Case Law R. v. Ottenbreit (B.), 2016 ABPC 77

R. v. Ottenbreit (B.), 2016 ABPC 77

Document Cited Authorities (15) Cited in (6) Related
5 cases
Document | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) – 2017
R v Brown, 2017 ABPC 235
"...ABPC 169 at para 26 and R v Dean, 2017 ABPC 37 at para 26.[36] Defence counsel provided the Court with the decision of R v Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77, in support of his position. This case deals with a pat-down search prior to the ASD demand. In the case before me, the police officer specific..."
Document | Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada) – 2017
R v Fournier, 2017 ABQB 533
"...means of administering the ASD test except by having Schwab sit in the rear of [the] police vehicle” (at para 49).[45] R v Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77: Henderson PCJ (as he then was) proposed that courts first consider whether it was reasonably necessary to conduct the ASD test in the police v..."
Document | Provincial Court of Manitoba (Canada) – 2018
R. v. SHARPE,
"...Alberta Courts excluded the results of subsequent breath tests pursuant to s. 24(2) of the Charter. See: 1.   R. v. Ottenbreit 2016 ABPC 77 2.   R. v. Osoba [2015] AJ 1122 3.   R. v. Toupin 2016 ABPC 44 4.   R. V. Wondu 2014 CarswellAlta 2709 [12] ..."
Document | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) – 2016
R. v. Parkar (H.), 2016 ABPC 169
"...admitted the ASD results. Three found no breach and admitted the ASD result. They are: a) R. v. Schwab, 2015 ABPC 180 b) R. v. Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77 c) R. v. Toupin, 2016 ABPC 44 d) R. v. Whyte, 2016 ABPC 69 e) R. v. Kim, 2016 ABPC 9 f) R. v. Gish, Transcript September 10, 2015 g) R. v. ..."
Document | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) – 2017
R. v. MacInnis, 2017 ABPC 230
"...ABPC 180R. v. Osoba, 2015 A.J. 1122R. v. Parker, 2016 ABPC 169 (which included a wide summary of similar issue cases)R. v. Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77R. v. Toupin, 2016 ABPC 44R. v. Kim, 2016 ABPC 9[22] The similar Charter issue raised in those cases is whether, the peace officer having decide..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
1 books and journal articles
Document | Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests – 2019
Digest: R v Riggs, 2017 SKPC 94
"...v Kim, 2016 ABPC 9 R v Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 SCR 59, 324 NR 215, 241 DLR (4th) 214, 185 CCC (3d) 308, 21 CR (6th) 1 R v Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77 R v Schwab, 2015 ABPC 180, 124 WCB (2d) 127, 22 CR (7th) 36, 83 MVR (6th) 283 R v So, 2014 ABCA 451, 9 Alta LR (6th) 382, 72 MVR (6th) 45 R ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 books and journal articles
Document | Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests – 2019
Digest: R v Riggs, 2017 SKPC 94
"...v Kim, 2016 ABPC 9 R v Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 SCR 59, 324 NR 215, 241 DLR (4th) 214, 185 CCC (3d) 308, 21 CR (6th) 1 R v Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77 R v Schwab, 2015 ABPC 180, 124 WCB (2d) 127, 22 CR (7th) 36, 83 MVR (6th) 283 R v So, 2014 ABCA 451, 9 Alta LR (6th) 382, 72 MVR (6th) 45 R ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) – 2017
R v Brown, 2017 ABPC 235
"...ABPC 169 at para 26 and R v Dean, 2017 ABPC 37 at para 26.[36] Defence counsel provided the Court with the decision of R v Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77, in support of his position. This case deals with a pat-down search prior to the ASD demand. In the case before me, the police officer specific..."
Document | Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada) – 2017
R v Fournier, 2017 ABQB 533
"...means of administering the ASD test except by having Schwab sit in the rear of [the] police vehicle” (at para 49).[45] R v Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77: Henderson PCJ (as he then was) proposed that courts first consider whether it was reasonably necessary to conduct the ASD test in the police v..."
Document | Provincial Court of Manitoba (Canada) – 2018
R. v. SHARPE,
"...Alberta Courts excluded the results of subsequent breath tests pursuant to s. 24(2) of the Charter. See: 1.   R. v. Ottenbreit 2016 ABPC 77 2.   R. v. Osoba [2015] AJ 1122 3.   R. v. Toupin 2016 ABPC 44 4.   R. V. Wondu 2014 CarswellAlta 2709 [12] ..."
Document | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) – 2016
R. v. Parkar (H.), 2016 ABPC 169
"...admitted the ASD results. Three found no breach and admitted the ASD result. They are: a) R. v. Schwab, 2015 ABPC 180 b) R. v. Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77 c) R. v. Toupin, 2016 ABPC 44 d) R. v. Whyte, 2016 ABPC 69 e) R. v. Kim, 2016 ABPC 9 f) R. v. Gish, Transcript September 10, 2015 g) R. v. ..."
Document | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) – 2017
R. v. MacInnis, 2017 ABPC 230
"...ABPC 180R. v. Osoba, 2015 A.J. 1122R. v. Parker, 2016 ABPC 169 (which included a wide summary of similar issue cases)R. v. Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77R. v. Toupin, 2016 ABPC 44R. v. Kim, 2016 ABPC 9[22] The similar Charter issue raised in those cases is whether, the peace officer having decide..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex