Sign Up for Vincent AI
Pepper Constr. Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condos., LLC
Gino L. DiVito, John M. Fitzgerald, Jordan E. Wilkow, and Jonathan S. Kim, of Tabet DiVito & Rothstein LLC, of Chicago, and Bruce W. Ficken (pro hac vice) and James M. Kwartnik (pro hac vice), of Cozen O'Connor, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for appellant.
Ethan E. Trull, Keith E. Edeus, Seth A. Horvath, and Elizabeth Z. Meraz, of Nixon Peabody LLP, of Chicago, for appellee.
¶ 1 This appeal concerns a dispute between a general contractor for a construction project, Pepper Construction Company (Pepper), and one of its subcontractors, Bourbon Marble, Inc. (Bourbon). Beginning in 2004, Pepper, Bourbon, and other subcontractors worked on an interior build-out of approximately 96 condominium units in a building owned by Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC (Palmolive), and located at 919 North Michigan Ave in Chicago. The project was rife with problems, and Pepper and Bourbon stopped working on the project in March 2007. Pepper and the subcontractors participated in arbitration proceedings against Palmolive. Eventually, Pepper settled with Palmolive, and only issues between Pepper and Bourbon remained. In the circuit court proceedings leading to this appeal, Bourbon pursued breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims against Pepper. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment for Bourbon on both claims. Bourbon was awarded $271,687.87 for the breach of contract claim, $400,131.92 for the unjust enrichment claim, and $3,657,984.08 in attorney fees and costs. Pepper appealed, and Bourbon cross-appealed. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
¶ 3 The parties’ arguments on appeal span the long history of this case. We recounted some of the following facts in a previous opinion, Pepper Construction Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC , 2016 IL App (1st) 142754, 405 Ill.Dec. 748, 59 N.E.3d 41 ( Pepper I ), and provide additional background below.
Pepper would not settle all or any part of its claims against Palmolive that related to or impacted any subcontractors’ claims without the participation of and express advance written authorization from the affected subcontractor.
¶ 6 The JILA included provisions about sharing information, but those arrangements were not to be construed "to affect each Party's separate and independent representation by counsel." Pepper and the subcontractors were "free to engage independent outside counsel and/or consultants for any purpose." However, that engagement was solely at the expense of the party retaining the counsel or consultants.
¶ 7 Each subcontractor retained responsibility, including financial responsibility, for proving its entitlement and quantification of its claim and the accuracy of its portion of Pepper's claim submitted in the arbitration. As general contractor, Pepper had "overall responsibility for all matters asserted" in the arbitration and retained "final decision making authority over the procedural aspects and presentation of all matters submitted" in the arbitration. Still, each subcontractor would "present its own claim in the Arbitration and assume all financial responsibility for doing so."
¶ 8 The JILA provided as follows for how an arbitration award would be distributed:
...
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialTry vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting