Sign Up for Vincent AI
R v Pelletier,
5 cases
R v Kishayinew,
"...be reliable, a credible witness’s testimony is not necessarily reliable: see Morrissey, H.C., Patrick, Schaff, Wolff, and R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113 at paras 138–139. [60] There are many reasons why witnesses – who are forthright, acting in good faith and honestly doing their best to tell..."
Saskatchewan v Racette,
"...have an obligation to manage the trial, including controlling witnesses and making sure their testimony stays on track: R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113 at paras 51 and 103. Dr. Ladham was not answering the questions that were being asked by his own counsel and was providing his evidence in a m..."
R v Laberge, 2021 ABPC 245
"...a credible witness’s testimony is not necessarily reliable: see Morrissey, H.C., Patrick, Schaff, Wolff, and R v Pelletier¸ 2019 SKCA 113 at paras 60 There are many reasons why witnesses – who are forthright, acting in good faith and honestly doing their best to tell the ..."
EVANGELOS TSIAPLAS v. R.,
"...In a relatively recent case, R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113, 381 CCC (3d) 487, the Court of Appeal considered whether the trial judge erred in how she dealt with an extremely difficult cross‑examination. The Court of Appeal stated as follows at paragraphs 169‑170: [169]
..."
R v Stone,
"...an error in law or in principle or a palpable and overriding error with respect to the evidence: see Gagnon at para 20 and R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113 at para 116. [20] With the deferential standard of review in mind, I turn to the specific passages from the trial transcript that were iden..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
R v Kishayinew,
"...be reliable, a credible witness’s testimony is not necessarily reliable: see Morrissey, H.C., Patrick, Schaff, Wolff, and R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113 at paras 138–139. [60] There are many reasons why witnesses – who are forthright, acting in good faith and honestly doing their best to tell..."
Saskatchewan v Racette,
"...have an obligation to manage the trial, including controlling witnesses and making sure their testimony stays on track: R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113 at paras 51 and 103. Dr. Ladham was not answering the questions that were being asked by his own counsel and was providing his evidence in a m..."
R v Laberge, 2021 ABPC 245
"...a credible witness’s testimony is not necessarily reliable: see Morrissey, H.C., Patrick, Schaff, Wolff, and R v Pelletier¸ 2019 SKCA 113 at paras 60 There are many reasons why witnesses – who are forthright, acting in good faith and honestly doing their best to tell the ..."
EVANGELOS TSIAPLAS v. R.,
"...In a relatively recent case, R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113, 381 CCC (3d) 487, the Court of Appeal considered whether the trial judge erred in how she dealt with an extremely difficult cross‑examination. The Court of Appeal stated as follows at paragraphs 169‑170: [169]
..."
R v Stone,
"...an error in law or in principle or a palpable and overriding error with respect to the evidence: see Gagnon at para 20 and R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113 at para 116. [20] With the deferential standard of review in mind, I turn to the specific passages from the trial transcript that were iden..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting