Case Law R v Oltmann, 2020 ABPC 142

R v Oltmann, 2020 ABPC 142

Document Cited Authorities (20) Cited in (1) Related
1 cases
Document | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) – 2021
R. v. Kuznetsoff,
"...to operate a conveyance contrary to s 320.14(1)(b). Delivered: 12 January, 2021. Justice Joseph F. Kenkel [1] See also : R v Oltman, 2020 ABPC 142 and R v Speers, 2020 SKQB 199. [2] It appears the officer confused the ASD with an Approved Instrument such as the Intoxilyzer 8000C which has “..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
Document | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) – 2021
R. v. Kuznetsoff,
"...to operate a conveyance contrary to s 320.14(1)(b). Delivered: 12 January, 2021. Justice Joseph F. Kenkel [1] See also : R v Oltman, 2020 ABPC 142 and R v Speers, 2020 SKQB 199. [2] It appears the officer confused the ASD with an Approved Instrument such as the Intoxilyzer 8000C which has “..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex