Sign Up for Vincent AI
Moon v. Coursey
Federal Public Defender
C. RENÉE MANES
Assistant Federal Public Defender
101 S.W. Main Street, Suite 1700
Portland, OR 97204
Attorneys for Petitioner
Attorney General
Assistant Attorney General
Department of Justice
1162 Court Street N.E.
Salem, OR 97301-4096
Attorneys for Respondent
Petitioner Medero P. Moon, an inmate at the Oregon State Penitentiary, brings this habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his Fifth Claim for Relief, Petitioner alleges his conviction for Kidnapping in the First Degree violates the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution because there was insufficient evidence to convict him and he is actually innocent of that offense. Pet'r's Am. Habeas Pet. (ECF No. 13) at 14.1
This Court previously denied habeas relief on the basis, inter alia, that Petitioner procedurally defaulted his available state remedies and was precluded from demonstrating actual innocence to excuse his procedural default. Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 65) & Order (ECF No. 69). The Ninth Circuit reversed, holding Petitioner is not precluded from making a gateway showing of actual innocence and remanded to permit Petitioner to do so. Moon v. Coursey, No. 13-36155, Mem. Op. (ECF No. 73) at 1-3. For the reasons that follow, this Courtconcludes on remand that Petitioner has made a gateway showing of actual innocence2 and that habeas relief is warranted.
On August 20, 2000, Petitioner, Calvin Davis, and Jessica Rydman entered the home of Wayne Olson with the intent to commit a robbery. During the course of the robbery Petitioner killed Olson by shooting him in the back of the head at close range. Petitioner and Rydman subsequently surrendered to police and made incriminating statements. Gresham Police Detective Mike McGowen summarized Rydman's statements concerning the details of the crime as follows:
Resp't Exs. to Answer - Part A (ECF No. 20), Ex. 117 at 13. See also Resp't Exs. 119, 121, & 124.
Rydman estimated they were in Olson's house for one-half hour. Resp't Ex. 117 at 5-6. With regard to the physical location of Olson during the course of the robbery, Rydman told police:
Id. at 5-6. In a subsequent interview a police detective questioned Rydman about whether Olson was moved during the robbery:
Petitioner conveyed a similar story to Multnomah County Sheriff Detective Hollie Lincoln, which she summarized as follows:
A grand jury indicted Petitioner on charges of Aggravated Murder (six counts), Felony Murder (three counts), Robbery in the First Degree with a Firearm, Burglary in the First Degree with a Firearm, and Kidnapping in the First Degree with a Firearm. Resp't Ex. 102. The Kidnapping charge provides as follows:
[O]n or about August 20, 2000, in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon, [Petitioner] did unlawfully and knowingly, without consent or legal authority, take WAYNE E OLSON from one place to another, with intent to interfere substantially with the said WAYNE E OLSON's personal liberty, and with the purpose of causing physical injury to WAYNE E OLSON, and during the commission of this felony, the [Petitioner] did use and threaten the use of a firearm, contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State of Oregon.
Id. at 3-4 (emphasis in original).
On May 20, 2002, Petitioner signed a plea petition agreeing to plead guilty to one count of Aggravated Murder (murder in the course of committing the crime of Robbery in the First Degree) and Kidnapping in the First Degree with a Firearm. Resp't Ex. 103 at 1. With regard to the kidnapping charge, Petitioner admitted he unlawfully and knowingly took Olson from one place to another intending to substantially interfere with his personal liberty and cause physical injury to him. Id. at 2. See also Tr. (ECF No. 19), Vol. 3 at 30-31. As part of the plea agreement Petitioner agreed to cooperate with the Multnomah County District Attorney's Office and to testify truthfully at all proceedings.Resp't Ex. 198. Had Petitioner had complied with the conditions of the plea agreement, his Kidnapping conviction would have been dismissed after five years. Tr., Vol. 3 at 39.
Petitioner, however, breached the plea agreement by refusing to testify against Calvin Davis. See Resp't Exs. to Answer - Part B (ECF No. 21), Ex. 187 at 1; Tr., Part C (ECF No. 87), Vol. 7 at 167-68. Consequently, on July 10, 2003, Petitioner was sentenced to a term of life with the possibility of parole in 30 years, for Aggravated Murder, and for a consecutive 230-month upward departure sentence for Kidnapping in the First Degree. Resp't Ex. 101. The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion, and the Oregon Supreme Court denied review. State v. Moon, 126 P.3d 4 (Or. App.), withdrawn on recons., 142 P.3d 105 (Or. App.), rev. denied, 148 P.3d 915 (Or. 2006).
Calvin Davis was tried separately on charges of Aggravated Murder (6 counts), Robbery in the First Degree, Burglary in the First Degree, Kidnapping in the Second Degree, Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle with a Firearm (2 counts), and Felon in Possession of a Firearm. Resp't Ex. 222. Jessica Rydman testified on behalf of the prosecution consistent with her previous statements to police. See Tr., Part C, Vol. 5 at 199.
Detective Hollie Lincoln testified to Petitioner's out-of-court statements to police:
Glenna Olson, the decedent's wife, testified to the location of her husband's body when she discovered it:
Tr., Part B (ECF No. 86), Vol. 4 at 79-80. See also Resp't Ex. 192 (). Multnomah County...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting