Sign Up for Vincent AI
Pfadt v. Wheels Assured Delivery Sys., Inc.
Attorneys for Appellants: James F. Ludlow, Indianapolis, Indiana, Bryan H. Babb, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana, James M. Dubach, Hankey Law Office, Indianapolis, Indiana
Attorney for Appellees: Jacob M. O'Brien, Starr Austen & Miller, LLP, Logansport, Indiana
[1] Jennifer Pfadt, individually, and Amanda Mitchell, as personal representative of the estate of Gregory Mitchell, (collectively, "Plaintiffs") appeal following the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Wheels Assured Delivery Systems, Inc. ("Wheels Assured"). Plaintiffs allege the trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding:
We reverse and remand.
[2] Shortly after 4:00 a.m. on June 1, 2017, Jonathan R. Zeigler was driving southbound on State Road 1 in Allen County, Indiana, when his vehicle crossed the center line and struck Gregory Mitchell's car head-on. Zeigler and Mitchell both died as a result of the collision, and Zeigler's front-seat passenger, Pfadt, sustained significant injuries. At the time of the accident, Zeigler was traveling the "Auburn Route" and delivering packages for Wheels Assured, a commercial logistics and delivery service. (App. Vol. II at 80.)
[3] On June 27, 2018, Pfadt filed suit against Wheels Assured.1 Pfadt alleged Wheels Assured was responsible for Zeigler's negligence because he was acting within the course and scope of his employment for Wheels Assured at the time of the accident. Pfadt also alleged Wheels Assured was negligent in hiring and retaining Zeigler. On May 31, 2019, Amanda Mitchell, as personal representative of the estate of Gregory Mitchell, filed suit against Zeigler's estate and Wheels Assured. Mitchell also alleged Zeigler was acting in the course and scope of his employment for Wheels Assured at the time of the accident. In each answer, Wheels Assured denied Zeigler was an employee of Wheels Assured at the time of the accident. The trial court consolidated the two suits on July 15, 2019.
[4] On September 20, 2019, Wheels Assured filed a motion for summary judgment. Wheels Assured asserted it was entitled to summary judgment on the basis that it was not liable for Zeigler's alleged negligence because he was an independent contractor at the time of the accident and Indiana law generally does not impose vicarious liability against the principal for the negligent actions of an independent contractor. In support of its motion, Wheels Assured designated a copy of the contract between Wheels Assured and Zeigler. The contract was labeled "INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT " ("ICA") and went into effect on February 20, 2017. (App. Vol. II at 115) (formatting in original). The ICA, referring to Zeigler as "CONTRACTOR" and Wheels Assured as "COMPANY", stated in relevant part:
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting