Sign Up for Vincent AI
Plaza v. Heilbron (In re Heilbron)
Eric Edward Rothstein, Esq., Rothstein Law PLLC, The Woolworth Building, 233 Broadway, Suite 900, New York, NY 10279, Attorneys for Benjamin Plaza, Jr.
George Bassias, Esq., George Bassias Attorney LLC, 21-83 Steinway, Astoria, New York 11105, Attorneys for Michael Heilbron.
This adversary proceeding arises from a fistfight between the debtor, Michael Heilbron, and the plaintiff, Benjamin Plaza, Jr., on June 29, 2008; Mr. Heilbron's criminal plea to a single misdemeanor assault charge; a default judgment in Mr. Plaza's personal injury action against Mr. Heilbron; and now, Mr. Heilbron's attempt to discharge the default judgment debt in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case.
On May 7, 2018, Mr. Plaza commenced this adversary proceeding by filing a complaint against Mr. Heilbron, the debtor in the underlying Chapter 7 case. Mr. Plaza seeks a determination that the debt that Mr. Heilbron owes to him pursuant to a default judgment for civil claims for assault and battery (the "Default Judgment"), entered in a state court action entitled Benjamin Plaza, Jr. v. Michael Heilbron, in New York Supreme Court, Queens County (the "Queens Supreme Court Action"), is nondischargeable under Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(6).
On December 20, 2018, Mr. Plaza filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (the "Summary Judgment Motion" or "Summ. J. Mot."). In the Summary Judgment Motion, Mr. Plaza argued that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether the debt resulted from a "willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity" under Section 523(a)(6), because the doctrine of collateral estoppel prevented Mr. Heilbron from contesting those elements, in light of his guilty plea to a misdemeanor criminal charge of Assault in the Third Degree in Queens Criminal Court, and the Default Judgment in the Queens Supreme Court Action.
On January 15, 2020, this Court entered an order granting Mr. Plaza's Summary Judgment Motion, and Mr. Heilbron appealed from that judgment. On appeal, the District Court found that neither Mr. Heilbron's guilty plea nor the Default Judgment established that Mr. Heilbron had acted in a "willful and malicious" manner and remanded for trial on the twin issues of whether Mr. Heilbron had acted willfully and whether he had acted maliciously.
On February 23 and 24, 2023, this Court held trial on those questions. The Court now decides whether Mr. Plaza has met his burden to show that Mr. Heilbron's conduct was "willful" and "malicious." If so, then Mr. Heilbron's debt to Mr. Plaza will be excluded from the scope of Mr. Heilbron's Chapter 7 bankruptcy discharge. But if not, then the debt will be discharged.
Mr. Plaza's nondischargeability claim arises under Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(6) and is a core matter. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). As a core matter, this Court has constitutional authority to enter a final judgment because the claim alleged in the amended complaint stems "from the bankruptcy itself." Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462, 499, 131 S.Ct. 2594, 180 L.Ed.2d 475 (2011).
For these reasons, this Court has jurisdiction to consider and enter judgment on this claim under Judiciary Code Section 1334(b) and the Standing Order of Reference dated August 28, 1986, as amended by Order dated December 5, 2012, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
This nondischargeability action arises from an altercation that occurred in 2008, the guilty plea that Mr. Heilbron entered in the resulting criminal case, and a civil default judgment entered in the related lawsuit instituted by Mr. Plaza in 2009. Because they provide the context both for this adversary proceeding and the issues presented at trial, the circumstances of these events are summarized below.
More than fifteen years ago, on the evening of June 29, 2008, Mr. Heilbron punched Mr. Plaza in the chin, breaking his jaw. His injury is described in the record as "a fractured mandible that required open reduction, [and] internal fixation" of his jaw. Am. Compl. ¶ 8, ECF No. 6. Soon thereafter, Mr. Heilbron was placed under arrest by the New York City Police Department. Am. Compl. ¶ 11.
On July 1, 2008, Mr. Heilbron was charged with two counts of Assault in the Second Degree, Penal Law §§ 120.05(1) and (2), one count of Assault in the Third Degree, Penal Law § 120.00(1), and one count of Harassment in the Second Degree, Penal Law § 240.26(1) (the "Queens Criminal Court Action"). Am. Compl. ¶ 12.
The criminal complaint that resulted from Mr. Heilbron's arrest, sworn to by Detective Victor Herrera of Queens Detective Area 114 (the "Criminal Complaint" or "Crim. Compl."), states that on June 29, 2008 between 10:30 PM and 10:40 PM, at the northeast intersection of 78th Street and 21st Avenue in Queens, New York, Mr. Heilbron committed an assault in violation of New York Penal Law Section 120.05-1 (Assault in the Second Degree), Section 120.05-2 (Assault in the Second Degree), Section 120.00-1 (Assault in the Third Degree), and Section 240.26-1 (Harassment in the Second Degree). Summ. J. Mot. Exh. A, ECF No. 13-1 (Crim. Compl.).
The Criminal Complaint identifies Mr. Plaza as the source of Detective Herrera's information, and continues:
Summ. J. Mot. Exh. A., Crim. Compl. at 1.
More than seven months later, on February 5, 2009, Mr. Heilbron appeared before the Honorable Dorothy Chin Brandt of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Queens: Part AP-6 (the "Queens Criminal Court") for a plea and sentencing hearing. Summ. J. Mot. Exh. B, ECF No. 13-2 ). At that hearing, at which he was represented by counsel, Mr. Heilbron pleaded guilty to a single charge of Assault in the Third Degree, a class "A" misdemeanor. Id. In entering his plea, he responded to a series of questions from Judge Brandt, as follows:
About three weeks later, on February 27, 2009, the Queens Criminal Court issued a Certificate of Disposition, No. 86659, which provided that Mr. Heilbron agreed to plead guilty to a single charge of a Class A misdemeanor, all other charges were dropped, and his sentence did not include a period of incarceration. Plea Hrg. Tr. at 4.
New York Penal Law Section 120.00, pursuant to which Mr. Heilbron entered his plea, has three disjunctive subsections, as follows:
N.Y. Penal Law § 120.00. Neither the court nor Mr. Heilbron referred to, and his plea did not identify, a subsection of this statute to which Mr. Heilbron pleaded guilty.
On or about March 30, 2009, about two months after Mr. Heilbron entered his guilty plea, Mr. Plaza sued Mr. Heilbron in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Queens, seeking monetary damages arising from the assault. Summ. J. Mot. Exh. D, ECF No. 13-5 (the "Verified Complaint"). On June 12, 2009, the Verified Summons and Verified Complaint were served by Samara Kane on Jack Sheldon, a co-worker of Mr. Heilbron at the "Carlyle Hotel-Stewarding [Department]," at the 77th Street Service Entrance. Summ. J. Mot. Exh. G at p. 33, ECF No. 13-8. And on June 15, 2009, Ms. Kane mailed a copy of the Verified Summons and Verified Complaint to Mr. Heilbron at his place of business. Id.
In the Verified Complaint, Mr. Plaza alleges causes of action for assault and battery and seeks an award of costs. He states that, on June 29, 2008, Mr. Heilbron "assaulted [Mr. Plaza], ... causing him to sustain severe and permanent injuries." Verified Complaint, ¶ 3. Mr. Plaza further alleges, "[t]hat the aforesaid conduct by ...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting