Sign Up for Vincent AI
Pereyra v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.
Currently pending before the Court is Defendant's motion to compel arbitration. The Court ruled from the bench that there are four unconscionable provisions all of which can be severed or reformed. For the reasons stated on the record and as memorialized, clarified and supplemented herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to compel arbitration.
Plaintiff seeks to file a class action for claims arising under the California Labor Codes §§ 510; 1198; 226.7(a); 512(a); 226.7(a); 226(a); 201-203; 221-224 et seq.; and violations of the Business and Professions Code § 17200 et seq. Complaint ("Compl.") Plaintiff argues that she and other class members are entitled to premium wages for overtime pay based on a regular rate with commission and bonuses. Id. ¶ 8. She alleges that Defendant denied her, and other class members, minimum wages owed to her and others based on overtime work laws, wages upon discharge, and compensation for meals and rest breaks. Id. Similarly, Plaintiff claims that Defendant failed to keep accurate payroll and wage statements in accordance with California law. Id.
She also raises a breach of contract claim. She claims the breach of her employment contract was the failure "to provide Plaintiff with the draw amount as stated and in the proper amounts, failing to provide Plaintiff with the basis points on each loan, failing to pay the correct commission payments for loans originated, failing to pay the enhanced commission, failing to pay accurate monthly commissions after submitting questions within the time required, failing to pay all wages owed per the contract for each pay period, and imposing deductions for expenses not contemplated by the employment contract." Id. ¶ 32.
Plaintiff worked as an employee of Defendant from August 2015 to August 2016. Id. ¶ 13. She held the position of mortgage specialist in Orange County, California. Id. She contends that in that position she regularly worked over eight hours a day and more than 40 hours a week without overtime pay or compensation for meal and rest breaks. Id.
After Plaintiff filed the Complaint, Defendant moved to compel arbitration and to dismiss the action under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1). Defendant's Motion to Compel ("Mot."). The basis for this motion is an arbitration agreement in Plaintiff's employment contract.
Plaintiff opposes the motion to compel arbitration on several grounds. She argues the contract is procedurally unconscionable because it was a contract of adhesion and Defendant failed to include the AAA rules. Opposition to Motion to Compel ("Opp'n") at 1. She also challenges the agreement on substantive unconscionability grounds, asserting that it lacked mutuality, it requires Plaintiff to waive un-waivable claims, and allows Defendant to recover attorneys' fees and costs in violation of California law. Id. She also argues that both the choice of law provision and choice of forum provision are unconscionable. Id. at 14-15. Despite the choice of law clause, Defendant does not argue that Illinois law applies here. Reply at 6.
A. The Contract
On July 24, 2015, Plaintiff signed an arbitration agreement. This agreement was superseded by a contract signed by Plaintiff on July 8, 2016. Confusingly, the parties have each submitted the arbitration agreement for a different employee (the plaintiff in the related case Turng). Turng v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc., 371 F. Supp. 3d 610, 615 (N.D. Cal. 2019). However,both parties agree that it is identical to the copy of the arbitration agreement provided to Plaintiff in this matter. The relevant provisions of the arbitration agreement read:
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting