Sign Up for Vincent AI
Lockhart v. Marietta City Sch.
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter, in which the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (Doc. 11), is before the Court on Defendants William Hampton's and Marietta City School's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 34) and Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Reply (Doc. 67). For the reasons that follow, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 34) is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Reply (Doc. 67) is DENIED.
Plaintiff Melanie Lockhart is a former middle school physical education teacher for the Marietta City School District ("the District"). Plaintiff worked for the District for nearly twenty years before she was terminated in February 2019. (See Doc. 48 at 12:4-23). The events leading to her termination began roughly a year earlier, on Saturday, January 13, 2018, while she shoveled snow for her neighbor.
While shoveling snow on the morning of January 13, 2018, Plaintiff believes she lost control of her body, and a "supernatural power" lifted her and moved her roughly ten feet away. (Id., 22:1-24:14). Months later, at her deposition, she elaborated:
I was going down a tunnel and-or a well, and I said, . . . And I kept falling faster and faster. And I just said . . . I thought—that's what I thought was going to happen. And I fell through a red eye. I went through an eye and it exploded. And that's when all of a sudden the light, whiteness came to. I can't remember everything in terms of order. But the darkness and the—the—the—the bars had me to the ground. They had me pinned. And it hurt so bad. I just kept saying, And eventually I could finally move. I couldn't move. It was like one bar lifting at a time. . . .
(Id., 25:12-26:6). Plaintiff's three children eventually found her. (Id., 27:25-28:7). Plaintiff believes the "spirit of the Lord" "healed" her that morning and saved her from damnation. (Id., 30:15-31:8). The following Monday through Thursday were snow days, so Plaintiff did not return to work until Friday, January 19. (Id., 31:13-19).
Back at school, Plaintiff eagerly shared her experience with students and staff. She told her entire class about it, (id., 47:5-12), and sought out Principal Brittany Schob to share her story, (id., 50:25-51:12; Doc. 51, 25:4-21). Principal Schob later testified that Plaintiff "said that since [her experience] her pain had gone away, and the only way that she could keep her pain away was if she continued to tell people about her episode." (Doc. 51, 25:18-21). Throughout the day, Plaintiff continued to describe her experience for students and staff, keeping a group of eighth grade students late after class. (Id., 28:20-29:1). Principal Schob did not discipline or otherwise warn Plaintiff regarding her conduct at that time. (Doc. 51, 31:1-3).
Plaintiff's discussions with students extended beyond school hours. That evening and over the weekend, she exchanged emails with two students who said they were interested in learning more about Plaintiff's experience. (Id., 52:21-53:1). One student told Plaintiff that her "story really moved" her, and she "feel[s] like [she] is the person [Plaintiff] [was] talking about[.]" (Doc. 41). Plaintiff responded:
Another student wrote to Plaintiff, telling her she "sparked something in several of [her] students," and was "inspired" by Plaintiff "allowing god to use [her] to speak to others." (Doc. 42). Plaintiff wrote back:
On Monday, January 22, a concerned parent told Principal Schob that Plaintiff had a troubling conversation with her daughter regarding Plaintiff's visions. (Doc. 51, 31:16-32:24). Principal Schob cautioned Plaintiff that morning, telling her to be careful and suggesting after-school programs where she could more appropriately discuss her beliefs. (Id., 33:18-35:2). At her deposition, Principal Schob testified that, during this exchange, Plaintiff said, "she could feel what was happening inside of me, and my thoughts, and she put her hand on my hand, so she asked to hold my hand during that time so she could feel what I was feeling." (Id., 34:12-16).
Principal Schob grew more concerned. And that evening, when she attended a Marietta Board of Education ("Board") meeting, she asked the District's Superintendent, William Hampton, if they could meet. (Id., 39:5-9; see also Doc. 50 at 41:14-42:6). The two met the next morning and discussed Plaintiff's recent behavior. (Doc. 51, 39:24-40: 1). Superintendent Hampton instructed Principal Schob to keep him updated while he considered next steps. (Id., 40:13-43:5).
Principal Schob and Assistant Principal Tim Fleming then met with Plaintiff. (Id., 44:10- 12). Despite their concerns and warnings, Plaintiff told them not to worry and that the school would make "national news," a statement Principal Schob and Assistant Principal Fleming both found alarming. (Id., 44:13-22; Doc. 48, 77:13-16). Principal Schob immediately called Superintendent Hampton, who held a meeting with District administrators and Plaintiff that afternoon. (Doc. 51, 45:18-24).
At the meeting, Plaintiff appeared "excited" to share her experience and "kept repeating that she was going to make national news, that we were going to go to court," and "that we would all be there." (Id., 58:13-25). Principal Schob later testified that she was concerned about Plaintiff's "state of mind," (id., 59:20-21), and Superintendent Hampton described the meeting as "bizarre," (Doc. 50, 58:25). School administrators questioned Plaintiff about any medications ordrug use, and Plaintiff said she smoked marijuana in June 2017 and used CBD oil for pain relief. (Doc. 51, 59:24-63:7).
After meeting for roughly two hours, Superintendent Hampton placed Plaintiff on paid administrative leave. (Id., 64:2-6). He handed her an official letter to that effect, which provided in relevant part:
During this period of leave . . . You are not to communicate by any means, or through any other person, with the students of the Marietta City Schools or their parents/families regarding your employment. You must not engage in any communications with other Marietta City School District employees on matters related to your employment, this investigation, or this leave; except that, you may communicate with union representatives. If you violate this directive, it will constitute insubordination and may result in disciplinary action up to and including termination of your employment.
(Doc. 50-10).
The next day, January 24, Principal Schob and Superintendent Hampton received a call from the Washington County Sheriff's Office. (Id., 86:11-21). Apparently, a concerned citizen contacted law enforcement about one of Plaintiff's recent Facebook posts, which stated:
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting