Sign Up for Vincent AI
Lobretto v. Sisto
DENY AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 14)
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1).
Petitioner is in custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR") serving a determinate sentence of 23 years, 8 months, pursuant to a judgment of the Superior Court of California, County of Kings (the "Superior Court"), as a result of Petitioner's 2004 convictions for (1) two counts of false imprisonment effected without violence or menace (Cal. Pen. Code § 236); (2) three counts of second degree robbery (Cal. Pen. Code § 211); (3) one count of second degree burglary (Cal. Pen. Code § 459); (4) one count of assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury (Cal. Pen. Code § 245(a)(1); and (5) one count of assault (Cal. Pen. Code § 240). (Doc. 14, pp. 2-3).
On November 30, 2004, Petitioner filed a direct appeal to the California Court of Appeals, Fifth Appellate District (the "5th DCA"), which was denied in an unpublished opinion on June 23, 2006. (Id., p. 3). Petitioner filed a Petition for Review in the California Supreme Court which was denied on October 18, 2006. (Id.).
The instant petition was filed on January 15, 2008. (Doc. 1). On February 28, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion to stay the proceedings in order to exhaust additional state court claims. (Doc. 8). On July 24, 2008, the Court granted Petitioner's motion for stay, and ordered Petitioner's counsel to file regular status reports regarding the exhaustion efforts. (Doc. 9). On January 14, 2010, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why the stay should not be lifted in light of the fact that Petitioner had failed to file any status reports. (Doc. 11). On February 8, 2010, Petitioner's counsel filed a response indicating that Petitioner would file an amended petition withdrawing the unexhausted claims. (Doc. 12). On March 5, 2010, the Court ordered the stay lifted, and directed Petitioner to file an amended petition containing only exhausted claims within thirty days. (Doc. 13). On April 2, 2010, Petitioner filed the amended petition. (Doc. 14). On April 21, 2010, the Court ordered Respondent to file a response to the amended petition. (Doc. 16). On July 15, 2010, Respondent filed the Answer and lodged the state court record with the Court. (Doc. 23). On November 1, 2010, Petitioner filed a Traverse. (Doc. 29).
Respondent concedes that all grounds for relief in the amended petition appear to have been fully exhausted. (Doc. 23, p. 7).
The Court adopts the Statement of Facts in the 5th DCA's unpublished decision:
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting