Case Law McGarry v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners for the Cnty. of Lincoln

McGarry v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners for the Cnty. of Lincoln

Document Cited Authorities (119) Cited in (25) Related

S. Doug Jones Witt, The Jones Witt Law Firm, Roswell, New Mexico, Attorney for the Plaintiff

Damian L. Martinez, Holt Mynatt Martinez P.C., Las Cruces, New Mexico, Attorneys for the Defendants

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

James O. Browning, United District Court Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion and Supporting Memorandum for Qualified Immunity and Summary Judgment, filed March 15, 2017 (Doc. 45)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on November 6, 2017. The primary issues are (i) whether Defendants Mike Wood, Jason Green, and David Hightower (collectively "Officers") are entitled to qualified immunity on Plaintiff Sean McGarry's claim that Wood used excessive force when he shoved McGarry against his kitchen counter to arrest him; (ii) whether the Officers maliciously prosecuted McGarry for resisting, evading, or obstructing a peace officer and for assaulting a peace officer; (iii) whether the Court should dismiss the respondeat superior count against Defendants Board of County Commissioners for the County of Lincoln and the Lincoln County Sheriff's Department; and (iv) whether the Court should dismiss the remaining state law claims. The Court concludes that: (i) Wood used excessive force, but he is entitled to qualified immunity, because the right was not clearly established; (ii) the Officers are entitled to qualified immunity on the malicious prosecution count, because the right was not clearly established; (iii) Lincoln County and Lincoln County's Sheriff's Department cannot be liable under respondeat superior for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims; and (iv) the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over McGarry's remaining state law claim, so dismisses it. Accordingly, the Court grants the Motion for all federal claims and dismisses the state law claim without prejudice.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The Court draws its facts from the Defendants' statement of undisputed material facts. See Motion at 3–5. See also Plaintiff's Response and Supporting Memorandum to Defendant's Motion for Qualified Immunity and Summary Judgment at 1–3, filed April 24, 2017 (Doc. 52)("Response").1

On May 26, 2014, Officers Wood, Green, and Hightower responded to a report that McGarry and his girlfriend—Theresa Traci—got into a fight at McGarry's rural New Mexico home. See Motion ¶ 1, at 3 (asserting this fact)(citing Affidavit of Deputy Mike Wood ¶ 3, at 1 (executed March 14, 2017), filed March 15, 2017, (Doc. 45–1)("Wood Aff."); Lapel Video of Deputy Mike Wood at 0:00:00–0:20:47, (dated May 26, 2014), filed March 15, 2017 (Doc. 45–1)(Attachment 1)("Wood Video 1"). McGarry is a suspended police officer whom the Capitan New Mexico Police Department employed. See Motion ¶ 5, at 3 (asserting this fact)(citing Wood Aff. ¶ 7, at 1; Wood Video 1 at 0:05:03–11, 0:13:12–0:14:42).

When the Officers arrived at McGarry's home, Wood approached Traci, who was outside of the residence, while Green and Hightower ventured into the home to speak with McGarry. See Motion ¶¶ 2–3, at 3 (asserting this fact)(citing Wood Aff. ¶¶ 3–5, at 1; Wood Video 1 at 0:00:00–0:20:47). Traci told Wood that McGarry had choked her the previous night and that she had returned to McGarry's home to retrieve her belongings and her pet lizard. See Motion ¶¶ 4, 6, at 3 (asserting this fact)(citing Wood Aff. ¶¶ 6, 8, at 1–2; Wood Video 1 at 0:00:25–0:02:18, 0:03:20–45; Lapel Video of Deputy Mike Wood at 0:01:40–0:10:40, (dated May 26, 2014), filed March 15, 2017 (Doc. 45–1)(Attachment 2)("Wood Video 2") ). Traci also told Wood that she was afraid of McGarry. See Motion ¶ 6, at 3 (citing Wood Aff. ¶ 8, at 2; Wood Video 1 at 0:00:25–0:02:18, 0:03:20–45; Wood Video 2 at 0:01:40–0:10:40) ).

Approximately thirty minutes after the Officers arrived at the home, and while Wood was helping Traci work through some paperwork, McGarry exited his house while talking on the phone and told the person with whom he was speaking that Traci was lying and "playing the female card." Motion ¶ 8, at 4 (asserting this fact)(citing Wood Aff. ¶ 9, at 2; Wood Video 2 at 0:10:37–43). Wood, seeing that McGarry's conversation upset Traci, ordered McGarry to go back inside or face arrest. See Motion ¶ 9, at 4 (asserting this fact)(citing Wood Aff. ¶ 10, at 2; Wood Video 2 at 0:10:44–0:11:15). McGarry became agitated, but retreated into his home. See Motion ¶ 10, at 4 (asserting this fact)(citing Wood Aff. ¶ 11, at 2; Wood Video 2 at 0:10:44–0:11:15).

Green followed McGarry into the house and pleaded with McGarry, who was yelling,2 to be calm. See Lapel Video of Deputy Jason Green at 35:20–43, (dated May 26, 2014), filed March 15, 2017 (Doc. 45–1)(Attachment 3)("Green Video"); Response at 1–3 (not disputing this fact).3 McGarry continued to yell and moved to enter another room, upon which Green said to him, "I can't have you walk in there. You've already advised me you have a gun in the house."4 Green Video at 35:44–47 (Green). See Motion at 3–5 (not disputing this fact). In response, McGarry yelled at Green: "You want the fucking gun?" Green Video at 35:47–48 (McGarry). See Motion at 3–5 (not disputing this fact); Response at 1–3 (not disputing this fact). McGarry moved to the kitchen, picked up a box underneath the kitchen counter and shouted: "It's right here.... It's in the fucking box, and you're pointing a gun at me.... Get the fuck out of my house!" Green Video at 35:49–36:04 (McGarry). See Motion at 3–5 (not disputing this fact); Response at 1–3 (not disputing this fact).5 During this exchange, Green had drawn his duty firearm, but holstered it seconds after seeing the box. See Green Video at 35:49–36:04; Lapel Video of Deputy David Hightower at 0:048:08–15, (dated May 26, 2014), filed March 15, 2017 (Doc. 45–1)(Attachment 4)("Hightower Video") ). See Motion at 3–5 (not disputing this fact); Response 1–3 (not disputing this fact). As McGarry yelled at Green to leave his house, McGarry alternated between pointing his finger at Green and at the door. See Green Video at 35:54–36:15.

Wood, who was still outside the home, heard screaming, so he ran inside See Motion ¶ 12, at 4 (asserting this fact)(citing Wood Aff. ¶ 13, at 2; Wood Video 2 at 0:11:40–53). Wood was afraid that Green and Hightower were in danger, because he knew McGarry had a gun. See Motion ¶ 12, at 4 (asserting this fact)(citing Wood Aff. ¶ 13, at 2; Wood Video 2 at 0:11:40–53). Wood had been told, however, that the gun was old and that there was no ammunition for it. See Wood Video at 13:10–21 (Traci). As Wood entered the kitchen, he saw McGarry standing a few feet from Green yelling and shaking his finger. See Motion ¶ 13, at 4 (citing Wood Aff. ¶ 14, at 2; Wood Video 2 at 0:11:53–0:13:19; Green Video at 0:35:57–0:37:25; Hightower Video at 0:048:20–0:50:00). Believing that McGarry was about to hit Green, Wood grabbed McGarry from behind in a bear hug, pushed McGarry against the kitchen counter, and, later, forced him to the ground. See Motion ¶ 15, at 4–5 (asserting this fact)(citing Wood Aff. ¶ 16, at 2; Wood Video 2 at 0:11:53–0:13:19; Green Video at 0:35:57–0:37:25; Hightower Video at 0:48:20–0:50:00); Response at 3 (not disputing this fact). When McGarry stopped struggling, Wood then handcuffed him. See Motion ¶ 15, at 4–5 (asserting this fact)(citing Wood Aff. ¶ 16, at 2; Wood Video 2 at 0:11:53–0:13:19; Green Video at 0:35:57–0:37:25; Hightower Video at 0:48:20–0:50:00); Response at 3 (not disputing this fact).

After arresting McGarry, Wood filed a Criminal Complaint against McGarry for assaulting a peace officer and resisting, evading, or obstructing an officer. See Criminal Complaint at 1, filed March 15, 2017 (Doc. 45–1)("Criminal Complaint"). On November 16, 2015, a jury acquitted McGarry on both counts. See Response at 3.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

McGarry subsequently filed a Complaint for Civil Rights Violations, filed May 26, 2016, (Doc. 1)("Complaint"), which alleges an excessive force claim against Wood, a malicious prosecution claim against the Officers, a respondeat superior claim against Lincoln County and the Lincoln County Sheriff's Department for the Officers' acts, and a New Mexico Tort Claims Act ("NMTCA"), N.M. Stat. Ann. § 41–4–1 to 30, claim against the Officers. See Complaint ¶¶ 43–72, at 5–8.

1. The Motion.

On March 15, 2017, the Defendants filed the Motion. See Motion at 1. The Defendants argue, as an initial matter, that Green and Hightower are not liable under the NMTCA and for malicious prosecution, because there is no evidence that those officers caused the purported harm. See Motion at 6 n.1 (citing Pahls v. Thomas, 718 F.3d 1210, 1231 (10th Cir. 2013) ).6 The Defendants also argue that the claim against the Lincoln County Sheriff's Department fails, because it is a subdivision of Lincoln County. See Motion at 6 n.1 (citing Hunter v. Luna Cty. Detention Ctr., No. 11–0954 (D.N.M. September 6, 2012)(Doc. 84)(Vidmar, M.J.) ). They also contend that Lincoln County and the Lincoln County Sheriff's Department cannot be liable on any of the individual claims, because they are not individuals capable of causing the constitutional and tort harms alleged. See Motion at 6, n.1.

The Defendants also argue that Wood did not clearly commit a violation under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America when Wood pushed McGarry into the kitchen counter and handcuffed him on the ground. See Motion at 7. They...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico – 2021
Reeves v. Chafin
"...underlying state law charges’ elements are. See Wilder v. Turner, 490 F.3d at 814. McGarry v. Bd. of Cty. Commissioners for Cty. of Lincoln, 294 F. Supp. 3d 1170, 1203 n.18 (D.N.M. 2018) (Browning, J.). The Tenth Circuit's § 1983 definition of malice is not tied to a state law definition of..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico – 2019
Ganley v. Jojola
"...when it dismisses all of a case's federal claims with prejudice. See, e.g., McGarry v. Bd. of Cty. Commissioners for Cty. of Lincoln, 294 F. Supp. 3d 1170, 1206 (D.N.M. 2018) (Browning, J.)("The only remaining claim before the Court is McGarry's NMTCA claim.... The Court declines to exercis..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico – 2018
Manzanares v. Roosevelt Cnty. Adult Det. Ctr.
"...clearly established where ‘a distinction might make a constitutional difference.’ " McGarry v. Board of County Commissioners for County of Lincoln, 294 F.Supp.3d 1170, 1187 (D.N.M. 2018) (Browning, J.)(quoting Kerns v. Bader, 663 F.3d at 1188 ). As explained above, and in prior cases, the C..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico – 2018
Sinfuego v. Curry Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners
"...jurisdiction when it dismisses all of a case's federal claims with prejudice. See, e.g., McGarry v. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs for Cty. of Lincoln, 294 F.Supp.3d 1170, 1206 (D.N.M. 2018) (Browning, J.)("The only remaining claim before the Court is McGarry's NMTCA claim....118 The Court declines to..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico – 2019
Quintana v. Santa Fe Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
"...that any other similar events occurred." MTD Reply at 10. The Defendants contend that, pursuant to McGarry v. Board of County Commissioners, 294 F. Supp. 3d 1170 (D.N.M. 2018)(Browning, J.), the Plaintiffs bear the burden of proving the law violated was clearly established at the time of th..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico – 2021
Reeves v. Chafin
"...underlying state law charges’ elements are. See Wilder v. Turner, 490 F.3d at 814. McGarry v. Bd. of Cty. Commissioners for Cty. of Lincoln, 294 F. Supp. 3d 1170, 1203 n.18 (D.N.M. 2018) (Browning, J.). The Tenth Circuit's § 1983 definition of malice is not tied to a state law definition of..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico – 2019
Ganley v. Jojola
"...when it dismisses all of a case's federal claims with prejudice. See, e.g., McGarry v. Bd. of Cty. Commissioners for Cty. of Lincoln, 294 F. Supp. 3d 1170, 1206 (D.N.M. 2018) (Browning, J.)("The only remaining claim before the Court is McGarry's NMTCA claim.... The Court declines to exercis..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico – 2018
Manzanares v. Roosevelt Cnty. Adult Det. Ctr.
"...clearly established where ‘a distinction might make a constitutional difference.’ " McGarry v. Board of County Commissioners for County of Lincoln, 294 F.Supp.3d 1170, 1187 (D.N.M. 2018) (Browning, J.)(quoting Kerns v. Bader, 663 F.3d at 1188 ). As explained above, and in prior cases, the C..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico – 2018
Sinfuego v. Curry Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners
"...jurisdiction when it dismisses all of a case's federal claims with prejudice. See, e.g., McGarry v. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs for Cty. of Lincoln, 294 F.Supp.3d 1170, 1206 (D.N.M. 2018) (Browning, J.)("The only remaining claim before the Court is McGarry's NMTCA claim....118 The Court declines to..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico – 2019
Quintana v. Santa Fe Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
"...that any other similar events occurred." MTD Reply at 10. The Defendants contend that, pursuant to McGarry v. Board of County Commissioners, 294 F. Supp. 3d 1170 (D.N.M. 2018)(Browning, J.), the Plaintiffs bear the burden of proving the law violated was clearly established at the time of th..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex