Case Law People v. Seay

People v. Seay

Document Cited Authorities (3) Cited in (11) Related

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT L. KEMP OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal contempt in the first degree ( Penal Law § 215.51 [b] [v] ), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v. Alls , 187 A.D.3d 1515, 1515, 129 N.Y.S.3d 881 [4th Dept. 2020] ), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

We note, however, that the certificate of conviction incorrectly reflects that defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 3 1/3 to 4 years, and it must be amended to reflect that he was sentenced to an indeterminate term...

5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
People v. Ramos
"...is invalid, and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v. Seay , 201 A.D.3d 1361, 1361-1362, 158 N.Y.S.3d 697 [4th Dept. 2022] ), we nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. However, as defendant contends ..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
People v. Shaffer
"...is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v. Seay , 201 A.D.3d 1361, 1361-1362, 158 N.Y.S.3d 697 [4th Dept. 2022] ), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.We agree with defendant, however, that the uni..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
People v. Blaszyk
"...is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v. Seay , 201 A.D.3d 1361, 1361-1362, 158 N.Y.S.3d 697 [4th Dept. 2022] ), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Contrary to defendant's further contention, w..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
People v. Mowery
"...invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v. Seay , 201 A.D.3d 1361, 1361-1362, 158 N.Y.S.3d 697 [4th Dept. 2022] ), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or "
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2024
People v. Ball
"...is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v. Seay, 201 A.D.3d 1361, 1361-1362, 158 N.Y.S.3d 697 [4th Dept. 2022]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
People v. Ramos
"...is invalid, and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v. Seay , 201 A.D.3d 1361, 1361-1362, 158 N.Y.S.3d 697 [4th Dept. 2022] ), we nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. However, as defendant contends ..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
People v. Shaffer
"...is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v. Seay , 201 A.D.3d 1361, 1361-1362, 158 N.Y.S.3d 697 [4th Dept. 2022] ), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.We agree with defendant, however, that the uni..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
People v. Blaszyk
"...is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v. Seay , 201 A.D.3d 1361, 1361-1362, 158 N.Y.S.3d 697 [4th Dept. 2022] ), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Contrary to defendant's further contention, w..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
People v. Mowery
"...invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v. Seay , 201 A.D.3d 1361, 1361-1362, 158 N.Y.S.3d 697 [4th Dept. 2022] ), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or "
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2024
People v. Ball
"...is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v. Seay, 201 A.D.3d 1361, 1361-1362, 158 N.Y.S.3d 697 [4th Dept. 2022]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex