Sign Up for Vincent AI
R. v. Archambault,
5 cases
R v Archambault,
"...de la défense de Montréal-Laval-Longueuil, Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario) and Canadian Civil Liberties Association Interveners 2024 SCC 35 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40428 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Crim..."
Yat Sun Food Products Ltd v. Griffith Foods International Inc, 2025 FC 1688
"...deals with matters before the Registrar of Trademarks. [37] Relying on the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in R v Archambault, 2024 SCC 35 [Archambault], Yat Sun’s counsel argued that the new subsection 56(5), on its face, cannot have been intended to be retroactive and that Yat Sun..."
2025 BCSC 514,
"...action. 132 The Commissioner's submissions relied on the dissent of Justice Karakatsanis (though not on this point) in R. v. Archambault, 2024 SCC 35. She held that, for retrospective punishment to apply, there must be a new rule that interferes with a substantive legal interest that vested..."
Gulzar Transport Inc. v Office of the BC Container Trucking Commissioner,
"...action. 132 The Commissioner's submissions relied on the dissent of Justice Karakatsanis (though not on this point) in R. v. Archambault, 2024 SCC 35. She held that, for retrospective punishment to apply, there must be a new rule that interferes with a substantive legal interest that vested..."
R v Sabiston,
"...sentencing regime in the Criminal Code, there is simply no need to turn to the Charter for a remedy. … 18 We note that R v Archambault, 2024 SCC 35, affirmed that “[b]y nature, the court's role in sentencing includes consideration of ‘society's legitimate shared values and concerns’” (at pa..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
R v Archambault,
"...de la défense de Montréal-Laval-Longueuil, Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario) and Canadian Civil Liberties Association Interveners 2024 SCC 35 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40428 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Crim..."
Yat Sun Food Products Ltd v. Griffith Foods International Inc, 2025 FC 1688
"...deals with matters before the Registrar of Trademarks. [37] Relying on the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in R v Archambault, 2024 SCC 35 [Archambault], Yat Sun’s counsel argued that the new subsection 56(5), on its face, cannot have been intended to be retroactive and that Yat Sun..."
2025 BCSC 514,
"...action. 132 The Commissioner's submissions relied on the dissent of Justice Karakatsanis (though not on this point) in R. v. Archambault, 2024 SCC 35. She held that, for retrospective punishment to apply, there must be a new rule that interferes with a substantive legal interest that vested..."
Gulzar Transport Inc. v Office of the BC Container Trucking Commissioner,
"...action. 132 The Commissioner's submissions relied on the dissent of Justice Karakatsanis (though not on this point) in R. v. Archambault, 2024 SCC 35. She held that, for retrospective punishment to apply, there must be a new rule that interferes with a substantive legal interest that vested..."
R v Sabiston,
"...sentencing regime in the Criminal Code, there is simply no need to turn to the Charter for a remedy. … 18 We note that R v Archambault, 2024 SCC 35, affirmed that “[b]y nature, the court's role in sentencing includes consideration of ‘society's legitimate shared values and concerns’” (at pa..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting