Sign Up for Vincent AI
R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5
5 cases
R v Settle,
"...R v Sillipp (1997), 209 AR 253, 120 CCC (3d) 384, leave denied [1998] SCCA No 3 (SCC No 26409) on its facts; see also R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5, 65 Alta LR (6th) 41, leave refused [2018] SCCA No 79 (SCC No [26] The summary conviction appeal judge was persuaded that the trial judge was mista..."
R v Johannesson, 2018 ABCA 248
"...L.R. 6th 1, 14-15 (chambers) (“A baseless appeal is one whose prospects of success are extremely low”). See also The Queen v. Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5, ¶4; 65 Alta. L.R. 6th 41, 47 (chambers) (“For leave to be considered, the ground of appeal against the decision of an appeal judge must be arg..."
R v Ruiz, 2021 ABCA 208
"...2020 ABCA 286 at paras 5-6, [2020] A.J. No. 818 (QL). [22] The decision in R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5 at para 5, 65 Alta LR (6th) 41, leave denied [2018] SCCA No 79 (QL) (SCC 38025), adds that the role of this Court is not to step into the shoes of t..."
R v Clarke,
"...but by demonstration of a meritorious question of law and a level of public importance that transcends the case: see eg R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5 at paras 4-8, 65 Alta LR (6th) 41, leave denied [2018] SCCA No 79 (QL) (SCC No 38025); R v Chow, 2017 ABCA 339 at paras 4-7, [2017] AJ No 1064 (Q..."
R v Clarke,
"...but by demonstration of a meritorious question of law and a level of public importance that transcends the case: see eg R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5 at paras 4-8, 65 Alta LR (6th) 41, leave denied [2018] SCCA No 79 (QL) (SCC No 38025); R v Chow, 2017 ABCA 339 at paras 4-7, [2017] AJ No 10..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
R v Settle,
"...R v Sillipp (1997), 209 AR 253, 120 CCC (3d) 384, leave denied [1998] SCCA No 3 (SCC No 26409) on its facts; see also R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5, 65 Alta LR (6th) 41, leave refused [2018] SCCA No 79 (SCC No [26] The summary conviction appeal judge was persuaded that the trial judge was mista..."
R v Johannesson, 2018 ABCA 248
"...L.R. 6th 1, 14-15 (chambers) (“A baseless appeal is one whose prospects of success are extremely low”). See also The Queen v. Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5, ¶4; 65 Alta. L.R. 6th 41, 47 (chambers) (“For leave to be considered, the ground of appeal against the decision of an appeal judge must be arg..."
R v Ruiz, 2021 ABCA 208
"...2020 ABCA 286 at paras 5-6, [2020] A.J. No. 818 (QL). [22] The decision in R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5 at para 5, 65 Alta LR (6th) 41, leave denied [2018] SCCA No 79 (QL) (SCC 38025), adds that the role of this Court is not to step into the shoes of t..."
R v Clarke,
"...but by demonstration of a meritorious question of law and a level of public importance that transcends the case: see eg R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5 at paras 4-8, 65 Alta LR (6th) 41, leave denied [2018] SCCA No 79 (QL) (SCC No 38025); R v Chow, 2017 ABCA 339 at paras 4-7, [2017] AJ No 1064 (Q..."
R v Clarke,
"...but by demonstration of a meritorious question of law and a level of public importance that transcends the case: see eg R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5 at paras 4-8, 65 Alta LR (6th) 41, leave denied [2018] SCCA No 79 (QL) (SCC No 38025); R v Chow, 2017 ABCA 339 at paras 4-7, [2017] AJ No 10..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting