R v Lachance,

"...it must be treated with considerable caution by a trier of fact ( R v Hibbert, 2002 SCC 39 at paras 50–53; [2002] 2 SCR 445; R v Lachance, 2023 SKCA 48 at paras 80–81; R v Clark, 2022 SCC 49, endorsing the dissenting reasons of Leurer J.A. (as he then was) in R v Clark, SKCA 36 at para 72, ..."

"...the statements made by the Chambers judge, should be treated as if they are part of his reasons. As this Court noted in R v Lachance, 2023 SKCA 48, while it is sometimes appropriate to do so, “[c]aution is very much in order when a court is considering whether to draw inferences base..."

"...His Majesty the King Appellant and Jacky Regan Lachance Respondent 2023 SKCA 48 Before: Caldwell, Leurer and Barrington-Foote Docket: CACR3495 Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan Counsel: W. Dean Sinclair, K.C. for the Appellant Thomas Hynes and Aleida Oberholzer for the Respondent Barrington-..."

"...it must be treated with considerable caution by a trier of fact ( R v Hibbert, 2002 SCC 39 at paras 50–53; [2002] 2 SCR 445; R v Lachance, 2023 SKCA 48 at paras 80–81; R v Clark, 2022 SCC 49, endorsing the dissenting reasons of Leurer J.A. (as he then was) in R v Clark, SKCA 36 at para 72, ..."

"...the statements made by the Chambers judge, should be treated as if they are part of his reasons. As this Court noted in R v Lachance, 2023 SKCA 48, while it is sometimes appropriate to do so, “[c]aution is very much in order when a court is considering whether to draw inferences base..."

"...His Majesty the King Appellant and Jacky Regan Lachance Respondent 2023 SKCA 48 Before: Caldwell, Leurer and Barrington-Foote Docket: CACR3495 Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan Counsel: W. Dean Sinclair, K.C. for the Appellant Thomas Hynes and Aleida Oberholzer for the Respondent Barrington-..."