Sign Up for Vincent AI
Lay v Lay, 2019 ABCA 21
5 cases
Hannam v Medicine Hat School District No. 76,
"...2018 ABQB 515 63 Khalil v. Durant judgment granted 2018 ABQB 17 granted 2018 ABQB 473 64 Lay v. Lay dismissal granted 2017 ABQB 29 granted 2019 ABCA 21 65 Lee v. Hache dismissal granted 2018 ABQB 88 66 LNR v. Moutview Pharma Corp. dismissal denied 2017 ABQB 137 denied 2017 ABQB 730 67 Monta..."
Glamorgan Landing Estates GP Inc. v Calgary (City),
"...Wakeling & Greckol, JJ.A. (“Reference must be had to reputable dictionaries to discover the ordinary meanings of words”); Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, ¶ 63; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 254, 275, leave to appeal ref'd, [2019] S.C.C.A. No. 85 per Wakeling, J.A. (“Dictionaries compile the ordinary meanin..."
Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company,
"...meanings from which the court must select the most suitable for the context”), leave to appeal ref'd, [2017] 2 S.C.R. vii; Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, ¶ 63; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 254, 275 per Wakeling, J.A. (“Dictionaries compile the ordinary meaning of words that those who use a language correctly..."
Bruno v Samson Cree Nation, 2021 ABCA 381
"...claim can raise if it wishes to, but which the defendant is not obliged to raise if it does not wish”). [143] E.g., Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 294, leave to appeal ref’d, [2019] S.C.C.A. No. 85 (the Court upheld an order summarily dismissing the plaintiff’..."
Alexis v Alberta (Environment and Parks),
"...… [They] record a range of potential meanings from which the court must select the most suitable for the context”) & Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, ¶ 63 per Wakeling, J.A. (“Dictionaries compile the ordinary meaning of words that those who use a language correctly understand words to have”)...."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trial1 firm's commentaries
The Evolution Of The Test For Summary Judgment: Old Habits Die Hard
"...Rotzang panel, quoted the earlier cases that noted the moving party's position must be unassailable. On January 22, 2019, in Lay v Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, the majority of the Court upheld the dismissal of a plaintiff's action and did not cite either Stefanyk or Rotzang. Justice Wakeling (also on..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
Hannam v Medicine Hat School District No. 76,
"...2018 ABQB 515 63 Khalil v. Durant judgment granted 2018 ABQB 17 granted 2018 ABQB 473 64 Lay v. Lay dismissal granted 2017 ABQB 29 granted 2019 ABCA 21 65 Lee v. Hache dismissal granted 2018 ABQB 88 66 LNR v. Moutview Pharma Corp. dismissal denied 2017 ABQB 137 denied 2017 ABQB 730 67 Monta..."
Glamorgan Landing Estates GP Inc. v Calgary (City),
"...Wakeling & Greckol, JJ.A. (“Reference must be had to reputable dictionaries to discover the ordinary meanings of words”); Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, ¶ 63; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 254, 275, leave to appeal ref'd, [2019] S.C.C.A. No. 85 per Wakeling, J.A. (“Dictionaries compile the ordinary meanin..."
Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company,
"...meanings from which the court must select the most suitable for the context”), leave to appeal ref'd, [2017] 2 S.C.R. vii; Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, ¶ 63; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 254, 275 per Wakeling, J.A. (“Dictionaries compile the ordinary meaning of words that those who use a language correctly..."
Bruno v Samson Cree Nation, 2021 ABCA 381
"...claim can raise if it wishes to, but which the defendant is not obliged to raise if it does not wish”). [143] E.g., Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 294, leave to appeal ref’d, [2019] S.C.C.A. No. 85 (the Court upheld an order summarily dismissing the plaintiff’..."
Alexis v Alberta (Environment and Parks),
"...… [They] record a range of potential meanings from which the court must select the most suitable for the context”) & Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, ¶ 63 per Wakeling, J.A. (“Dictionaries compile the ordinary meaning of words that those who use a language correctly understand words to have”)...."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
1 firm's commentaries
The Evolution Of The Test For Summary Judgment: Old Habits Die Hard
"...Rotzang panel, quoted the earlier cases that noted the moving party's position must be unassailable. On January 22, 2019, in Lay v Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, the majority of the Court upheld the dismissal of a plaintiff's action and did not cite either Stefanyk or Rotzang. Justice Wakeling (also on..."