 849 F.3d 114, 143 (4th Cir.) (reading Heller to mean that second amendment does not protect right to possess assault weapons featuring high capacity mag..."
Document | Vermont Supreme Court – 2021
State v. Misch
"...is not tied to prospective military use in the context of a state militia. Its scope is accordingly limited. Cf. Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 135-36 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (concluding that weapons that are most useful in military service, as opposed to individual self-defense, fall outs..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2021
Just Puppies, Inc. v. Frosh
"...similarly situated and that the unequal treatment was the result of intentional or purposeful discrimination.’ " Kolbe v. Hogan , 849 F.3d 114, 146 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (quoting Morrison v. Garraghty , 239 F.3d 648, 654 (4th Cir. 2001) ). If that showing is made, the court " ‘proceeds ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2018
Illinois General Assembly Begins to Exercise Its Exclusive Authority Over Firearms
"...Nov. 27, 2017, the Supreme Court let stand a Fourth Circuit decision upholding a State of Maryland ban on assault weapons (Kolbe v Hogan 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017)), and on Feb. 20, 2018, the Supreme Court let stand a Ninth Circuit decision that a California law requiring a 10-day waiting..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial