Sign Up for Vincent AI
Plotkin v. Montgomery Cnty. Pub. Schs.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: September 12, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00571-TDC)
David Howard Plotkin, Appellant Pro Se.
Emily Rachlin, Office of the General Counsel, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
David Plotkin appeals the district court's order granting judgment on the pleadings to Montgomery County Public Schools ("MCPS") and concluding that Plotkin's son O.P., received a free appropriate public education ("FAPE") in mathematics during the third grade. On appeal, Plotkin argues that because MCPS did not fully implement O.P.'s Individualized Education Plan ("IEP"), O.P. was necessarily deprived of a FAPE. For the following reasons, we affirm.
The Individuals with Disabilities Act ("IDEA") offers federal money to states in exchange for a commitment to provide a FAPE to all children with certain disabilities. Fry v. Napoleon Cmty. Schs., 580 U.S. 154, 158 (2017). "A FAPE means special education and related services that are (1) without charge, (2) meet the standards of the state educational agency, (3) include the appropriate level of education in the state involved and (4) are provided in conformity with an [IEP] as required by the IDEA." K.I. v. Durham Pub. Schs. Bd. of Educ., 54 F.4th 779, 784-85 (4th Cir. 2022) (internal quotation marks omitted). The IEP is "the primary vehicle for ensuring the student receives a FAPE." Id. at 785.
"In IDEA cases, we conduct a modified de novo review, giving due weight to the underlying administrative proceedings." R.F. ex rel. E.F. v. Cecil Cnty. Pub. Schs., 919 F.3d 237, 244 (4th Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). Giving "due weight" means that "findings of fact made in administrative proceedings are considered to be prima facie correct, and if a reviewing court fails to adhere to them, it is obliged to explain why." MM ex rel. DM v. Sch. Dist. of Greenville Cnty., 303 F.3d 523, 531 (4th Cir. 2002). If the administrative findings of fact are not regularly made however, they are not entitled to deference. Cnty. Sch Bd. of Henrico Cnty. v. Z.P. ex rel. R.P., 399 F.3d 298, 305 (4th Cir. 2005). "Factual findings are not regularly made if they are reached through a process that is far from the accepted norm of a fact-finding process." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). In all cases, however, "the ultimate decision as to whether the state has complied with the IDEA is an independent decision made by the district court." R.F., 919 F.3d at 245 (internal quotation marks omitted). Even so, when "making this independent decision, courts should not substitute their own notions of sound educational policy for those of the school authorities which they review." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted).
Id. (internal citation omitted). "A procedural violation of the IDEA may not serve as the basis for recovery unless it resulted in the loss of an educational opportunity for the disabled child." T.B., Jr. ex rel. T.B., Sr. v. Prince George's Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 897 F.3d 566, 573 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks omitted). A procedural violation Id. (internal citation and internal quotation marks omitted). At base, the IDEA "requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting