R v Randall, 2020 ABCA 52

"...(or ... other exculpatory evidence) cannot be taken as proof of the accused’s guilt. See R v SMC, 2020 ABCA 19 at para 24; R v Randall, 2020 ABCA 52 at para [179] The Court of Appeal cautioned in Randall at para 62 that the purpose of the W(D) approach is to ensure that the burden never shi..."

"...not equate to proof of his or her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: JHS at para 13. See also R v SMC, 2020 ABCA 19 at para 24; R v Randall, 2020 ABCA 52 at para [12] At para 47 of Ryon, Justice Martin confirmed that whether evidence exculpating an accused raises a reasonable doubt must be as..."

"...considering the totality of the evidence. [14]        The Court of Appeal confirmed in R v Randall, 2020 ABCA 52 at para 62 that the purpose of the W(D) approach is to ensure that the burden never shifts from the Crown to prove every element of the offence..."

"...of an offence beyond a reasonable doubt. Further, the reasonable doubt standard applies to “vital issues.” See R v Randall, 2020 ABCA 52 at para [16]           If credibility is an important issue in a case, the reasonable doub..."

"...is a question of law that attracts a standard of review of correctness:  R. v. Glessman, 2013 ABCA 86 at para. 7; R. v. Randall, 2020 ABCA 52 at para. 32. [44]       A decision that the recipient of a statement is or is not a person in authority in relatio..."

"...272 Ramos , R v , 2010 ONCJ 229 .................................................... 31 Randall , R v , 2020 ABCA 52 ................................................... 15 Ranhotra , R v , 2022 ONCA 548 ........................................... 25, 36, 40 Rasela , R v , [2024] OJ No 1079 ..."

"...McKinney v University of Guelph , [1990] 3 SCR 229 at 261-62, 1990 CanLII 60. 90 R v Buhay , 2003 SCC 30 at paras 25-31; R v Randall , 2020 ABCA 52 at para 41. 91 Buhay , ibid at paras 28-31. 92 R v Nguyen , 2016 BCCA 32 at paras 56-58. 93 Royal Bank of Canada v Welton , 2009 ONCA 48 at par..."

"...272 Ramos , R v , 2010 ONCJ 229 .................................................... 31 Randall , R v , 2020 ABCA 52 ................................................... 15 Ranhotra , R v , 2022 ONCA 548 ........................................... 25, 36, 40 Rasela , R v , [2024] OJ No 1079 ..."

"...McKinney v University of Guelph , [1990] 3 SCR 229 at 261-62, 1990 CanLII 60. 90 R v Buhay , 2003 SCC 30 at paras 25-31; R v Randall , 2020 ABCA 52 at para 41. 91 Buhay , ibid at paras 28-31. 92 R v Nguyen , 2016 BCCA 32 at paras 56-58. 93 Royal Bank of Canada v Welton , 2009 ONCA 48 at par..."

"...(or ... other exculpatory evidence) cannot be taken as proof of the accused’s guilt. See R v SMC, 2020 ABCA 19 at para 24; R v Randall, 2020 ABCA 52 at para [179] The Court of Appeal cautioned in Randall at para 62 that the purpose of the W(D) approach is to ensure that the burden never shi..."

"...not equate to proof of his or her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: JHS at para 13. See also R v SMC, 2020 ABCA 19 at para 24; R v Randall, 2020 ABCA 52 at para [12] At para 47 of Ryon, Justice Martin confirmed that whether evidence exculpating an accused raises a reasonable doubt must be as..."

"...considering the totality of the evidence. [14]        The Court of Appeal confirmed in R v Randall, 2020 ABCA 52 at para 62 that the purpose of the W(D) approach is to ensure that the burden never shifts from the Crown to prove every element of the offence..."

"...of an offence beyond a reasonable doubt. Further, the reasonable doubt standard applies to “vital issues.” See R v Randall, 2020 ABCA 52 at para [16]           If credibility is an important issue in a case, the reasonable doub..."

"...is a question of law that attracts a standard of review of correctness:  R. v. Glessman, 2013 ABCA 86 at para. 7; R. v. Randall, 2020 ABCA 52 at para. 32. [44]       A decision that the recipient of a statement is or is not a person in authority in relatio..."