Sign Up for Vincent AI
R. v. Charles,
5 cases
R v Charles,
"...Yves Caleb Jr. Charles Appellant and His Majesty The King Respondent 2024 SCC 29 Present: Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40319 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Criminal law — Evidence — Admissibility — Hearsay — Principled exception to hearsay rule — Trial ju..."
R v Patrick,
"...substantive and threshold reliability. As explained by the Supreme Court of Canada in Bradshaw and reiterated in R. v. Charles, 2024 SCC 29 to determine whether “corroborative evidence is of assistance in the substantive reliability inquiry”, a trial judge 1. identify the material aspects o..."
Astolfi v Stone Creek Resorts Inc.,
"...meet the principled exception to hearsay, because it fails both the necessity and threshold reliability requirements (as per R v Charles, 2024 SCC 29 at paras 43–47; R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 at para 1; R v Denovan, 2024 ABCA 246 at para 24). I have not given that evidence any iii. Counsel'..."
TC v KA,
"...inadmissible and did not meet the principled exception to hearsay based on necessity and threshold reliability (as per R v Charles, 2024 SCC 29 at paras 43-47; R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 at para 1; R v Denovan, 2024 ABCA 246 at para 24), including outdated and prejudicial medical and educati..."
Lang-Newlands v Newlands,
"...minimal dangers and its exclusion, rather than its admission, would impede accurate fact finding”: Khelawon, at para. 2; R. v. Charles, 2024 SCC 29, at para. 265 The necessity criterion was met because Gordon passed away in 2001. Barb's and Don's evidence is also necessary because it is the..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
R v Charles,
"...Yves Caleb Jr. Charles Appellant and His Majesty The King Respondent 2024 SCC 29 Present: Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40319 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Criminal law — Evidence — Admissibility — Hearsay — Principled exception to hearsay rule — Trial ju..."
R v Patrick,
"...substantive and threshold reliability. As explained by the Supreme Court of Canada in Bradshaw and reiterated in R. v. Charles, 2024 SCC 29 to determine whether “corroborative evidence is of assistance in the substantive reliability inquiry”, a trial judge 1. identify the material aspects o..."
Astolfi v Stone Creek Resorts Inc.,
"...meet the principled exception to hearsay, because it fails both the necessity and threshold reliability requirements (as per R v Charles, 2024 SCC 29 at paras 43–47; R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 at para 1; R v Denovan, 2024 ABCA 246 at para 24). I have not given that evidence any iii. Counsel'..."
TC v KA,
"...inadmissible and did not meet the principled exception to hearsay based on necessity and threshold reliability (as per R v Charles, 2024 SCC 29 at paras 43-47; R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 at para 1; R v Denovan, 2024 ABCA 246 at para 24), including outdated and prejudicial medical and educati..."
Lang-Newlands v Newlands,
"...minimal dangers and its exclusion, rather than its admission, would impede accurate fact finding”: Khelawon, at para. 2; R. v. Charles, 2024 SCC 29, at para. 265 The necessity criterion was met because Gordon passed away in 2001. Barb's and Don's evidence is also necessary because it is the..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting