People v. Martin

181 N.Y.S.3d 927 (Mem)

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,

v.Trevor MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.

69

KA 19-01413

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Entered: February 10, 2023

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (SUSAN R. HUTCHISON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (JERRY MARTI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND OGDEN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree ( Penal Law § 265.03 [3] ), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v. Thomas , 34 N.Y.3d 545, 565-566, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020] ; People v. Gordon , 191 A.D.3d 1367, 1368, 140 N.Y.S.3d 662 [4th Dept. 2021], lv denied 36 N.Y.3d 1120, 146 N.Y.S.3d 207, 169 N.E.3d 565 [2021] ; People v. Clark , 191 A.D.3d 1485, 1485, 141 N.Y.S.3d 829 [4th Dept. 2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 954, 147 N.Y.S.3d 546, 170 N.E.3d 420 [2021] ). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.