Case Law Mass. Building Trades Council v. U.S. Dep't of Labor (In re MCP No. 165)

Mass. Building Trades Council v. U.S. Dep't of Labor (In re MCP No. 165)

Document Cited Authorities (84) Cited in (12) Related

ON EMERGENCY MOTION TO DISSOLVE STAY AND REPLY: Sarah E. Harrington, Michael S. Raab, Adam C. Jed, Brian J. Springer, Martin Totaro, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. IN RESPONSE: R. Trent McCotter, BOYDEN GRAY & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C., for Job Creators Network Petitioners. Felicia K. Watson, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner National Association of Home Builders of the United States. Christopher Wiest, CHRIS WIEST, ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC, Crestview Hills, Kentucky, for Petitioner Betten Chevrolet, Inc. Harold Craig Becker, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS, Washington, D.C., Peter J. Ford, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, Washington, D.C., Randy Rabinowitz, OSH LAW PROJECT, LLC, Washington, D.C., Andrew D. Roth, BREDHOFF & KAISER, PLLC, Washington, D.C., Nicole Berner, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, Washington, D.C., Keith R. Bolek, O'DONOGHUE & O'DONOGHUE LLP, Washington, D.C., Victoria L. Bor, SHERMAN DUNN, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner Union of American Physicians and Dentists. Cathleen A. Martin, John A. Ruth, NEWMAN, COMLEY & RUTH, P.C., Jefferson City, Missouri, for MFA Incorporated Petitioners. Benjamin M. Flowers, May Davis, OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, Christopher L. Thacker, Lindsey R. Keiser, OFFICE OF THE KENTUCKY ATTORNEY GENERAL, Frankfort, Kentucky, Clark L. Hildabrand, Brandon J. Smith, OFFICE OF THE TENNESSEE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Nashville, Tennessee, Brian Kane, Leslie M. Hayes, Megan A. Larrondo, OFFICE OF THE IDAHO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Boise, Idaho, Jeffrey A. Chanay, OFFICE OF THE KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, Topeka, Kansas, Mithun Mansinghani, OFFICE OF THE OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Lindsay S. See, OFFICE OF THE WEST VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, Edmund G. LaCour Jr., OFFICE OF THE ALABAMA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Montgomery, Alabama, Charles E. Brasington, OFFICE OF THE ALASKA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Anchorage, Alaska, Drew C. Ensign, OFFICE OF THE ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Phoenix, Arizona, D. John Sauer, OFFICE OF THE MISSOURI ATTORNEY GENERAL, Jefferson City, Missouri, David M. S. Dewhirst, Christian B. Corrigan, OFFICE OF THE MONTANA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Helena, Montana, Nicholas J. Bronni, Vincent M. Wagner, OFFICE OF THE ARKANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, Little Rock, Arkansas, Henry C. Whitaker, Jason H. Hilborn, OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Tallahassee, Florida, James A. Campbell, OFFICE OF THE NEBRASKA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lincoln, Nebraska, Anthony J. Galdieri, OFFICE OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Concord, New Hampshire, Matthew A. Sagsveen, OFFICE OF THE NORTH DAKOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Bismarck, North Dakota, Ross W. Bergethon, OFFICE OF THE GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Atlanta, Georgia, Thomas M. Fisher, OFFICE OF THE INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Indianapolis, Indiana, Thomas T. Hydrick, OFFICE OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbia, South Carolina, Samuel P. Langholz, OFFICE OF THE IOWA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Des Moines, Iowa, Elizabeth B. Murrill, OFFICE OF THE LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Judd E. Stone II, William F. Cole, Ryan S. Baasch, OFFICE OF THE TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, Austin, Texas, Melissa A. Holyoak, OFFICE OF THE UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL, Salt Lake City, Utah, John V. Coghlan, OFFICE OF THE MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL, Jackson, Mississippi, Ryan Schelhaas, OFFICE OF THE WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, Cheyenne, Wyoming, for State Petitioners. Michael E. Toner, Thomas M. Johnson, Jr., Stephen J. Obermeier, Jeremy J. Broggi, Krystal B. Swendsboe, WILEY REIN LLP, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner Republican National Committee. Daniel P. Lennington, WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for Tankcraft Petitioners. Matthew R. Miller, Robert Henneke, Chance Weldon, Nathan Curtisi, TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION, Austin, Texas, for Burnett Specialists Petitioners. John Stone Campbell III, John P. Murrill, TAYLOR, PORTER, BROOKS, & PHILLIPS L.L.P., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for Cox Operating Petitioners. Jessica Hart Steinmann, Josh Campbell, Rachel Jag, AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE, Washington, D.C., Kris W. Kobach, ALLIANCE FOR FREE CITIZENS, Lecompton, Kansas, for DTN Staffing Petitioners. Daniel R. Suhr, M. E. Buck Dougherty III, LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER, Chicago, Illinois, Sarah Harbison, PELICAN INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY, New Orleans, Louisiana, for BST Holdings Petitioners. Kurtis T. Wilder, Joseph E. Richotte, Steven R. Eatherly, BUTZEL LONG, P.C., Detroit, Michigan, for Petitioner Small Business Association of Michigan. Henry M. Perlowski, Ashley S. Kelly, ARNALL GOLDEN GREGORY LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, Richard J. Oparil, ARNALL GOLDEN GREGORY LLP, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner Natural Products Association. Robert Alt, THE BUCKEYE INSTITUTE, Columbus, Ohio, Patrick Strawbridge, CONSOVOY MCCARTHY PLLC, Boston, Massachusetts, for Petitioner Phillips Manufacturing & Tower Company. David A. Cortman, John J. Bursch, Matthew S. Bowman, Frank H. Chang, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, Washington, D.C., Ryan L. Bangert, Ryan J. Tucker, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, Scottsdale, Arizona, for Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Petitioners. Jordan A. Sekulow, Abigail A. Southerland, Miles Terry, Christy Stierhoff, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., Edward L. White III, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Petitioner Heritage Foundation. Steven P. Lehotsky, Scott A. Keller, Michael B. Schon, LEHOTSKY KELLER LLP, Washington, D.C., for Business Association Petitioners. Matthew J. Clark, ALABAMA CENTER FOR LAW AND LIBERTY, Birmingham, Alabama, for FabArc Steel Supply Petitioners. J. Larry Stine, WIMBERLY, LAWSON, STECKEL, SCHNEIDER & STINE, P.C., Atlanta, Georgia, for Associated Builders and Contractors Petitioners. Jeffrey C. Mateer, Hiram S. Sasser III, David J. Hacker, Jeremiah G. Dys, Lea E. Patterson, Keisha T. Russell, FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, Plano, Texas, for Answers in Genesis Petitioners. David A. Cortman, John J. Bursch, Matthew S. Bowman, Frank H. Chang, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, Washington, D.C., Ryan L. Bangert, Ryan J. Tucker, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, Scottsdale, Arizona, Harmeet K. Dhillon, Ronald D. Coleman, Mark P. Meuser, Michael A. Columbo, DHILLON LAW GROUP INC., San Francisco, California, for Petitioner Bentkey Services. Aaron Abadi, New York, New York, pro se. ON AMICUS BRIEF: Brianne Gorod, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER, Washington, D.C., Scott E. Rosenow WMC LITIGATION CENTER, Madison, Wisconsin, Catherine L. Strauss, ICE MILLER LLP, Columbus, Ohio, Sheng Li, NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE, Washington, D.C., Emmy L. Levens, COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC, Washington, D.C., Rachel L. Fried, Jessica Anne Morton, Jeffrey B. Dubner, JoAnn Kintz, DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION, Washington, D.C., Scott L. Nelson, Allison M. Zieve, PUBLIC CITIZEN LITIGATION GROUP, Washington, D.C., Michael T. Anderson, Adam C. Breihan, MURPHY ANDERSON PLLC, Washington, D.C., Deepak Gupta, GUPTA WESSLER PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae.

Before: GIBBONS, STRANCH, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges.

STRANCH, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which GIBBONS, J., joined. GIBBONS, J. (pg. ––––), delivered a separate concurring opinion. LARSEN, J. (pp. 39–––– – ––––57), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge

The COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked havoc across America, leading to the loss of over 800,000 lives, shutting down workplaces and jobs across the country, and threatening our economy. Throughout, American employees have been trying to survive financially and hoping to find a way to return to their jobs. Despite access to vaccines and...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Arizona – 2022
Brnovich v. Biden
"...at some level, and in some circumstances, can require citizens to obtain vaccines. It can."); In re MCP , No. 165, 21 F.4th 357, 389 (6th Cir. 2021) (Larsen, J., dissenting) ("[Q]uestions of health science and policy lie beyond the judicial ken.... But this case asks a legal question: wheth..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of Louisiana – 2022
Louisiana v. Becerra
"... ... Atty Generals Office, Josiah Kollmeyer, LA Dept. of Justice, Baton Rouge, LA, Joseph Scott St ... Justice, Washington, DC, for Xavier Becerra, US Dept of Health & Human Services, Administration ... In re MCP NO. 165 , No. 21-4027, 21 F.4th 357 (6th Cir. 2021). In ... on this exception are "indeed rare." Council of S. Mountains, Inc. v. Donovan , 653 F.2d 573 ... case," the Court upheld the Secretary of Labor postponing the implementation of Mine Safety and ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of Oklahoma – 2021
Oklahoma v. Biden
"...substantially for the reasons recently stated by the Sixth Circuit, in consolidated appellate proceedings in In re: MCP No. 165, 21 F.4th 357, 371-72 (6th Cir. Dec. 17, 2021). The case for application of the major questions doctrine to the military vaccine mandate–as applied to the Guard or..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas – 2021
Texas v. Becerra
"...the rules at issue were not "an enormous and transformative expansion in [the agencies'] regulatory authority." See In re MCP No. 165 , 21 F.4th 357, 372 (6th Cir. 2021) (order dissolving the Fifth Circuit's stay of the OSHA ETS mandate) (quoting Utility Air , 573 U.S. at 324, 134 S.Ct. 242..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit – 2022
Oakbrook Land Holdings, LLC v. Comm'r
"... ... Reg. § 1.170A-14(g)(6)(ii) This leaves us to examine the validity of Treas. Reg. § ... v. Nat. Res. Defense Council, Inc. , 435 U.S. 519, 551, 98 S.Ct. 1197, 55 ... Mfrs. Ass'n v. U.S. Dept. of Energy , 654 F.3d 496, 513 (4th Cir. 2011) ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
4 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 20-2, April 2022 – 2022
Litigation by Ambush: The Struggle to Obtain Fair Notice of OSHA Allegations
"...both to employers and affected employees as soon as possible. 14. 29 U.S.C. § 652(8). 15. 29 U.S.C. § 655(c)(1)(B). 16. In re MCP No. 165, 21 F.4th 357, 380 (6th Cir. 2021) (“To issue an ETS [emergency temporary standard], OSHA is also required to show that the ETS is ‘necessary to protect ..."
Document | Núm. 111-3, March 2023 – 2023
Americana Administrative Law
"...requirement in the Sixth Circuit, which dissolved another court’s stay of the requirement. See id. at 664 (citing In re MCP No. 165, 21 F.4th 357 (6th Cir. 2021)). The Supreme Court granted emergency relief and stayed the requirement’s enforcement. See id. at 662. The Court’s per curiam opi..."
Document | Vol. 34 Núm. 2, June 2023 – 2023
IS THE SKY REALLY FALLING?: MYRIAD AND ITS IMPACT ON THERAPEUTIC DEVELOPMENT.
"...Inc., 952 F.3d 1367 (Fed Cir. 2020); Barton v. Pret A Manger (USA) Ltd., 535 F. Supp. 3d 225, 229 (S.D.N.Y 2021); In re MCP No. 165, 21 F.4th 357, 384 (6th Cir. 2021); Collins v. Quincy Bioscience, LLC, No. 19-CV-22864-COOKE/GOODMAN, 2020 WL 3268340, at *7-21 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 19, 2020); In r..."
Document | Vol. 87 Núm. 4, September 2022 – 2022
OSHA and Public Health in an Emergency and a Culture War.
"...(implementing safety standards for prevention of transmission of bloodborne pathogens, promulgated in 1991). (25) In re MCP NO. 165, 21 F.4th 357, 370-71 (6th Cir. 2021) (describing Congressional actions to regulate transmission of bloodborne pathogens such as hepatitis (26) Nov. 2021 ETS, ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 20-2, April 2022 – 2022
Litigation by Ambush: The Struggle to Obtain Fair Notice of OSHA Allegations
"...both to employers and affected employees as soon as possible. 14. 29 U.S.C. § 652(8). 15. 29 U.S.C. § 655(c)(1)(B). 16. In re MCP No. 165, 21 F.4th 357, 380 (6th Cir. 2021) (“To issue an ETS [emergency temporary standard], OSHA is also required to show that the ETS is ‘necessary to protect ..."
Document | Núm. 111-3, March 2023 – 2023
Americana Administrative Law
"...requirement in the Sixth Circuit, which dissolved another court’s stay of the requirement. See id. at 664 (citing In re MCP No. 165, 21 F.4th 357 (6th Cir. 2021)). The Supreme Court granted emergency relief and stayed the requirement’s enforcement. See id. at 662. The Court’s per curiam opi..."
Document | Vol. 34 Núm. 2, June 2023 – 2023
IS THE SKY REALLY FALLING?: MYRIAD AND ITS IMPACT ON THERAPEUTIC DEVELOPMENT.
"...Inc., 952 F.3d 1367 (Fed Cir. 2020); Barton v. Pret A Manger (USA) Ltd., 535 F. Supp. 3d 225, 229 (S.D.N.Y 2021); In re MCP No. 165, 21 F.4th 357, 384 (6th Cir. 2021); Collins v. Quincy Bioscience, LLC, No. 19-CV-22864-COOKE/GOODMAN, 2020 WL 3268340, at *7-21 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 19, 2020); In r..."
Document | Vol. 87 Núm. 4, September 2022 – 2022
OSHA and Public Health in an Emergency and a Culture War.
"...(implementing safety standards for prevention of transmission of bloodborne pathogens, promulgated in 1991). (25) In re MCP NO. 165, 21 F.4th 357, 370-71 (6th Cir. 2021) (describing Congressional actions to regulate transmission of bloodborne pathogens such as hepatitis (26) Nov. 2021 ETS, ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Arizona – 2022
Brnovich v. Biden
"...at some level, and in some circumstances, can require citizens to obtain vaccines. It can."); In re MCP , No. 165, 21 F.4th 357, 389 (6th Cir. 2021) (Larsen, J., dissenting) ("[Q]uestions of health science and policy lie beyond the judicial ken.... But this case asks a legal question: wheth..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of Louisiana – 2022
Louisiana v. Becerra
"... ... Atty Generals Office, Josiah Kollmeyer, LA Dept. of Justice, Baton Rouge, LA, Joseph Scott St ... Justice, Washington, DC, for Xavier Becerra, US Dept of Health & Human Services, Administration ... In re MCP NO. 165 , No. 21-4027, 21 F.4th 357 (6th Cir. 2021). In ... on this exception are "indeed rare." Council of S. Mountains, Inc. v. Donovan , 653 F.2d 573 ... case," the Court upheld the Secretary of Labor postponing the implementation of Mine Safety and ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of Oklahoma – 2021
Oklahoma v. Biden
"...substantially for the reasons recently stated by the Sixth Circuit, in consolidated appellate proceedings in In re: MCP No. 165, 21 F.4th 357, 371-72 (6th Cir. Dec. 17, 2021). The case for application of the major questions doctrine to the military vaccine mandate–as applied to the Guard or..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas – 2021
Texas v. Becerra
"...the rules at issue were not "an enormous and transformative expansion in [the agencies'] regulatory authority." See In re MCP No. 165 , 21 F.4th 357, 372 (6th Cir. 2021) (order dissolving the Fifth Circuit's stay of the OSHA ETS mandate) (quoting Utility Air , 573 U.S. at 324, 134 S.Ct. 242..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit – 2022
Oakbrook Land Holdings, LLC v. Comm'r
"... ... Reg. § 1.170A-14(g)(6)(ii) This leaves us to examine the validity of Treas. Reg. § ... v. Nat. Res. Defense Council, Inc. , 435 U.S. 519, 551, 98 S.Ct. 1197, 55 ... Mfrs. Ass'n v. U.S. Dept. of Energy , 654 F.3d 496, 513 (4th Cir. 2011) ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex