R. v. Anthony (M.O.),

"...activities, are not immune from offending sexually: eg R v Poon, 2012 SKCA 76 (doctor); R v Jovel, 2018 MBQB 111 (doctor); R v Anthony, 2014 BCSC 2132 (psychologist); R v West, 2007 ABCA 67 (nurse); R v Klok, 2014 ABPC 102 (teacher); R v Smith, 2011 ABPC 268 (teacher/farmer/businessman); R ..."

"...by other treating professionals such as psychologists in R. v. Matheson (1999), 44 O.R. (3d) 557 (C.A.) (two years) and R. v. Anthony, 2014 BCSC 2132 (two years less a day); a dentist in R. v. Gavrilko, 2007 BCSC 1473 (12‑month conditional sentence order); and a massage therapist in R. v. R..."

"...digital penetration and six months for a single incidence of sexual touching. [45]       In R. v. Anthony, 2014 BCSC 2132, the Crown proceeded by indictment. As a result, a CSO was not available. Dr. Anthony was a psychologist who was treating the complainant f..."

"...for his offence. This is not an aggravating factor but it may be considered when determining the risk to re-offend: R. v. Anthony, 2014 BCSC 2132 at para. 45; Friesen at para. 165. [45]       Ms. Beckmann stated that Mr. Adams presents with a high level of dyna..."

"...activities, are not immune from offending sexually: eg R v Poon, 2012 SKCA 76 (doctor); R v Jovel, 2018 MBQB 111 (doctor); R v Anthony, 2014 BCSC 2132 (psychologist); R v West, 2007 ABCA 67 (nurse); R v Klok, 2014 ABPC 102 (teacher); R v Smith, 2011 ABPC 268 (teacher/farmer/businessman); R ..."

"...by other treating professionals such as psychologists in R. v. Matheson (1999), 44 O.R. (3d) 557 (C.A.) (two years) and R. v. Anthony, 2014 BCSC 2132 (two years less a day); a dentist in R. v. Gavrilko, 2007 BCSC 1473 (12‑month conditional sentence order); and a massage therapist in R. v. R..."

"...digital penetration and six months for a single incidence of sexual touching. [45]       In R. v. Anthony, 2014 BCSC 2132, the Crown proceeded by indictment. As a result, a CSO was not available. Dr. Anthony was a psychologist who was treating the complainant f..."

"...for his offence. This is not an aggravating factor but it may be considered when determining the risk to re-offend: R. v. Anthony, 2014 BCSC 2132 at para. 45; Friesen at para. 165. [45]       Ms. Beckmann stated that Mr. Adams presents with a high level of dyna..."