Case Law League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson

League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson

Document Cited Authorities (40) Cited in (37) Related

Peter A. Schey, Los Angeles, CA, Carlos Holguin, National Center for Immigrants Rights Inc., Los Angeles, CA, Ann Kanter, Roxana Bacon, American Immigration Lawyers Association, Sacramento, CA, Lee A. O'Connor, Jonathon P. Foerstel, Legal Aid Society of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, Morgan Rose, Legal Services Program, Eastern Valley Branch, Pomona, CA, Miguel G. Caballero, Union Privilege AFL-CIO, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs in No. CV 94-7569 MRP.

Charlton G. Holland, III, California Asst. Atty. Gen., San Francisco, CA, for California State Board of Education.

Stephen Yagman, Marion Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, for plaintiffs in No. CV 94-7570 MRP.

Bradley Stuart Phillips, Vilma S. Martinez, Eva Orlebeke Caldera, Munger, Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, CA, Howard Friedman, Los Angeles Unified School District, Office of the Legal Adviser, Los Angeles, CA, for Los Angeles United School Dist. in No. CV 94-7570 MRP.

Fred J. Kumetz, Kumetz & Glick, Los Angeles, CA, for Andrea Ayala in No. CV 94-7571 MRP.

Jon M. Ichinaga, California Asst. Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, CA, for Pete Wilson in No. CV 94-7571 MRP.

Cyrus J. Rickards, California Asst. Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA, for Daniel E. Lundgren in No. CV 94-7571 MRP.

Bruce G. Iwasaki, Alan Rader, Nancy E. Sussman, O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, CA, Vibiana Andrade, Thomas A. Saenz, Antonia Hernandez, Mexican American Legal Defense & Education Fund, Los Angeles, CA, Mark D. Rosenbaum, Silvia Argueta, Mei Lin Kwan-Gett, ACLU Foundation of So. Calif., Los Angeles, CA, for Jose T. Gregorio T., Maria R., Virginia M., Gloria P., Maria G., R.G., Karina G., Angelica G., Cal. League of United Latin American Citizens in No. CV 94-7652 MRP.

Bruce G. Iwasaki, Alan Rader, Nancy E. Sussman, Vibiana Andrade, Thomas A. Saenz, Antonia Hernandez, Stewart Kwoh, Carolyn La, Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Judy London, Central American Refugee Center, Los Angeles, CA, Mark D. Rosenbaum, Laura C. Fry, Silvia Argueta, Mei Lin Kwan-Gett, ACLU Foundation of So. Calif., William R. Tamayo, Asian Law Caucus Inc., San Francisco, CA, Karl Manheim, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, CA, Lucas Guttentag, ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project, New York City, Susan Lydon, Mark Silverman, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, San Francisco, CA, Sarah Jane Somers, San Francisco, CA, for Xiomara T. in No. CV 94-7652 MRP.

David Jonathan Becker, Loeb & Loeb, Los Angeles, CA, Vibiana Andrade, Thomas A. Saenz, Antonia Hernandez, Elisa Fernandez Cabello, Mexican American Legal Defense & Education Fund, Los Angeles, CA, Stewart Kwoh, Carolyn La, Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Mark D. Rosenbaum, Laura C. Fry, Silvia Argueta, Mei Lin Kwan-Gett, ACLU Foundation of So. Cal., Los Angeles, CA, Judy London, Michele A. Milner, Central American Resource Ctr. Legal Office, Los Angeles, CA, William R. Tamayo, Asian Law Caucus Inc., San Francisco, CA, Karl Manheim, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, CA, Lucas Guttentag, ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project, New York City, Susan Lydon, Mark Silverman, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, San Francisco, CA, Sarah Jane Somers, San Francisco, CA, Kurtiss Lee Grossman, Kurtiss L. Grossman Law Offices, Los Angeles, CA, Carmela Castellano, Stefan Rosenzweig, Public Advocates, San Francisco, CA, for Guardian Ad Litem Jesus C. in No. CV 94-7652 MRP.

Douglas E. Mirell, David Jonathan Becker, Loeb & Loeb, Los Angeles, CA, Vibiana Andrade, Thomas A. Saenz, Antonia Hernandez, Elisa Fernandez Cabello, Mexican American Legal Defense & Education Fund, Los Angeles, CA, Mark D. Rosenbaum, Silvia Argueta, Mei Lin Kwan-Gett, ACLU Foundation of So. Cal., Los Angeles, CA, Kurtiss Lee Grossman, Kurtiss L. Grossman Law Offices, Los Angeles, CA, for Guardians Ad Litem Blanca D., and Estela A., Luz D., Leonardo D., Araceli O., Maximiliano B., and David S. in No. CV 94-7652 MRP.

Charlton G. Holland, III, Jon M. Ichinaga, Donald P. Cole, California Asst. Attys. Gen., Los Angeles, CA, for Pete Wilson, Eloise Anderson in No. CV 94-7652 MRP.

Linda A. Cabatic, Cyrus J. Rickards, California Asst. Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA, for Dan Lungren in No. CV 94-7652 MRP.

Janet G. McCormick, California Department of Education, Sacramento, CA, Joyce O. Eckrem, California State Department of Education, Sacramento, CA, for Delaine Eastin in No. CV 94-7652 MRP.

James E. Holst, John F. Lundberg, David M. Birnbaum, Gary Morrison, University of California, General Counsel, Oakland, CA, for William T. Bagley, Roy T. Brophy, Clair W. Burgener, Glenn Campbell, Frank W. Clark, Jr., Ward Connerly, John Nmi Davies, Tirso Del Junco, Alice J. Gonzales, S. Sue Johnson, Meredith J. Khachigian, Leo S. Kolligian, Howard H. Leach, David S. Lee, Velma Montoya, S. Stephan Nakashima, Tom Sayles, Dean A. Watkins, Terrence Wooten, Judith Willick Levin, Ralph C. Carmona, Pete Wilson, Gray Davis, Speaker of the California Assembly, Delaine Eastin, David Flinn, Peter Preuss, Jack W. Peltason, and Jack Nmi Peltason in No. CV 94-7652 MRP.

Christine Helwick, Lee R. Rydalch, Jessica K. Frazier, California State University, Long Beach, CA, for Roland E. Arnall, Marian Bagdasarian, William D. Campbell, Ronald

L. Cedillos, Jim Considine, Jr., Martha C. Fallgatter, Bernard Goldstein, James H. Gray, William Hauck, Christopher A. Lowe, Joan Otomo-Corgel, Ralph R. Pesqueira, Ted J. Saenger, J. Gary Shansby, Michael D. Stennis, Anthony M. Vitti, Stanley T. Wang, Pete Wilson, Speaker of the California Assembly, Gray Davis, Delaine Eastin, Barry Munitz in No. CV 94-7652 MRP.

Jon M. Ichinaga, California Asst. Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, CA, John Hideki Sugiyama, California Asst. Atty. Gen., San Francisco, CA, for Larry Toy, Joe Dolphin, Alice S. Petrossian, John W. Rice, Jr., Robert A. Alleborn, Philip E. Del Campo, Yvonne Gallegos Bodle, Timothy Haidinger, Paul M. Kim, Vishwas D. More, Paul Priolo, Shirley Ralston, Wilbert L. Smith, Julia Li Wu, David Nmi Mertes in No. CV 94-7652 MRP.

MEMORANDUM OF LAW RE: REMAINING ISSUES IN CONSOLIDATED CASES

PFAELZER, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Proposition 187 is an initiative measure which was submitted to the voters of the State of California in the November 8, 1994 general election. The stated purpose of Proposition 187 is to "provide for cooperation between [the] agencies of state and local government with the federal government, and to establish a system of required notification by and between such agencies to prevent illegal aliens in the United States from receiving benefits or public services in the State of California." Prop. 187, § 1. The initiative's provisions require law enforcement, social services, health care and public education personnel to (i) verify the immigration status of persons with whom they come in contact; (ii) notify certain defined categories of persons of their immigration status; (iii) report those persons to state and federal officials; and (iv) deny those persons social services, health care and education.

A. Procedural History Prior to the Enactment of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 ("PRA")

After Proposition 187 was passed, several actions challenging the constitutionality of the initiative were commenced in state and federal courts in California. Ultimately, five actions filed in the United States District Court were consolidated in this Court for purposes of pre-trial proceedings and trial (collectively, the "consolidated actions").1,2

The plaintiffs in the consolidated actions filed suit for declaratory and injunctive relief seeking to bar California Governor Pete Wilson ("Wilson"), Attorney General Dan Lungren ("Lungren"), and other state actors3 (collectively, "defendants") from enforcing the provisions of Proposition 187.

On November 16, 1994, a temporary restraining order was granted enjoining the implementation of sections 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 of the initiative. On December 14, 1994, the Court granted plaintiffs' motions for a preliminary injunction, enjoining the implementation and enforcement of those sections.4

On May 1, 1995, the League of United Latin American Citizens ("LULAC") and Gregorio T. plaintiffs brought motions for summary judgment in which they contended that Proposition 187 is unconstitutional on the sole ground that the initiative is preempted by the federal government's exclusive constitutional authority over the regulation of immigration, Congress' exercise of that power through the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), and other federal statutes.5 Defendants opposed the LULAC and Gregorio T. motions on the grounds that Proposition 187 is not preempted and, alternatively, that if any portion of the initiative is preempted, the remaining portions are valid and must be upheld.

On November 20, 1995, the Court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment. The Court granted the motions for summary judgment with respect to the classification, notification and cooperation/reporting provisions in sections 4 through 9 of the initiative on the ground that these provisions created an impermissible state scheme to regulate immigration and were therefore...

5 cases
Document | California Court of Appeals – 2008
Martinez v. Regents of University of California
"...status to domiciled nonimmigrant aliens holding G-4 visas, violated supremacy clause]; League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson (C.D.Cal. 1997) 997 F.Supp. 1244, 1253, 1256 (LULAC II) [held that Congress in federal legislation enacted in 1996 occupied the field of regulation of pu..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia – 2004
Equal Access Educ. v. Merten
"...enacted a law allowing for their admission into public colleges and universities. 19. But see League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F.Supp. 1244, 1256 (C.D.Cal.1997) ("LULAC II") (holding that, pursuant to PRWORA and IIRIRA, Congress had evinced its intention to occupy the..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama – 2011
Cent. Ala. Fair Hous. Ctr. v. Magee
"...F.Supp.2d 1043, 1055 (S.D.Cal.2006) (Houston, J.) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F.Supp. 1244, 1253 (C.D.Cal.1997) (Pfaelzer, J.). If preemption is found, the Supremacy Clause invalidates the state or local law. Gade v. Nat'l ..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2015
In re Vargas
"...68 S.Ct. 1138, 92 L.Ed. 1478 ; Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. at 62–74, 61 S.Ct. 399, 85 L.Ed. 581 ; League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F.Supp. 1244, 1253–1254 [C.D.Cal.] ). Narrowly read, it would appear that 8 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq. expressly preempt the authority of the sta..."
Document | California Supreme Court – 2010
MARTINEZ v. The REGENTS of The Univ. of Cal.
"...Act of 1996 (PRA). (Pub.L. No. 104-193, § 411 (Aug. 22, 1996) 110 Stat. 2268; see League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson (C.D.Cal.1997) 997 F.Supp. 1244, 1249, 1251, 1253.) We conclude that section 68130.5 does not violate section 1621. As relevant here, section 1621 has two par..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
3 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 36-2, January 2022 – 2022
No parent left behind: seeking equality for parents of U.S. citizens
"...individuals suspected of being undocumented to federal immigration off‌icials.” 10. League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F. Supp. 1244, 1261 (C.D. Cal. 1997) (f‌inding that “California [was] powerless to enact its own legislative scheme to regulate immigration . . . [and] to e..."
Document | Vol. 19 Núm. 2, December 2001 – 2001
Reconsidering the use of direct democracy in making land use decisions.
"...term limit initiative); Morrissey v. State, 951 P.2d 911 (Colo. 1998) (same); League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F. Supp. 1244 (C.D. Cal. 1997) (action challenging initiative requiring denial of benefits to certain (24.) See SCHMIDT, supra note 14, at 138-39 (detailing ..."
Document | Vol. 12 Núm. 2, March 2011 – 2011
Reason over hysteria: keynote essay.
"...(24.) Bernal v. Fainter, 467 U.S. 216 (1984). (25.) Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982). (26.) Id. at 230. (27.) LULAC v. Wilson, 997 F. Supp. 1244 (C.D. Cal. (28.) Foley v. Connelie, 435 U.S. 291 (1978). (29.) Id. at 298. (30.) Id. at 300. (31.) Ambach v. Norwick, 441 U.S. 68 (1979). (32.) ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 36-2, January 2022 – 2022
No parent left behind: seeking equality for parents of U.S. citizens
"...individuals suspected of being undocumented to federal immigration off‌icials.” 10. League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F. Supp. 1244, 1261 (C.D. Cal. 1997) (f‌inding that “California [was] powerless to enact its own legislative scheme to regulate immigration . . . [and] to e..."
Document | Vol. 19 Núm. 2, December 2001 – 2001
Reconsidering the use of direct democracy in making land use decisions.
"...term limit initiative); Morrissey v. State, 951 P.2d 911 (Colo. 1998) (same); League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F. Supp. 1244 (C.D. Cal. 1997) (action challenging initiative requiring denial of benefits to certain (24.) See SCHMIDT, supra note 14, at 138-39 (detailing ..."
Document | Vol. 12 Núm. 2, March 2011 – 2011
Reason over hysteria: keynote essay.
"...(24.) Bernal v. Fainter, 467 U.S. 216 (1984). (25.) Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982). (26.) Id. at 230. (27.) LULAC v. Wilson, 997 F. Supp. 1244 (C.D. Cal. (28.) Foley v. Connelie, 435 U.S. 291 (1978). (29.) Id. at 298. (30.) Id. at 300. (31.) Ambach v. Norwick, 441 U.S. 68 (1979). (32.) ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | California Court of Appeals – 2008
Martinez v. Regents of University of California
"...status to domiciled nonimmigrant aliens holding G-4 visas, violated supremacy clause]; League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson (C.D.Cal. 1997) 997 F.Supp. 1244, 1253, 1256 (LULAC II) [held that Congress in federal legislation enacted in 1996 occupied the field of regulation of pu..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia – 2004
Equal Access Educ. v. Merten
"...enacted a law allowing for their admission into public colleges and universities. 19. But see League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F.Supp. 1244, 1256 (C.D.Cal.1997) ("LULAC II") (holding that, pursuant to PRWORA and IIRIRA, Congress had evinced its intention to occupy the..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama – 2011
Cent. Ala. Fair Hous. Ctr. v. Magee
"...F.Supp.2d 1043, 1055 (S.D.Cal.2006) (Houston, J.) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F.Supp. 1244, 1253 (C.D.Cal.1997) (Pfaelzer, J.). If preemption is found, the Supremacy Clause invalidates the state or local law. Gade v. Nat'l ..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2015
In re Vargas
"...68 S.Ct. 1138, 92 L.Ed. 1478 ; Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. at 62–74, 61 S.Ct. 399, 85 L.Ed. 581 ; League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F.Supp. 1244, 1253–1254 [C.D.Cal.] ). Narrowly read, it would appear that 8 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq. expressly preempt the authority of the sta..."
Document | California Supreme Court – 2010
MARTINEZ v. The REGENTS of The Univ. of Cal.
"...Act of 1996 (PRA). (Pub.L. No. 104-193, § 411 (Aug. 22, 1996) 110 Stat. 2268; see League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson (C.D.Cal.1997) 997 F.Supp. 1244, 1249, 1251, 1253.) We conclude that section 68130.5 does not violate section 1621. As relevant here, section 1621 has two par..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex