Sign Up for Vincent AI
R. v. Pan,
5 cases
R v Pan,
"...Mylvaganam, Daniel Chi-Kwong Wong and Lenford Crawford Respondents/Appellants on cross-appeal and Attorney General of Alberta Intervener 2025 SCC 12 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40839 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Cri..."
R v Picken,
"...420 [ Cairney]. 19 Whether there is an air of reality to a defence is a question of law, reviewable on a correctness standard: R v Pan, 2025 SCC 12 [ Pan] at para 35; Cinous at para 55; R v Alas, 2022 SCC 14 at para 3, [2022] 1 SCR 283; and R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103 at paras 112–116, 380 CCC..."
R v Peterson,
"...mistakenly believed there was. 19 Whether or not a defence has an air of reality is a question of law reviewable for correctness: R v Pan, 2025 SCC 12 at paras 35-37; R v Wong, 2022 ABCA 171 at para 2 [ Wong]; R v Heymerdinguer, 2021 ABCA 112 at para 36; R v XJ, 2012 ABCA 69 at para 6; R v ..."
R v Lam,
"...are put to the jury for consideration: see R. v. Pappas, 2013 SCC 56, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 452, at para. 26. 17 Most recently, in R. v. Pan, 2025 SCC 12, the Supreme Court of Canada stated the air of reality test seeks to balance two competing considerations. On the one hand, the test ensures th..."
R v Richer,
"...While the error was serious, the evidence against the appellant was so overwhelming that a jury would inevitably convict: R. v. Pan, 2025 SCC 12, at para. 87; R. v. Tayo Tompouba, 2024 SCC 16, 491 D.L.R. (4th) 195, at para. 6 I would allow the sentence appeal. The evidence established that ..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
R v Pan,
"...Mylvaganam, Daniel Chi-Kwong Wong and Lenford Crawford Respondents/Appellants on cross-appeal and Attorney General of Alberta Intervener 2025 SCC 12 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40839 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Cri..."
R v Picken,
"...420 [ Cairney]. 19 Whether there is an air of reality to a defence is a question of law, reviewable on a correctness standard: R v Pan, 2025 SCC 12 [ Pan] at para 35; Cinous at para 55; R v Alas, 2022 SCC 14 at para 3, [2022] 1 SCR 283; and R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103 at paras 112–116, 380 CCC..."
R v Peterson,
"...mistakenly believed there was. 19 Whether or not a defence has an air of reality is a question of law reviewable for correctness: R v Pan, 2025 SCC 12 at paras 35-37; R v Wong, 2022 ABCA 171 at para 2 [ Wong]; R v Heymerdinguer, 2021 ABCA 112 at para 36; R v XJ, 2012 ABCA 69 at para 6; R v ..."
R v Lam,
"...are put to the jury for consideration: see R. v. Pappas, 2013 SCC 56, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 452, at para. 26. 17 Most recently, in R. v. Pan, 2025 SCC 12, the Supreme Court of Canada stated the air of reality test seeks to balance two competing considerations. On the one hand, the test ensures th..."
R v Richer,
"...While the error was serious, the evidence against the appellant was so overwhelming that a jury would inevitably convict: R. v. Pan, 2025 SCC 12, at para. 87; R. v. Tayo Tompouba, 2024 SCC 16, 491 D.L.R. (4th) 195, at para. 6 I would allow the sentence appeal. The evidence established that ..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting