R v Chapman

"...2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. Godoy, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 311; R. v. McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365, 131 O.R. (3d) 643; R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11, 386 C.C.C. (3d) 24. By Martin J. (dissenting) R. v. Strachan, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 980; R. v. Goldhart, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 463; R. v. Wittwer, 2008 SCC 33..."

"...(3d) 151; Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., 2006 SCC 36, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189; R. v. Zacharias, 2023 SCC 30; R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11, 386 C.C.C. (3d) 24; R. v. White, 2015 ONCA 508, 127 O.R. (3d) 32; R. v. Buchanan, 2020 ONCA 245, 150 O.R. (3d) 209; Smith v. Jones, [1999] ..."

"...Grant at para 226; R v Arnault, 2019 SKCA 109 at paras 78–79 [Arnault]; R v Loewen, 2018 SKCA 69 at para 67, 365 CCC (3d) 91; R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para 38, 60 CR (7th) 273 [Chapman]; Kossick at para 20. The reference to an “unreasonable finding” is to an error in the trial judge’s f..."

"...12, 412 CCC (3d) 147 [ Tim SC], and citing R v Paterson, 2017 SCC 15, [2017] 1 SCR 202. See also Moyles at paras 69–71; and R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at paras 101–105, 386 CCC (3d) 89 R v Beaver, 2022 SCC 54, 475 DLR (4th) 575 [ Beaver], summarized the first branch of the Grant analysis in ..."

"...to believe” – does not require proof on the balance of probabilities, much less proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” [134] In R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para. 65, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal held “The jurisprudence is consistent that “probability”, in this sense, does not mean “balanc..."

"...or ‘not unlikely,’ do [ sic ] 415 R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3 [ Glendinning ][emphasis in original], and R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65 [ Chapman ], respectively. For other decisions saying that the standard does not require proof on balance of probabilities, see R v Sp..."

"...to ABCA), af’d 2011 SCC 21 at paras 4, 5; Desilva , supra note 24 at para 57; R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3; R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65. 68 R v Lambert , infra note 226 at para 86. See also R v Hason , 2024 ONCA 369 at para 36. 69 Beaver , infra note 127 at para 72(6)..."

"................................... 381 Channa , R v , 2022 ONSC 7153 ......................................... 378-79, 386 Chapman , R v , 2020 SKCA 11 ............................................. 260, 272 Charette , R v , 2009 ONCA 310 ................................................ 154 Ch..."

"...160, 297, 410 R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 .................................................................................. 35 R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 ..................................................... 105, 111, 112, 115 R v Charles, 2012 SKCA 34 ............................................"

"...or ‘not unlikely,’ do [ sic ] 415 R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3 [ Glendinning ][emphasis in original], and R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65 [ Chapman ], respectively. For other decisions saying that the standard does not require proof on balance of probabilities, see R v Sp..."

"...to ABCA), af’d 2011 SCC 21 at paras 4, 5; Desilva , supra note 24 at para 57; R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3; R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65. 68 R v Lambert , infra note 226 at para 86. See also R v Hason , 2024 ONCA 369 at para 36. 69 Beaver , infra note 127 at para 72(6)..."

"................................... 381 Channa , R v , 2022 ONSC 7153 ......................................... 378-79, 386 Chapman , R v , 2020 SKCA 11 ............................................. 260, 272 Charette , R v , 2009 ONCA 310 ................................................ 154 Ch..."

"...160, 297, 410 R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 .................................................................................. 35 R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 ..................................................... 105, 111, 112, 115 R v Charles, 2012 SKCA 34 ............................................"

"...2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. Godoy, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 311; R. v. McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365, 131 O.R. (3d) 643; R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11, 386 C.C.C. (3d) 24. By Martin J. (dissenting) R. v. Strachan, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 980; R. v. Goldhart, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 463; R. v. Wittwer, 2008 SCC 33..."

"...(3d) 151; Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., 2006 SCC 36, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189; R. v. Zacharias, 2023 SCC 30; R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11, 386 C.C.C. (3d) 24; R. v. White, 2015 ONCA 508, 127 O.R. (3d) 32; R. v. Buchanan, 2020 ONCA 245, 150 O.R. (3d) 209; Smith v. Jones, [1999] ..."

"...Grant at para 226; R v Arnault, 2019 SKCA 109 at paras 78–79 [Arnault]; R v Loewen, 2018 SKCA 69 at para 67, 365 CCC (3d) 91; R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para 38, 60 CR (7th) 273 [Chapman]; Kossick at para 20. The reference to an “unreasonable finding” is to an error in the trial judge’s f..."

"...12, 412 CCC (3d) 147 [ Tim SC], and citing R v Paterson, 2017 SCC 15, [2017] 1 SCR 202. See also Moyles at paras 69–71; and R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at paras 101–105, 386 CCC (3d) 89 R v Beaver, 2022 SCC 54, 475 DLR (4th) 575 [ Beaver], summarized the first branch of the Grant analysis in ..."

"...to believe” – does not require proof on the balance of probabilities, much less proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” [134] In R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para. 65, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal held “The jurisprudence is consistent that “probability”, in this sense, does not mean “balanc..."