Sign Up for Vincent AI
McCombs v. Ohio Dep't of Developmental Disabilities
On brief: Bordas & Bordas, PLLC, Geoffrey C. Brown, and Tyler J. Smith, for appellant McCombs. Argued: Geoffrey C. Brown.
On brief: Dave Yost, Attorney General, Eric A. Walker, and Amy S. Brown, Columbus, for appellee Ohio Department of Developmental Disabilities. Argued: Eric A. Walker, Columbus.
DECISION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee, Jerri L. McCombs, individually and as guardian of her adult son B.C., appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio that found defendant-appellee/cross-appellant, State of Ohio, through its Department of Developmental Disabilities ("ODDD"), vicariously liable for the actions of its employees in abusing and neglecting B.C. when he was a resident at the Cambridge Developmental Center ("CDC") and awarding $16,100 in damages. ODDD filed a notice of cross-appeal. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the Court of Claims and remand the matter to that court.
{¶ 2} B.C. is a 25-year-old man with diagnoses of autism, seizure disorder, intellectual disability, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, and aphasia. He underwent a craniotomy and cranioplasty in the past few years due to a traumatic brain injury. B.C. functions in the moderate to severe range of intellectual disability and is non-verbal. (See CDC Psychological Evaluation conducted by Melissa M. Harger, Ph.D., Psychologist, CDC Physical Examination conducted by Dr. Chendraj, M.D., Physician, CDC Special Team Report and CDC Investigative Service Unit Reports of Investigation at Pltf.’s Ex. 31 at 235, 237 and 253, and Pltf.’s Exs. 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 16 respectively.) B.C. has limited speech, "but communicates best through picture form and through body language and facial expressions." A CDC document titled "my individual plan," under a section titled "[h]ow I communicate and how I want you to communicate with me," indicates "[B.C.] rarely speaks and instead uses simple signs, facial expressions, gestures, body language, and sometimes aggressive behaviors such as pulling and grabbing to let others know what he wants and needs." (Pltf.’s Ex. 31 at 255.)
{¶ 3} On March 2, 2018, shortly before his 25th birthday, B.C. was admitted to CDC for stabilization of some of his behaviors. CDC's mission is "[t]o provide rehabilitation services to the people that live here and ensure compliance with standards." (Tr. Vol. II at 364.) CDC is a habitation center that includes four cottages, each with two sides, A and B. Each cottage has administrative offices in the hallway between the two sides. Approximately 70 residents are housed in the cottages. B.C. was housed in Steele Cottage, side A, with 11 other residents.
{¶ 4} CDC developed a person-centered plan for B.C., which is a tool that is a summary of the comprehensive functional assessments from the interdisciplinary team. The psychologist developed a behavioral-support strategy for B.C. to address target behaviors. B.C.’s target behaviors included physical aggression, self-injurious behavior, taking property, especially food and beverages, ritualistic tendencies, including cleaning, and other inappropriate behaviors. The day-to-day care was provided by therapeutic program workers ("TPWs") who were trained to use positive supports and principles. The CDC Superintendent, Cathleen Ballinger, testified that "the slapping and * * * kicking and choking" of a resident constitutes abuse and was "strictly forbidden [at] CDC" and were not approved ways to control residents’ behavior. (Tr. Vol. II at 437-38.) Any use of physical restraint was only permissible in a situation involving an imminent risk of harm.
{¶ 5} On behalf of B.C., appellant, as his mother and guardian, signed a document titled "client rights and individual complaint procedure," which stated, among other rights, the right to "[h]ave a clean safe place to live in." (Emphasis added.) (Pltf.’s Ex. 31 at 238.)
{¶ 6} On June 26, 2018, another CDC resident reported to a supervisor that TPW Dianna Stein had hit B.C., pulled his ear, and attempted to drag him. B.C. was examined by a nurse on June 26, 2018, but she did not find any visible injuries. Douglas Bachmann, an investigator at CDC investigated the claim. Bachmann watched the videotapes from surveillance cameras in the common areas as part of his investigation and determined that Stein had committed multiple acts of abuse on B.C. However, the videotape recorded over itself after 30 days, thus he could only investigate the prior 30 days. In the prior 30 days, however, Bachmann identified several acts of abuse and other TPWs who failed to report that abuse.
{¶ 7} The videotapes and Bachmann's reports demonstrated the following incidents:
{¶ 8} McCombs removed B.C. from CDC in September 2018.1 B.C. currently lives in an apartment and has one of two independent care providers with him at all times, one of whom is McCombs. McCombs left her job as a hospital administrator earning approximately $89,000 per year plus bonuses to become a certified independent care provider to provide for B.C. She currently works a full-time job at a nearby hospital and then works from 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. every weekday and all weekend as an independent care provider for B.C. A second independent care provider works from 6:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. every weekday.
{¶ 9} As a result of the investigation, TPWs Frattali and Jasielum received five-day suspensions. TPWs Stein, Kuczmarski,...
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting