Monsanto v. Canada (Health),

"...Potash Esterhazy Limited Partnership v Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc, 2011 SKCA 120 at paragraph 26; Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at paragraph 50; Spencer v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 361 at paragraph 51; Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 846..."

"...at the first stage: RJR-MacDonald, at pp. 338-339; Peters First Nation v. Lock, 2024 FC 113, at para 30; Monsanto v. Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053, at paras 44, 56. In this case, I do not believe that granting the requested stay removes any potential benefit from either party proceeding to ..."

"...three elements of the test are cumulative, but strength in one factor may overcome weakness on another (see Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at para 50. It is important to remember that an interlocutory injunction is equitable relief, and a degree of flexibility must be preserved in..."

"...either party. These public interest considerations will carry less weight in exemption cases than in suspension cases. 33 2021 FC 361 34 2020 FC 1053, at paragraph 35 See – Spencer v The Attorney General of Canada, supra, at paragraph 51 36 [2022] JMFC FULL 06 37 [1991] 1 WLR 550 38 [2010]..."

"...three elements of the test are cumulative, but strength in one factor may overcome weakness on another (see Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at para 50 [Monsanto]). It is important to remember that an interlocutory injunction is equitable relief, and a degree of flexibility must be ..."

"...wish to thank Stefanie Thibert, articling student, for her help in preparing this legal update. Footnotes 1 Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 2 Minimizing the Risk of Exposure to COVID-19 in Canada Order (Mandatory Isolation), No. 7, PC 2020-0840. 3 Quarantine Act, SC 2005, c 20. 4 R..."

"...Potash Esterhazy Limited Partnership v Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc, 2011 SKCA 120 at paragraph 26; Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at paragraph 50; Spencer v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 361 at paragraph 51; Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 846..."

"...at the first stage: RJR-MacDonald, at pp. 338-339; Peters First Nation v. Lock, 2024 FC 113, at para 30; Monsanto v. Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053, at paras 44, 56. In this case, I do not believe that granting the requested stay removes any potential benefit from either party proceeding to ..."

"...three elements of the test are cumulative, but strength in one factor may overcome weakness on another (see Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at para 50. It is important to remember that an interlocutory injunction is equitable relief, and a degree of flexibility must be preserved in..."

"...either party. These public interest considerations will carry less weight in exemption cases than in suspension cases. 33 2021 FC 361 34 2020 FC 1053, at paragraph 35 See – Spencer v The Attorney General of Canada, supra, at paragraph 51 36 [2022] JMFC FULL 06 37 [1991] 1 WLR 550 38 [2010]..."

"...three elements of the test are cumulative, but strength in one factor may overcome weakness on another (see Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at para 50 [Monsanto]). It is important to remember that an interlocutory injunction is equitable relief, and a degree of flexibility must be ..."

"...wish to thank Stefanie Thibert, articling student, for her help in preparing this legal update. Footnotes 1 Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 2 Minimizing the Risk of Exposure to COVID-19 in Canada Order (Mandatory Isolation), No. 7, PC 2020-0840. 3 Quarantine Act, SC 2005, c 20. 4 R..."