Case Law McDonough v. Anoka Cnty.

McDonough v. Anoka Cnty.

Document Cited Authorities (48) Cited in (348) Related

Johanna Beth McDonough, Brooke Bass, Dawn Mitchell, and Brian Potocnik was Lorenz F. Fett, Jr., and Sonia Miller–Van Oort, argued, Jonathan A. Strauss, Kenneth Hiroyasu Fukuda, on the brief, Minneapolis, MN, for appellants.

Ramona Dohman and Michael Campion was Oliver J. Larson, AAG, argued, Saint Paul, MN, of appellees.

Jon K. Iverson, argued, Bloomington, MN, of city appellees.

Susan Marie Tindal, Bloomington, MN, Stephanie A. Angolkar, of Bloomington, MN, on the brief, for the City of Apple Valley, City of Big Lake, City of Biwabik, City of Bloomington, City of Brooklyn Center, City of Brooklyn Park, City of Cambridge, City of Deephaven, City of Dilworth, City of Eagan, City of Elk River, City of Farmington, City of Gilbert, City of Golden Valley, City of Hancock, City of Hoyt Lakes, City of Lake City, City of Lakeville, City of Moorhead, City of New Hope, City of New Ulm, City of Redwood Falls, City of Rosemount, City of Virginia and City of Wells.

Cheri M. Sisk, of St. Paul, MN, on the brief, for the City of St. Paul.

Gregory P. Sautter, Minneapolis, MN, on the brief, the City of Minneapolis.

Mark P. Hodkinson, Christopher J. Haugen, Minneapolis, MN, on the brief, the City of Edina.

Susan Marie Tindal, Stephanie A. Angolkar, Bloomington, MN, on the brief, for the City of Aitkin, City of Anoka, City of Arlington, City of Blaine, City of Bloomington, City of Blue Earth, City of Brooklyn Park, City of Cannon Falls, City of Champlin, City of Cottage Grove, City of Crosby, City of Crosslake, City of Green Isle, City of Hopkins, City of Lake Shore, City of Lakeville, City of Maple Grove, City of Maplewood, City of Marshall, City of Minnetonka, City of Northfield, City of Plymouth, City of Red Wing, City of Rosemount, City of Roseville, City of St. Francis, City of Wabasha, City of White Bear Lake and City of Woodbury.

Joseph E. Flynn, argued, Lake Elmo, MN, of county appellees.

Jamie L. Guderian of Lake Elmo, MN, on the brief, for Aitkin County, Beltrami County, Carver County, Chisago County, Cook County, County of McLeod, Freeborn County, Kandiyohi County, Mower County, Rice County, Sherburne County, Stearns County, Steele County and Wright County.

Toni Ann Beitz, Beth Ann Stack, Daniel Kaczor, Minneapolis, MN, on the brief of Hennepin County.

Amelia Jadoo, Hastings, MN, on the brief of Dakota County.

Nick Campanario, Duluth, MN, on the brief of St. Louis County.

Bryan Frantz, Anoka, MN, on the brief of Anoka County.

Kimberly Parker, Robert B. Roche, Saint Paul, MN, on the brief of Ramsey County.

Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

In this consolidated appeal, Brooke Nicole Bass, Johanna Beth McDonough, Dawn Mitchell, and Brian Potocnik (collectively, Drivers) challenge the dismissal of their separate actions against numerous cities, counties, and other government entities, known and unknown (collectively, Local Entities); numerous unknown law enforcement or other government personnel and supervisors, officers, deputies, staff,...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Nebraska – 2020
Doe v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Neb.
"...cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements,’ or legal conclusions couched as factual allegations." McDonough v. Anoka County , 799 F.3d 931, 945 (8th Cir. 2015) (alteration in original) (quoting Iqbal , 556 U.S. at 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937 )."Judgment on the pleadings ‘should be gr..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2017
Greenley v. Laborers' Int'l Union of N. Am.
"...may be circumstantial and need only be enough to nudge the claim across the line from conceivable to plausible." McDonough v. Anoka Cty. , 799 F.3d 931, 945 (8th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). LIUNA's argument suggests that, to withstand a motion to dismiss, Greenley was req..."
Document | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Minnesota – 2016
Stoebner v. Opportunity Fin., LLC (In re Polaroid Corp.), JOINTLY ADMINISTERED UNDER CASE NO. 08-46617
"...all factual allegations in the complaint and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, ...McDonough v. Anoka County, 799 F.3d 931, 945 (8th Cir.2015) (citing Richter v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 686 F.3d 847, 850 (8th Cir.2012) (per curiam)). As before, in determining ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Nebraska – 2016
McChesney v. Peterson
"...complaint's factual allegations must be "sufficient to ‘raise a right to relief above the speculative level.’ " McDonough v. Anoka Cty. , 799 F.3d 931, 946 (8th Cir. 2015) (quoting Twombly , 550 U.S. at 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955 ). The Court must accept factual allegations as true, but it is not ..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit – 2017
In re Pre-Filled Propane Tank Antitrust Litig.
"...U.S. at 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955. Also reviewed de novo is whether a claim is barred by the statute of limitations. McDonough v. Anoka Cnty. , 799 F.3d 931, 939-40 (8th Cir. 2015). "A court may dismiss a complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) as barred by a statute of limitatio..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Nebraska – 2020
Doe v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Neb.
"...cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements,’ or legal conclusions couched as factual allegations." McDonough v. Anoka County , 799 F.3d 931, 945 (8th Cir. 2015) (alteration in original) (quoting Iqbal , 556 U.S. at 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937 )."Judgment on the pleadings ‘should be gr..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2017
Greenley v. Laborers' Int'l Union of N. Am.
"...may be circumstantial and need only be enough to nudge the claim across the line from conceivable to plausible." McDonough v. Anoka Cty. , 799 F.3d 931, 945 (8th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). LIUNA's argument suggests that, to withstand a motion to dismiss, Greenley was req..."
Document | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Minnesota – 2016
Stoebner v. Opportunity Fin., LLC (In re Polaroid Corp.), JOINTLY ADMINISTERED UNDER CASE NO. 08-46617
"...all factual allegations in the complaint and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, ...McDonough v. Anoka County, 799 F.3d 931, 945 (8th Cir.2015) (citing Richter v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 686 F.3d 847, 850 (8th Cir.2012) (per curiam)). As before, in determining ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Nebraska – 2016
McChesney v. Peterson
"...complaint's factual allegations must be "sufficient to ‘raise a right to relief above the speculative level.’ " McDonough v. Anoka Cty. , 799 F.3d 931, 946 (8th Cir. 2015) (quoting Twombly , 550 U.S. at 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955 ). The Court must accept factual allegations as true, but it is not ..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit – 2017
In re Pre-Filled Propane Tank Antitrust Litig.
"...U.S. at 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955. Also reviewed de novo is whether a claim is barred by the statute of limitations. McDonough v. Anoka Cnty. , 799 F.3d 931, 939-40 (8th Cir. 2015). "A court may dismiss a complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) as barred by a statute of limitatio..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex