Sign Up for Vincent AI
People v. Harbor
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County No NA065766, William C. Ryan, Judge. Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.
Karyn H. Bucur, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant Attorney General, Roberta L. Davis and William H. Shin, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Travyon Charles Harbor was convicted of second degree murder and premeditated attempted murder in 2005. Approximately 14 years later, he filed a petition for writ of error coram nobis claiming that the prosecutor failed to disclose secret recordings of witness interviews, and that newly discovered evidence of witnesses recanting their trial testimony proved his actual innocence. Harbor also requested postconviction discovery of evidence related to the recorded witness interviews, among other things. The court denied Harbor's petition and his request for discovery. We affirm the court's denial of Harbor's petition and dismiss his appeal of the court's denial of his request for postconviction discovery.
The following factual summary is taken from our opinion in Harbor's direct appeal. (People v. Harbor (Nov 20, 2007, B187911) [nonpub. opn.].)
“Detective Goodman testified it appeared gunfire had hit the front of a Buick Regal, which was parked very close to where Garcia had been standing when she was shot.
On August 25, 2005, a jury convicted Harbor of second degree murder (Pen. Code, [3] § 187, subd. (a)) and premeditated attempted murder (§§ 664, 187, subd. (a)), with firearm and prior serious felony conviction enhancements (§§ 667, subd. (a)-(i), 12022.53). The court sentenced Harbor to 200 years to life.
Harbor moved for a new trial on October 5, 2005, arguing that there was newly discovered evidence that he acted in self-defense. He submitted interview statements from Aretha Bonner who stated she saw Saulsberry fire multiple shots towards Harbor, and Natealie Sherman who stated that only Saulsberry and an unidentified Hispanic man fired shots towards the victim Garcia. The court denied the motion and Harbor appealed.
We affirmed the court's denial of Harbor's motion for a new trial but remanded the matter for resentencing. On remand, Harbor was resentenced to 95 years to life.
In May 2008, Harbor moved again for a new trial, arguing that newly discovered evidence showed that he acted in self-defense and the prosecutor failed to disclose exculpatory evidence. In addition to the interview statements from Bonner and Sherman, Harbor attached handwritten investigation notes from two detectives that indicated they interviewed a witness who saw Saulsberry shoot three times from his car. The court construed Harbor's motion for a new trial as a petition for writ of habeas corpus and denied the petition.
From July 2008 through March 2018, Harbor filed multiple habeas petitions, including three in this court, two in our Supreme Court, and one in the United States District Court. Each petition was denied.
In April 2019, Harbor filed another habeas petition in the superior court. The petition alleged that: (1) the prosecutor committed a Brady[4]violation by failing to disclose evidence related to detectives' recordings of witness interviews; (2) the prosecutor and police obtained Smith's false testimony by bribing her with promises to return her children to her custody and to help her...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting