Sign Up for Vincent AI
Paul Beverage Co. v. Am. Bottling Co.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant The American Bottling Company's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed December 6, 2018. (ECF No. 40). The motion is fully briefed and ready for disposition.
Plaintiff Paul Beverage Co., Inc. ("Paul Beverage" or "Plaintiff"), is a Missouri corporation with its principal place of business located in Jefferson County, Missouri. (Defendant The American Bottling Co.'s ("ABC" or "Defendant") Statement of Uncontroverted Material Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment ("ABC's Facts"), ¶ 1). ABC was a successor-in-interest to Seven Up Bottling Company of St. Louis, Inc., and is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located in Plano, Texas. (Id., ¶ 2).
On or about November 26, 1990, Paul Beverage and ABC entered into a "Distributor and Consignment Agreement" ("Agreement"), whereby the parties agreed that Paul Beverage, as an independent business enterprise, would distribute ABC's products pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. (ABC's Facts, ¶ 4). The Agreement contained the following relevant provisions:
(Agreement, attached to ABC's Facts as Exh. A, PP. 1-3, 5, 6, 9, 10-11).
Prior to 2016, Paul Beverage operated as a warehouse distributor, meaning it serviced customers using inventory maintained in its own warehouses. (Plaintiff's Statement of Additional Material Facts ("Plaintiff's Facts"), ¶¶ 7, 8). In early 2016, Paul Beverage maintains ABC approached it, and asked if Plaintiff would take additional territory and customers in South St. Louis County and South St. Louis City. (Id., ¶ 17). Paul Beverage began servicing the new territory in approximately March, 2016. (Id., ¶ 18).
Also in early 2016, ABC asked Paul Beverage to move to a cross-docking operation. (Plaintiff's Facts, ¶ 25). Under cross-docking, rather than maintain inventory in the distributor's warehouse, product is received by the distributor from ABC's Hazelwood facility daily. (Id., ¶ 26). Those products are then reloaded onto the distributor's trucks for delivery to customers. (Id.). Paul Beverage began cross-docking in July, 2016. (Id., ¶ 28). According to Mark W. Paul ("Mark Paul"), the President of Paul Beverage from April, 1983 to July 28, 2017, Plaintiff experienced issues after the move to cross-docking including, but not limited to, late deliveries, deliveries of fallen and damaged product, deliveries of incorrect trailers and product, and incomplete deliveries due to out-of-stock product in ABC's Hazelwood facility. (Id., ¶ 30, citing Mark Paul Declaration, attached to Plaintiff's Facts as Exh. 3, ¶ 15).1 Charles Parish, Plaintiff'sdistrict manager2, confirmed that if there were delays with product coming in, that would cause a "domino effect", including problems with merchandising. (See Plaintiff's Facts, ¶ 31, citing Parish Dep., PP. 205-06).
With respect to promoting Defendant's product, ABC asserts it had an incentives program designed to increase both the distributor's earnings and ABC's sales, but that from 2015 to 2017, Paul Beverage failed to meet incentives goals on many more occasions than other similar distributors. (ABC's Facts, ¶¶ 10-11, citing Dan Schmidt Decl., ¶¶ 9, 10 and attached Exh. B). Plaintiff disputes ABC's claim on several fronts. First, Plaintiff maintains the document cited by ABC, Exhibit B, actually reflects that Paul Beverage met as many or more incentive levels in numerous months than one or more of the comparison distributors. (See Plaintiff's Response to ABC's Facts, ¶ 10, citing ECF No. 43-2, PP. 4-15, 17-19, 21-23). Plaintiff further maintains that ABC failed to provide materials to Paul Beverage necessary to meet goals within the incentives program on at least ten occasions; that ABC did not always credit Paul Beverage for achieving goals in the incentives program; and that Paul Beverage engaged in its own promotion of ABC's products, by sponsoring or donating product at its own expense to fundraising events held by churches, police organizations, the Rotary Club and the local Chamber of Commerce. (Plaintiff's Facts, ¶¶ 55, 56, 58, citing Parish Dep., PP. 61-63, 83; Mark Paul Dep., attached to Plaintiff's Facts as Exh. 10, PP. 68-69, 70; Mark R. Paul Dep., attached to...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting