Sign Up for Vincent AI
Mazza v. Mazza
Neil R. Marcus and Alexander Copp, Danbury, in support of the petition.
Kathy Boufford, Newtown, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 216 Conn. App. 285, 285 A.3d 90 (2022), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court incorrectly conclude that the trial court had properly determined that the parties’ separation agreement, which provided that ‘the plaintiff [would] receive 50 [percent] of all awards from [the] defendant's workers’ compensation suit,’ clearly and unambiguously included that portion of such awards...
2 cases
Lafferty v. Jones
"...it did." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Mazza v. Mazza, 216 Conn. App. 285, 297–98, 285 A.3d 86790 (2022), cert. granted, 346 Conn. 904, 287 A.3d 600 (2023). [10] The defendant does not challenge the court’s findings that its orders requiring him to attend the March 23 and 24, 2022 dep..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
2 cases
Lafferty v. Jones
"...it did." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Mazza v. Mazza, 216 Conn. App. 285, 297–98, 285 A.3d 86790 (2022), cert. granted, 346 Conn. 904, 287 A.3d 600 (2023). [10] The defendant does not challenge the court’s findings that its orders requiring him to attend the March 23 and 24, 2022 dep..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting