Case Law People v. Medina

People v. Medina

Document Cited Authorities (2) Cited in (6) Related

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stending of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Jacob Wells on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed July 18, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Sulsona, 134 A.D.3d 861, 19 N.Y.S.3d 909 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., RIVERA, DICKERSON, HINDS–RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.

4 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2017
People v. Romero
"...waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Medina, 138 A.D.3d 1148, 28 N.Y.S.3d 893 ; People v. Sulsona, 134 A.D.3d 861, 19 N.Y.S.3d 909 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence clai..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2016
In re Maurice M.
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2016
People v. Porter
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2016
People v. Chestnut
"...purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Worrell, 138 A.D.3d 1154, 1155, 30 N.Y.S.3d 318 ; People v. Medina, 138 A.D.3d 1148, 28 N.Y.S.3d 893 ), and thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2017
People v. Romero
"...waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Medina, 138 A.D.3d 1148, 28 N.Y.S.3d 893 ; People v. Sulsona, 134 A.D.3d 861, 19 N.Y.S.3d 909 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence clai..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2016
In re Maurice M.
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2016
People v. Porter
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2016
People v. Chestnut
"...purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Worrell, 138 A.D.3d 1154, 1155, 30 N.Y.S.3d 318 ; People v. Medina, 138 A.D.3d 1148, 28 N.Y.S.3d 893 ), and thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex