Sign Up for Vincent AI
R v Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17
5 cases
Cartwright v Rocky View County Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 408
"...v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65. The standard of review with respect to reasonable apprehension of bias is correctness: R v Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17 at para 6; R v Schmaltz, 2015 ABCA 4 at paras Analysis Reasonable Apprehension of Bias [19] The test to determine whether an apprehension of bias ..."
R v Favel,
"...that the verdict cannot ‘be supported by the evidence’ within the meaning of s. 686(1)( a)(i)”) & The Queen v. Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17, ¶ 6; 370 C.C.C. 3d 411, 415 (“Actual prejudice … is not a prerequisite to a finding that a miscarriage of justice has occurred; such a finding ma..."
R v Quintero-Gelvez,
"...Queen v. Quintero Gelvez, 2021 ABCA 189. An earlier conviction had been overturned and a new trial ordered. The Queen v. Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17. [9] Ashworth, “Techniques of Guidance on Sentencing”, [1984] Crim. L. Rev. 519, 521 (“Whereas most appellate decisions..."
R v Vandewater,
"...“[t]rial fairness and reasonable apprehension of bias are questions of law reviewed on the standard of correctness” ( R v Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17 at para 6, 370 CCC (3d) 411). 22 A misapprehension of the evidence may ground appellate intervention either pursuant to s. 686(1)(a)(i) or ..."
R v Walton, 2022 ABCA 276
"...of the exercise of the right cannot be justified where the result is to deny full answer and defence”: R v Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17 at para 9 citing R v Colling, 2017 ABCA 286 at para 18, aff’d 2018 SCC [53] In D..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
Cartwright v Rocky View County Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 408
"...v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65. The standard of review with respect to reasonable apprehension of bias is correctness: R v Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17 at para 6; R v Schmaltz, 2015 ABCA 4 at paras Analysis Reasonable Apprehension of Bias [19] The test to determine whether an apprehension of bias ..."
R v Favel,
"...that the verdict cannot ‘be supported by the evidence’ within the meaning of s. 686(1)( a)(i)”) & The Queen v. Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17, ¶ 6; 370 C.C.C. 3d 411, 415 (“Actual prejudice … is not a prerequisite to a finding that a miscarriage of justice has occurred; such a finding ma..."
R v Quintero-Gelvez,
"...Queen v. Quintero Gelvez, 2021 ABCA 189. An earlier conviction had been overturned and a new trial ordered. The Queen v. Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17. [9] Ashworth, “Techniques of Guidance on Sentencing”, [1984] Crim. L. Rev. 519, 521 (“Whereas most appellate decisions..."
R v Vandewater,
"...“[t]rial fairness and reasonable apprehension of bias are questions of law reviewed on the standard of correctness” ( R v Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17 at para 6, 370 CCC (3d) 411). 22 A misapprehension of the evidence may ground appellate intervention either pursuant to s. 686(1)(a)(i) or ..."
R v Walton, 2022 ABCA 276
"...of the exercise of the right cannot be justified where the result is to deny full answer and defence”: R v Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17 at para 9 citing R v Colling, 2017 ABCA 286 at para 18, aff’d 2018 SCC [53] In D..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting