Sign Up for Vincent AI
Pizzati v. DS Servs. of Am., Inc.
Jean-Marc Bonin, Alexandre E. Bonin, R. Christian Bonin, BONIN LAW, 4224 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA 70119, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT
Keith J. Landry, ALLEN & GOOCH, A Law Corporation, 2000 Kaliste Saloom Road, Suite 400, P.O. Box 81129, Lafayette, LA 70598-1129, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE
(Court composed of Judge Rosemary Ledet, Judge Tiffany Gautier Chase, Judge Dale N. Atkins )
This is a workers’ compensation case. The principal issue presented on appeal is whether the Office of Workers’ Compensation (hereinafter "OWC") erred in finding that the claimant/employee, David Pizzati (hereinafter "Claimant"), failed to meet his burden of proving that he sustained a work-related accident on March 17, 2020. Claimant appeals from two interlocutory judgments and a final judgment rendered by the OWC on January 25, 2021. One of the interlocutory judgments granted the "Motion to Strike Claimant's Pre-Trial Statement" filed by Claimant's employer, DS Services of America, Inc., (hereinafter "DS Services"), and its insurer, Safety National Casualty Corporation (hereinafter "Safety National"); and the other interlocutory judgment denied Claimant's "Opposed Motion to Continue Trial."1 The final judgment, in pertinent part, determined that Claimant failed to prove a compensable accident within the course and scope of his employment.2
Exhibits admitted into evidence proved Claimant sustained a compensable accident. Hence, the OWC committed manifest error in finding that Claimant failed to prove a compensable work-related accident. Having determined that Claimant proved a compensable accident moots review of the interlocutory judgments for error. Accordingly, for the following reasons, we reverse the final judgment as to Claimant's failure to prove a compensable accident, and hereby remand the matter to the OWC to permit Claimant to file any other workers’ compensation claims arising out of his March 17, 2020 accident as permitted by the workers’ compensation statutes.
The record and exhibits admitted into evidence established the following facts. In March 2020, DS Services employed Claimant as a route sales representative, which job included the task of transporting loads of water products to businesses and residences. On March 17, 2020, Claimant notified his DS Services supervisor, Jeff Sullivan (hereinafter "Mr. Sullivan"), that he experienced a work-related injury to his lower back that day. A form titled "Workers Compensation – First Report of Injury or Illness," which was prepared by Claimant on March 17, 2020, provided that "[Claimant] alleges that approx[imately] 4 hours ago he stood up after sitting down for approx[imately] 15 minutes while planning out his route and he felt pain to his lower back which has worsened throughout the day."
After Claimant notified Mr. Sullivan of his injury on March 17, 2020, Mr. Sullivan advised Claimant to go for treatment at Concentra Medical Centers (LA) (hereinafter "Concentra"). That same day Claimant reported to Dr. Lawrence Counts, M.D., (hereinafter "Dr. Counts") at Concentra and presented with right-sided back pain. The "History of Present Illness" section of Dr. Counts’ report from Claimant's March 17, 2020 visit provided that Per the report, Dr. Counts "advised [Claimant] to follow [ ] prescribed work restrictions to avoid the risk of prolonged injury and worsening/reoccurrence of his current injury[.]" Thus, Claimant returned to work on restricted duty.
On April 8, 2020, Claimant received from DS Services a "Notice of Layoff" letter, which advised that he had been laid off because of "changes in business conditions." The letter explained that Claimant's last day of work was that day, April 8, 2020, and that his layoff was effective April 10, 2020. Additionally, the letter advised that Claimant would be eligible for unemployment benefits.
Thereafter, on May 26, 2020, Claimant filed a Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Disputed Claim for Compensation (Form 1008) (hereinafter "1008 Form"),3 wherein he alleged that he injured his lower back on March 17, 2020. On the 1008 Form, Claimant stated he was lifting and carrying water products on the morning of the accident and that he experienced the onset of pain in his lower back while stepping off of his work vehicle. He advised that a bona fide dispute existed because no wage benefits had been paid; his disability status was temporary total disability (hereinafter "TTD")4 ; and that he sought all penalties, attorney's fees, costs, and interest as allowed by law for the failure of DS Services and Safety National (hereinafter collectively "Employer") to pay wage benefits. Claimant did not allege any dispute(s) involving his medical treatment or choice of physician. Additionally, Claimant listed his average weekly wage as $1,425.00 and his compensation rate as $688.00 per week.
In an Answer filed on July 6, 2020, Employer denied the general allegations of Claimant's 1008 Form. Also on July 6, 2020, Employer filed a Pre-Trial Statement, wherein Employer stipulated that Claimant was an employee on the date of the alleged accident. In the Pre-Trial Statement, Employer listed the issues to be litigated as including whether Claimant was injured in a work accident; the extent of the alleged injury and any on-going disability; and Claimant's entitlement to TTD benefits.
The OWC conducted a Scheduling Conference on September 3, 2020. Pursuant to that conference, the OWC ordered scheduling deadlines, which included the following:
Employer deposed Claimant on October 7, 2020. During the deposition, Claimant testified that, on March 17, 2020, 5 Claimant explained that at the end of his shift, he reported the pain to Mr. Sullivan, who directed him to go to Concentra, and that he went to Concentra as advised on the same day as the accident. Additionally, Claimant testified that he eventually discontinued treatment with Concentra and began receiving treatment at LA Health Solutions. He testified that he provided the same information about the accident and his pain to LA Health Solutions as he did to Concentra.
Regarding his ability to work, Claimant disclosed that he had returned to work as of August 2020. He testified that he earned $1,700.00 per week as a general manager of Creole Investments, a company he co-owned.
Claimant also testified that he applied for unemployment benefits roughly two days after he was laid off. He testified that he began receiving weekly unemployment benefits from May 2020 through the end of July 2020 at a rate of $847.00 per week. Claimant explained that, after July 2020, he started to earn $1,700.00 per week from his aforementioned job at Creole Investments.
The parties attended a voluntary pre-trial mediation conference on October 26, 2020, at which they did not resolve their differences. The following day, October 27, 2020, Claimant fax-filed his Pre-Trial Statement. Claimant's Pre-Trial Statement included the following:
On November 9, 2020, Employer filed a "Motion to Strike Claimant's Pre-Trial Statement" (hereinafter "Motion to Strike"). In the Motion to Strike, Employer argued as untimely those issues in Claimant's Pre-Trial...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting