Onyebuchi N. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Esther N.)

206 A.D.3d 564

171 N.Y.S.3d 96

In the MATTER OF ESTHER N. and Others, Children Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc.,

Onyebuchi N., Respondent–Appellant,

v.Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

16217

Dkt. Nos. NN-10393/20, NN-10394/20, NN-10395/20, NN-10396/20

Case No. 2021–03717

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

ENTERED June 28, 2022

Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant.

Sylvia O. Hinds–Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Jeremy Pepper of counsel), for respondent.

Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), attorney for the children.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Oing, Gonza´lez, Scarpulla, Higgitt, JJ.

Order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper), Family Court, Bronx County (E. Grace Park, J.), entered on or about September 23, 2021, insofar as it determined, after a hearing, that respondent father neglected the four subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The findings of neglect were supported by a preponderance of the evidence that the father committed acts of domestic violence in the presence of two of the children and while the other two children were in the apartment (see Family Ct Act §§ 1012[f][i][B] ; 1046[b][i]; Matter of Tammie Z., 66 N.Y.2d 1, 3, 494 N.Y.S.2d 686, 484 N.E.2d 1038 [1985] ). The credited testimony of the mother and the caseworker at the fact-finding hearing demonstrated that the father punched the mother with a closed fist while he was arguing with her about the family's expenses in the living room where two of the children were present, and then continued fighting with her behind a closed bedroom door, leading the children to ask him to stop and to summon the police (see Matter of J.R.M.-C. [Antonio M.], 176 A.D.3d 623, 624, 110 N.Y.S.3d 676 [1st Dept. 2019] ). The two children's out-of-court statements that after they saw the father punch the mother with a closed fist, the eldest daughter summoned the police to stop the altercation as testified to by the caseworker was supported by the mother's testimony about the incident (see Matter of Zamir D. [Peter J.D.], 201 A.D.3d 403, 156 N.Y.S.3d 724 [1st Dept. 2022] ; Matter of Jamya C. [Jermaine F.], 165 A.D.3d 410, 410, 82 N.Y.S.3d 715 [1st Dept. 2018] ).

A single instance of domestic violence may be a proper basis for a finding of neglect (see Matter of Bobbi B. [Bobby B.], 165 A.D.3d 587, 587, 87 N.Y.S.3d 177 [1st Dept. 2018] ). Contrary to the father's contention, the record, including the mother's testimony that those children told her that they summoned the police because they were scared of what he was going to do to her, supports the finding that the two older children were in danger of or were emotionally impaired by the domestic violence that he inflicted upon the mother while they were present (see Matter of Jamya C. [Jermaine F.], 165 A.D.3d 410, 410, 82 N.Y.S.3d 715 [1st Dept. 2018] ; Matter of Isaiah D. [Mark D.], 159 A.D.3d 534, 535, 72 N.Y.S.3d 84 [1st Dept. 2018] ).

Furthermore, the two younger children, who were in their own bedroom when the incident occurred, were in imminent danger of physical impairment due to their proximity to the violence directed at the mother even in the absence of evidence that they were aware of the incident or emotionally affected by it (see Matter of Athena M. [Manuel M.T.], 190 A.D.3d 644, 644, 136 N.Y.S.3d 740 [1st...